New Improved Personal Transponder (i-PT)
06-08-2006, 11:31 AM
#17
economic argument aside, the cloning is awesome. if amb offered cloning as an option upon ordering (even for an adder), i would do it. my pt# is in alot of databases from going to the big races. it's nice get practice laps and a name with them for the internet race coverage year after year.
as a track manager, it would be nice to see that each pt# belong to a racer, and not a vehicle. racers swapping pt's from class to class is a hassle with some of the scoring programs.
this is good. then again, any competition to a company that monopolizes the market is good. burn in hell, amb!
as a track manager, it would be nice to see that each pt# belong to a racer, and not a vehicle. racers swapping pt's from class to class is a hassle with some of the scoring programs.
this is good. then again, any competition to a company that monopolizes the market is good. burn in hell, amb!
06-08-2006, 11:35 AM
#18
Originally Posted by Terry_S
Plus we're offering a custom spec for the case etc.
Also, are you interested in any hobby shops in the US carrying your product/service? Please pm me.
06-08-2006, 11:42 AM
#19
Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
If you were to offer a new PT from a new number that would be great, till then I don't really see a market.
UNLESS...we could probably get one PT for say my Touring Car...then get an i-PT for my 1/12th scale witht he same number. One less number I have it my melon? This would work or no?
UNLESS...we could probably get one PT for say my Touring Car...then get an i-PT for my 1/12th scale witht he same number. One less number I have it my melon? This would work or no?
Re 1/12th scale, or rather 4 cell racing. With 4 cell racing using heavier 1/10 electric touring/sedan cars existing PT's can suffer missed laps but with an i-PT this would not happen. It's the same with some ESC/servo combinations laps do get missed there are known 'issues'. I guess the market will decide if an improved PT is a good thing to have!
06-08-2006, 11:42 AM
#20
Tech Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MOOD;; feeling good not racing ,saving shed loads of money,lovely Tan i have aswell
Posts: 4,762
Terry
YGPM
YGPM
06-08-2006, 11:45 AM
#22
Originally Posted by seaball
economic argument aside, the cloning is awesome. if amb offered cloning as an option upon ordering (even for an adder), i would do it. my pt# is in alot of databases from going to the big races. it's nice get practice laps and a name with them for the internet race coverage year after year.
as a track manager, it would be nice to see that each pt# belong to a racer, and not a vehicle. racers swapping pt's from class to class is a hassle with some of the scoring programs.
this is good. then again, any competition to a company that monopolizes the market is good. burn in hell, amb!
as a track manager, it would be nice to see that each pt# belong to a racer, and not a vehicle. racers swapping pt's from class to class is a hassle with some of the scoring programs.
this is good. then again, any competition to a company that monopolizes the market is good. burn in hell, amb!
06-08-2006, 12:10 PM
#28
Originally Posted by or8ital
Terry,
What's the turnaround time?
What's the turnaround time?
