Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD >

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2014 | 09:48 AM
  #1726  
aptyk88's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,096
Default

Did anyone else watch drakes neo interview? His ebuggy had the battery tray forward with the esc in the back. How can I do this?
aptyk88 is offline  
Old 04-20-2014 | 11:14 AM
  #1727  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

Originally Posted by aptyk88
Did anyone else watch drakes neo interview? His ebuggy had the battery tray forward with the esc in the back. How can I do this?
Link please?
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-20-2014 | 01:32 PM
  #1728  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 150
Default

My buddy let Cody Hollis run his 3.0 in the ice breaker awhile back. He had Adam help with his setup and that's what they ended up doing with the battery tray and esc. Says it has much better balance this way.
Dagolf is offline  
Old 04-20-2014 | 08:27 PM
  #1729  
maddog9's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,303
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Adam drake interview
Attached Thumbnails TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD-image.jpg  
maddog9 is offline  
Old 04-20-2014 | 08:35 PM
  #1730  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

Interesting, I wonder if this is something that will stick.
I would imagine it's a fairly easy mod to do if you have the right tools....
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 09:19 AM
  #1731  
kufman's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,787
From: Elburn, IL
Default

So.. with the battery up front you are almost back to the old 2.0 and 1.0 setups, no?
kufman is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 09:35 AM
  #1732  
XXXDad's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (198)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,120
From: West Palm Beach, Florida USA
Red face Sigh...

Originally Posted by symmetricon
Interesting, I wonder if this is something that will stick.
I would imagine it's a fairly easy mod to do if you have the right tools....
Originally Posted by kufman
So.. with the battery up front you are almost back to the old 2.0 and 1.0 setups, no?
XXXDad is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 09:55 AM
  #1733  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

Originally Posted by kufman
So.. with the battery up front you are almost back to the old 2.0 and 1.0 setups, no?
Except the suspension setup and 15° hubs.....
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 10:43 AM
  #1734  
pimpedaccord's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 742
From: Massillon OH
Default

Looks like a clutch too
pimpedaccord is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 10:52 AM
  #1735  
rcgod's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,477
From: Blackfoot Idaho.
Default

Originally Posted by pimpedaccord
Looks like a clutch too
Good eyes! Looks like a traction drive like Tekno makes.
rcgod is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 12:18 PM
  #1736  
Durocken's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 253
From: N.J
Default

Would this setup be specific to this track/race? Cause it's a little disturbing that you buy a buggy that your told was designed a certain way for a reason (watch the amain video) then BOOOOM guys are changing the chassis layout, was Adam part of the testing for this buggy?
Durocken is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 12:32 PM
  #1737  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Yes, same here. This is really weird. The buggy was designed with batteries on the back, which is the opposite of what all the other cars on the market have. When the 3.0 e was released, I thought, TLR designers did their job and most certainly tried the two batteries position and after hours of testing, choosed the RIGHT position.
And then the pro drivers move the batteries the front...That actually looks like TLR wrongly designed the car :-).
I would be more than happy to have feedback from the team on this forum!
Geebee is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 01:14 PM
  #1738  
Salkin's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

Originally Posted by Geebee
Yes, same here. This is really weird. The buggy was designed with batteries on the back, which is the opposite of what all the other cars on the market have. When the 3.0 e was released, I thought, TLR designers did their job and most certainly tried the two batteries position and after hours of testing, choosed the RIGHT position.
And then the pro drivers move the batteries the front...That actually looks like TLR wrongly designed the car :-).
I would be more than happy to have feedback from the team on this forum!
Me too!
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 01:33 PM
  #1739  
rcgod's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,477
From: Blackfoot Idaho.
Default

I've ran some of his setups in the past and typical of a pro level driver they were pretty aggressive. I know my buggy is easy to drive and stable and has just enough steering to get around the track but definitely less than the 2.0. Especially on power.

Maybe he's trying to get more aggressive steering out of the car. I'd like to try it but can't see the video so idk what kind of mods it takes.
rcgod is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #1740  
Tarimon's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 116
From: Germany
Default Video

Originally Posted by rcgod
I'd like to try it but can't see the video so idk what kind of mods it takes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZgExqP3cg4

Last 2 Minutes...


.
Tarimon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.