Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2991Likes

1/12 forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2015 | 07:09 AM
  #42136  
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,999
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SlowerOne
The design of the cars haven't change for almost 15 years, so what makes you think it is out of date...?
No real reason, except that I've gotten conflicting information on the front spring information recently. It's actually worked pretty well for me in general over the years. Just thought I would get some input and put a new version up for others to use. (or better yet, beg Martin Crisp to put it in his setup app so I can use it there).

Desert Rat says most of it is wrong, others say it's right on...I'd like to hear what everyone has to say on what's wrong or what could be improved or updated.
dr_hfuhuhurr is online now  
Old 02-22-2015 | 09:55 AM
  #42137  
swimbikerun's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (108)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 891
From: Elmhurst, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Dilligafms
Hello all, I am fairly new to 12th scale end of things. I have 1 big question that I cant seem to find the answer for. I am running a Hobbywing xerun v3.1 esc along with a Novak ballistic 17.5, but for the life of me I cant get the esc to stay running on a 1s. I have tried the receiver pack/bec but have not had any luck. Thanks for your imput.
Make sure you turnoff the voltage cutoff since you would never achieve 6v+ with 1s.
swimbikerun is offline  
Old 02-22-2015 | 11:38 AM
  #42138  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
No real reason, except that I've gotten conflicting information on the front spring information recently. It's actually worked pretty well for me in general over the years. Just thought I would get some input and put a new version up for others to use. (or better yet, beg Martin Crisp to put it in his setup app so I can use it there).

Desert Rat says most of it is wrong, others say it's right on...I'd like to hear what everyone has to say on what's wrong or what could be improved or updated.
I've read setup guides that contradict each other. I think this post explains why.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/13683922-post41706.html
Dillon71 is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 05:49 AM
  #42139  
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,999
From: Westchester, NY
Default

You're right, this is a great post. Definitely puts it into perspective.

Originally Posted by andrewdoherty
Since were discussing the mental mindsets we develop to build and tune cars I'll bring up a point I haven't sen addressed. Most if not all of the settings we change on model cars can be envisioned as a linear number line laid over a roof top. Lets say side spring stiffness from softest like an AE black or CRC .45 on the left side of the roof to an AE red or CRC .60 on the right side. The direction you want to adjust the stiffness of the side spring depends on which side of the roof peak you're on. The roof peak is our optimal setting. In addition the roof peak is not always in the center of the scale and also moves as other changes to the car are made. For example (this is hypothetical for the sake of explaining my thought) in modified 12th in high traction the peak of the roof is generally skewed to the far left which leads to the use of soft springs to avoid lifting inside rear tires. The peak can move dependent on several factors such as grip level, vehicle speed, and track configuration. This helps to explain how two drivers can make opposite changes in different conditions and both feel that they added grip. Their racing environment placed their original settings on opposite sides of the roof peak and while one went with stiffer springs, or lube or whatever and the other person went softer, they were both moving towards the peak of the roof for their specific set of circumstances. Food for thought...
dr_hfuhuhurr is online now  
Old 02-23-2015 | 12:30 PM
  #42140  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 997
Default

http://www.brca.org/sections/subsect...ationals/24542

Lots of great information from the BRCA. guys.
what is confusing to me though is the rollouts quoted for 13.5. I would consider a rollout of around 85mm to be typical here in Canada, but the Brits seem to be using much lower gearing.
Whats going on? Any Brits care to chime in?
notsocrazybrit is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 12:46 PM
  #42141  
Tech Master
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,879
From: Fort Collins, CO
Default

Originally Posted by notsocrazybrit
http://www.brca.org/sections/subsect...ationals/24542

Lots of great information from the BRCA. guys.
what is confusing to me though is the rollouts quoted for 13.5. I would consider a rollout of around 85mm to be typical here in Canada, but the Brits seem to be using much lower gearing.
Whats going on? Any Brits care to chime in?
Track layouts that are more technical than what we see in North America, with shorter chutes and more deceleration/acceleration per lap?
LloydLoar is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 01:38 PM
  #42142  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 997
Default

Originally Posted by LloydLoar
Track layouts that are more technical than what we see in North America, with shorter chutes and more deceleration/acceleration per lap?
Yes I agree. That seems to be the only reasonable explanation.
There are videos from some of the rounds. The layouts look fantastic.
It just seemed to me that 70-75mm rollout is remarkably low regardless of the track layout.
notsocrazybrit is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 01:53 PM
  #42143  
Tech Master
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,586
From: Lutz, FL
Default

Originally Posted by notsocrazybrit
http://www.brca.org/sections/subsect...ationals/24542

Lots of great information from the BRCA. guys.
what is confusing to me though is the rollouts quoted for 13.5. I would consider a rollout of around 85mm to be typical here in Canada, but the Brits seem to be using much lower gearing.
Whats going on? Any Brits care to chime in?
That only comes out to a tooth or maybe two at most difference in pinion.

Monti
Monti is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 02:14 PM
  #42144  
CristianTabush's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,165
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by notsocrazybrit
Yes I agree. That seems to be the only reasonable explanation.
There are videos from some of the rounds. The layouts look fantastic.
It just seemed to me that 70-75mm rollout is remarkably low regardless of the track layout.
Our track is fairly flowing and medium sized. Personally I run a 68 roll out with 58* of timing on an Actinium 13.5. It would be close with an R1 as well. Now, if I am running a D4, the roll out would be between 78-84 typically. Each motor seems to have different characteristics.

The way I set up my roll out with a new motor is to go out with a baseline, say 76 with 42.5mm tires and X pinion. If my car keeps getting faster as my tires get smaller without changing pinion, then that means the roll out is too high (as the roll out obviously decreases with smaller tires). Typically when I have a new motor, I ill keep the pinion the same until I find the "sweet Spot".

With the actiniums we tried 80 as a start and they were dogs, and seemed to get faster as the roll out got smaller. Eventually I settled for 72 and ran like that for a while. One day I started with smaller tires than what I typically would (41.5) and a 72 roll out. That particular day I was lazy and did not change my pinion, and on the 3rd run, the car came alive. I came back and did the math, and the Roll out happened to be at 68. The guys locally that run D4s/TP/Reedy are back more around the conventional 78-84 range.

So the moral to the story is that every motor is different. Add the fact that timing also plays a big role in all of the equation and the answers to do it correctly are several. Much like with AWD's "peaks" analogy ( I call it a bell curve), there are multiple correct ways of doing this and getting good results.
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 04:25 PM
  #42145  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15
Default

Just build my first modern 1/12, an Xray X12 '14.
What's the average race ready weight on these nice cars?

diHib is offline  
Old 02-23-2015 | 04:48 PM
  #42146  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,298
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Default

Min weight is 730 grams as far as I know. (roar).

My older xray X12 requires aluminum screws to get anywhere close to that weight.
Antimullet is offline  
Old 02-24-2015 | 07:36 AM
  #42147  
Tech Master
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,325
From: Grand Portage, MN
Default

my crc genX sits at 731 with a 7000 smc battery and D3.5 motor
jdeadman is offline  
Old 02-24-2015 | 08:31 AM
  #42148  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 997
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
Our track is fairly flowing and medium sized. Personally I run a 68 roll out with 58* of timing on an Actinium 13.5. It would be close with an R1 as well. Now, if I am running a D4, the roll out would be between 78-84 typically. Each motor seems to have different characteristics.

The way I set up my roll out with a new motor is to go out with a baseline, say 76 with 42.5mm tires and X pinion. If my car keeps getting faster as my tires get smaller without changing pinion, then that means the roll out is too high (as the roll out obviously decreases with smaller tires). Typically when I have a new motor, I ill keep the pinion the same until I find the "sweet Spot".

With the actiniums we tried 80 as a start and they were dogs, and seemed to get faster as the roll out got smaller. Eventually I settled for 72 and ran like that for a while. One day I started with smaller tires than what I typically would (41.5) and a 72 roll out. That particular day I was lazy and did not change my pinion, and on the 3rd run, the car came alive. I came back and did the math, and the Roll out happened to be at 68. The guys locally that run D4s/TP/Reedy are back more around the conventional 78-84 range.

So the moral to the story is that every motor is different. Add the fact that timing also plays a big role in all of the equation and the answers to do it correctly are several. Much like with AWD's "peaks" analogy ( I call it a bell curve), there are multiple correct ways of doing this and getting good results.

Ok. Thanks Cristian, some great advice there.
I've got to be honest I had no idea people were running 50deg of timing let alone 58. I don't doubt that's the explaination.
notsocrazybrit is offline  
Old 02-24-2015 | 10:47 AM
  #42149  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 192
From: Colorado
Default

For someone getting back into 12th scale bashing
what is a decent without breaking the bank, car to buy?

thank you
brushless55 is offline  
Old 02-24-2015 | 11:05 AM
  #42150  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,799
From: New Bern, N.C.
Default

Originally Posted by brushless55
For someone getting back into 12th scale bashing
what is a decent without breaking the bank, car to buy?

thank you
CRC, Xray, Serpent, TOP, Speedmerchant, VBC, AE......all are truly excellent cars, each with their subtle nuances, loyal followings, and all fully capable of winning races. With regard to cost, there is little doubt that the CRC car is the least expensive of the lot. CRC's parts supply and customer support is excellent too. And it sure doesn't hurt that their latest edition (the XTI-WC, used by Mark Reinhardt to win the recent World Championships) works great right out of the box, without need for extra cost options or upgrades. Honestly, you can't go wrong with any of today's current edition side link cars. As compared to other forms of RC racing, 1/12th scale is a very cost effective way to have great fun provided that there is a carpet venue convenient to wherever you live.
vafactor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.