Hot Bodies Cyclone
#7201
Tech Master
Tez - I had a similar problem with my recently. There are many changes with the setup that can be made. But my car was not reacting to many of the changes. I talked with Nick Stampfel and Stephen Sobottka. After they drove the car Nick said it felt like the front shocks were low on oil. My immediate reaction was, "No way"! The oil was only a week old. Well, I emptied and re-filled the front shocks with new oil, and the car was spectacular! The lower o-rings must be going bad on mine. Just something else to try. Your setup looks very comparable to mine. Shoot me your email and I can send you mine.
Snowy.
Snowy.
Last edited by Essnowyt; 02-19-2007 at 10:21 AM.
#7202
Tech Master
KFA - They stop the sway bar from moving from left-right in the mounts.
Snowy.
Snowy.
#7203
Tez,
If the fronts rolling and digging in too much try making the front link more angled. This will reduce the front from rolling as much.
If the rear is loose I'd try moving the rear wishbones back by 1.5mm, so you have all the spacers towards the centre of the car. This will make it much more stable.
Also I've noticed you are running 2 hole pistons, I personally woudnt recommend that after much testing. If you get a chance try 3x1.1mm pistons, it should make the car abit more reactive.
I'll fill in a sheet with the setup I'm running, seems to work everywhere I've been with minimal tweaks.
Cheers,
Phil.
If the fronts rolling and digging in too much try making the front link more angled. This will reduce the front from rolling as much.
If the rear is loose I'd try moving the rear wishbones back by 1.5mm, so you have all the spacers towards the centre of the car. This will make it much more stable.
Also I've noticed you are running 2 hole pistons, I personally woudnt recommend that after much testing. If you get a chance try 3x1.1mm pistons, it should make the car abit more reactive.
I'll fill in a sheet with the setup I'm running, seems to work everywhere I've been with minimal tweaks.
Cheers,
Phil.
Last edited by Phil C; 02-20-2007 at 03:01 PM.
#7204
Heres that setup sheet.
#7205
i'm also thinking about buying the stormer cyclone, but I've never been a fan of the curved bulkhead over the batteries. i did see an option for a straight bar that attaches to the topdeck. has anyone used it or know the like. I also thought there as a center brace to create an even flex across the top deck....
#7206
just wondering from the cyclone fans, i've got a yokomo bd, is there anyone that has run both and can give a good perspecive on the performance differences between the two cars. I was going to sell my bd and buy the stormer cyclone.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
#7207
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Electro-MAX RC
just wondering from the cyclone fans, i've got a yokomo bd, is there anyone that has run both and can give a good perspecive on the performance differences between the two cars. I was going to sell my bd and buy the stormer cyclone.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
#7208
Tech Initiate
Originally Posted by Phil C
Heres that setup sheet.
Tez
#7210
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by Electro-MAX RC
i'm also thinking about buying the stormer cyclone, but I've never been a fan of the curved bulkhead over the batteries. i did see an option for a straight bar that attaches to the topdeck. has anyone used it or know the like. I also thought there as a center brace to create an even flex across the top deck....
However, I managed to bend my middle bulkhead, so I replaced it with the straight one by "Square". They do all the colours. It (like all Square stuff) is well made.
The middle brace is a GOOD idea - in a big crash, the forces going from bumper, through topdeck, will go into the middle bulkhead. Mine bent sideways and whilst the top-deck snapped due to lack of support. It split at the y junction. I since installed a CF brace and in another crash that snapped another top-deck, the middle bulkhead has stayed straight and true.
#7211
BMI IS SELL THEIR STUFF THEMSELF, JUST GIVE THEN AN CALL AND U CAN GET WHAT EVER HE MAKES
#7212
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
Originally Posted by edward Haywood
Where can i find bmi chasis kit for the cyclone to run on carpet with 26mm foams also looking for kit for tc4
#7213
Tech Elite
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by Electro-MAX RC
just wondering from the cyclone fans, i've got a yokomo bd, is there anyone that has run both and can give a good perspecive on the performance differences between the two cars. I was going to sell my bd and buy the stormer cyclone.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
assume i'll be running the car in 19t rubber on carpet.
#7214
I have run both the BD and the Cyclone as well and I felt, as many have said, the Cyclone is much easier to set up and handles slightly better.
I found with the BD that it flexes differently either way due to the topdeck design, which makes the car less consistent. The shocks Yokomo aren’t particularly good either unless you mod them.
As for speed I don't think you can say one car is faster than another unless the drivetrain is producing lots of drag, which in the case of the Cyclone can't be said. Most people run their cars to the minimum weight limit anyway so weight shouldn’t be an issue either.
Both cars have their pros and cons but in my opinion the Cyclone is the better car.
I found with the BD that it flexes differently either way due to the topdeck design, which makes the car less consistent. The shocks Yokomo aren’t particularly good either unless you mod them.
As for speed I don't think you can say one car is faster than another unless the drivetrain is producing lots of drag, which in the case of the Cyclone can't be said. Most people run their cars to the minimum weight limit anyway so weight shouldn’t be an issue either.
Both cars have their pros and cons but in my opinion the Cyclone is the better car.