bertrandsv87

iTrader: (2)

They could not use XXX for rated PG reasons...lol.....

DARKSIDE

iTrader: (2)

only post that makes sense...

redbones

I expect no less than that with all the R&D poured into it on a platform that has already been proven. 90% of the homework was already done by others, and they just had to add their own taste to finish it off.

2uzferunner03

I think anyone looking for a new tc should be intrigued by this offering from hpi. Especially if it performs well this weekend. I want to hear from all the tcxx owners who just sank $300 into the upgrade kit. How pissed are you guys? Enough to switch brands?

redbones

I bet 99% of the racers can't make use of the difference (if any) between the updated TCXX and pro5.

2uzferunner03

These company's don't release a revised or new version of the same product every year for no reason. New and shiny sells

inpuressa

iTrader: (10)

seems like RC manufactures are going the way of the smartphone market. Miniscule changes but hype it up to death

theproffesor

iTrader: (66)

+1

ZZracing

EDWARD2003

iTrader: (8)

HPI/HB did their homework and the new chassis looks great. I'm really liking the roll-center mounts, and carbon fiber ackerman arms. Hope they do well at this years WC.

theproffesor

iTrader: (66)

He has vertical sway links on this one. Which ones will the car come with? Did anyone esle also notice the battery side of chassis is milled out directly opposite the motor. As if you could flip fhe motor and battery layout???

Chrisgt2

iTrader: (12)

That looks like JJ's car, the other pics were of Andy Moore's

EDWARD2003

iTrader: (8)

That's nothing new..Team Magic does this on their chassis'. It's done to create even chassis flex.

http://www.redrc.net/2013/05/team-ma...is/#more-66443

EDWARD2003

iTrader: (8)

Vertical sway links? You mean roll-center links?

frozenpod

iTrader: (1)

Looks good I hope they do well at the event and can provide strong ongoing parts support.