Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
CK25AR 1/12th car kit from Team CRC >

CK25AR 1/12th car kit from Team CRC

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree336Likes

CK25AR 1/12th car kit from Team CRC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2021, 06:32 PM
  #61  
Tech Master
iTrader: (41)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,919
Trader Rating: 41 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by vafactor
I’m unable to load and display a full setup sheet here, but I’ll try to describe my new car’s first outing setup: In an effort to copy the very heavy dampening that Andrew Knapp’s setup sheets usually indicate, I ran my new AR car with 60K lube on the kingpins and in the tubes and with 50wt oil in the shock. Doing so did seem to make the new car very stable and tossable. I went with Xenon 50/52 progressive front springs and started the day with just 1 shim under the new rear center pivot mounts. Everything else was pretty much box stock. The new car was remarkably good and surprisingly easy to drive. Maybe too easy. So after holding TQ after round 1, I added a second shim under the center pivots in hopes of adding a bit more steering aggression. It did. The car was great thru the rest of qualifying. But for the main the traction had come up just enough that I had to be extra careful to avoid any unforced errors. I tapped a couple of times but thankfully avoided making any big costly errors, so the new car was still able to win the main with relative ease. Next time out I’ll go back to just one shim under the rear center pivots and try adding extra steering up front rather than by raising the center pivot. After the race, the 60K still felt good on the kingpins but the tubes were feeling perhaps too stiff in my hands. So next time out I’ll back off to 30K in the tubes and maybe the kingpins too. Your results may vary. I prefer a very smooth, docile, and easy to drive car, and the new low center pivot seems to plant the rear better than the old car. The tried and true CRC front end provides plenty of options for adding more steering aggression, so that’s where I’ll focus my attention next time out. David, are you happy now?
Very happy now, Perry! Thanks for taking my ribbing so well. Hope you find the secret to posting the setup sheet. Maybe it has to do with file size since there is a limit on this site. This car requires a slightly different sheet than the old car. The one thing I didn't put on my sheet is that I used all three shims under the pivot. I am looking to raise it one more shim for the track in Bowling Green, OH. I don't get the rotation needed on that track.
davidl is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 04:57 AM
  #62  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,041
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

are ya,ll taking out the shims just on the chassis or both the rear pod and chassis?
BullFrog is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 09:35 AM
  #63  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,782
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Just had to order a new servo since I intentionally broke the tabs on one to test out something. No big worries tho. Going to turn my old 17.5 chassis into my new mod car and try to get back to wheeling mod 12th so I can try that in a big race down the road
phatboislim is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 10:15 AM
  #64  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by phatboislim
Just had to order a new servo since I intentionally broke the tabs on one to test out something. No big worries tho. Going to turn my old 17.5 chassis into my new mod car and try to get back to wheeling mod 12th so I can try that in a big race down the road
Might as well order a housing to save the old servo with the broken tabs. Typically pretty cheap.
RacinJ and LonnyJ1950 like this.
glennhl is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 10:43 AM
  #65  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Austintown ohio
Posts: 9
Default Weight of new car

hi just wondering if you have to add weight to new ck25ar car. Where I race Austintown hobby , I think you must be at 350 grams. Also where is the best place to put it? Thanks take care
Mel19 is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 11:11 AM
  #66  
Tech Master
iTrader: (47)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,081
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Mel19
hi just wondering if you have to add weight to new ck25ar car. Where I race Austintown hobby , I think you must be at 350 grams. Also where is the best place to put it? Thanks take care
There is no way anyone is getting a ready-to-race 1/12th scale to 350 grams. 730 grams is the ROAR minimum for GTP 1/12th scale. CRC's are very light. Depending on which motor, battery, servo, ESC and body you run, you could find yourself well below that (but nowhere near 350). Add weight to balance the chassis left-to-right first. I prefer to keep ballast needed to make weight in the center of the car as much as possible.
davidl likes this.
biz77 is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 12:57 PM
  #67  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Austintown ohio
Posts: 9
Default

I,am sorry brain fade I meant 750 g is the ck25ar that lighter than other 1/12 cars? I running gt12 rubber tires
Mel19 is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 04:14 PM
  #68  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Bern, N.C.
Posts: 1,700
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

If your club requires 750g, the challenge with the CK25AR will be finding enough places to add that much ballast. The CRC is easily the lightest of the current competitive offerings. I’ve got a custom brass plate under my battery just to reach our 730g minimum.
vafactor is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 04:18 PM
  #69  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,136
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Sounds like a good time for a body weight rule, stop this ultra throw away nonsense.
LonnyJ1950 likes this.
Racermac73 is offline  
Old 11-23-2021, 05:57 PM
  #70  
Tech Regular
 
MikeO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SoOrg
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by Mel19
I,am sorry brain fade I meant 750 g is the ck25ar that lighter than other 1/12 cars? I running gt12 rubber tires
build the car and mount your body and see. I know plenty of the CK25’s at 750 for GT12. You should be close
MikeO is offline  
Old 11-24-2021, 04:42 AM
  #71  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,839
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

My CK25 AR is 754g with the side rails and a 7000 battery setup for GT12-R. The rubber tires are slightly heavier than foam. We also run a 50g body weight rule. My Akura is 54g ready to go. The chassis that comes in the kit is heavier than the standard CK25. Slightly thicker I believe and fewer cutouts.
old_dude is offline  
Old 11-24-2021, 10:16 AM
  #72  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Team CRC
Thanks for the input and the nice words. We are curious if the "modernized a bit" simply means the conversion to metric screws, or something else? Regarding the metric fasteners, is it simply a matter of not owning imperial tools?

The 1/12th scale market was pioneered by American companies like Jomac, MRP, Leisure, Parma, Associated and Delta. These early manufactures set the standards for 1/12th scale cars with imperial hardware, inch sized bearings, axles and wheels. Even modern 1/12th cars produced in Europe and Asia still carry imperial parts and sizes; a 1/8th front axle, the 1/4" rear axle and imperial wheel bearing sizes. While you are not alone in the metric hardware request, we find it interesting the number of racers that want metric hardware in a kit while still using a .050 or 1/16" hex wrench for a pinion gear.

As a American company and only American company remaining making onroad kits here in the USA, it seems un-traditional to forget the heavy American heritage in 1/12th scale racing. Any way... who knows what the future will bring, maybe we will make the switch to metric.

Thanks for the input.
It is not only with owning the tools, but also its harder to keep/ buy inch screws if I lost some on the track
fotko is offline  
Old 11-24-2021, 01:38 PM
  #73  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,782
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

I also remember seeing a mod crc being run, I believe by the crc team...where is the setup sheet for that?
phatboislim is offline  
Old 11-24-2021, 05:05 PM
  #74  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Airwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,127
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by fotko
It is not only with owning the tools, but also its harder to keep/ buy inch screws if I lost some on the track
I recommend fastener-express.com to order quality screws.
hunterdawg likes this.
Airwave is offline  
Old 11-24-2021, 05:11 PM
  #75  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Airwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,127
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Team CRC
Thanks for the input and the nice words. We are curious if the "modernized a bit" simply means the conversion to metric screws, or something else? Regarding the metric fasteners, is it simply a matter of not owning imperial tools?

The 1/12th scale market was pioneered by American companies like Jomac, MRP, Leisure, Parma, Associated and Delta. These early manufactures set the standards for 1/12th scale cars with imperial hardware, inch sized bearings, axles and wheels. Even modern 1/12th cars produced in Europe and Asia still carry imperial parts and sizes; a 1/8th front axle, the 1/4" rear axle and imperial wheel bearing sizes. While you are not alone in the metric hardware request, we find it interesting the number of racers that want metric hardware in a kit while still using a .050 or 1/16" hex wrench for a pinion gear.

As a American company and only American company remaining making onroad kits here in the USA, it seems un-traditional to forget the heavy American heritage in 1/12th scale racing. Any way... who knows what the future will bring, maybe we will make the switch to metric.

Thanks for the input.
Honeslty I find the sliding pod way easier to setup than the Roche system...

In Europe pinion gear are using 1.5mm hex but I see you point, once you have a little bit stock and the correct tools, it is not a problem anymore. About the modernization I'm not so sure. This category exists for years and a lot of the experience we have is going to be totally useless with "modern" chassis: Take for instance the article of Cristian Tabush on traction-rolling. Most of the advices to prevent that are concerning the front, adding reactive caster, changing roll center, using long upper arms. It is working, but good luck to make it work on the latest Xray or Awesomatix.

I'm still using a CK25 for the moment but I'm not sure about the new pivot, what is the new feature? I've read it is about the roll center high, but isn't that something which was already possible with the old pivot system (which is working perfectly by the way)?
Airwave is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.