Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD >

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2014 | 02:08 PM
  #1741  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

I have owned and driven quite a few different e buggies and I have found the fastest lap per lap and easiest to drive cars have had a weight bias of 45~50% front 50~50% rear. The best two car I have driven have been a converted HB D812, and the Losi E 3.0. Interestingly, they have near identical weight distribution....

Last edited by symmetricon; 04-21-2014 at 02:11 PM. Reason: stupid auto spellchecker
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 02:37 PM
  #1742  
XXXDad's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (198)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,120
From: West Palm Beach, Florida USA
Cool

Originally Posted by XXXDad
Originally Posted by symmetricon
Except the suspension setup and 15° hubs.....
Originally Posted by pimpedaccord
Looks like a clutch too
Originally Posted by Tarimon
XXXDad is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 05:43 PM
  #1743  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 353
Default

I got a pair of white wheels will trade for yellow... PM if interested...
Whitey_Wangster is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 08:06 PM
  #1744  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 528
From: Marble Falls, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by XXXDad
that's interesting! I wonder what prompted that? I mean, I assume they tried that configuration in the R&D stages of the 3.0E? It prolly has a ton of steering with that set up?

Lol damn I hate chasing that stuff, but who knows, may knock off another second or two per lap like that. I would like to hear some reviews about this configuration.
motoclay is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 09:10 PM
  #1745  
Casper's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,869
From: Orange, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by motoclay
that's interesting! I wonder what prompted that? I mean, I assume they tried that configuration in the R&D stages of the 3.0E? It prolly has a ton of steering with that set up?

Lol damn I hate chasing that stuff, but who knows, may knock off another second or two per lap like that. I would like to hear some reviews about this configuration.
Yes they did test it and yes the kit configuration was determined to be the best setup with the battery and its locations where they are. Everyone has there own preferences and tries new things though.
Casper is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 10:15 PM
  #1746  
royvp's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 104
From: Mb,Cdn
Default

I was looking at the picture and in my preseason rebuilds right now.it wouldn't be hard to move it forward.I was thinking it is done instead of using the brass weight.
royvp is offline  
Old 04-21-2014 | 10:44 PM
  #1747  
Tarimon's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 116
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
Yes they did test it and yes the kit configuration was determined to be the best setup with the battery and its locations where they are. Everyone has there own preferences and tries new things though.
Casper, what´s about the clutch system? Can you tell something about it? It is mentioned in the manual, that there sometime something could be...


.
Tarimon is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 04:14 AM
  #1748  
Tech Master
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,426
From: Rochester,IN
Default

We have ran against some of the 3.0's that swapped the the tray around and I didn't see any advantage except maybe the way it feels to the driver. We don't run brass weight either. Tried it and took it out. Tyler said it made car too heavy for the way he likes to drive.
RandyJones is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 05:31 AM
  #1749  
Salkin's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

These are listed as option parts on the TLR site:

http://www.tlracing.com/Products/Rel...s&SubCategory=

Are these not just "normal" gear box sets or? Why listed under "option parts"?
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 08:48 AM
  #1750  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 192
From: Michigan
Default

For those who have had both the 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and the 3.0e how do they compare? I currently have a 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and am on the fence about buying the 3.0e.
R.M.S is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 09:09 AM
  #1751  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,593
From: St Louis
Default

Originally Posted by R.M.S
For those who have had both the 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and the 3.0e how do they compare? I currently have a 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and am on the fence about buying the 3.0e.
I have both and they are not the same. The nitro conversion is a better drive. The E-3.0 is very ridged and does not seem to handle the rough stuff as well.

I am all most tempted to get a nitro chassis and conversion for mine.
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 09:28 AM
  #1752  
Salkin's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
I have both and they are not the same. The nitro conversion is a better drive. The E-3.0 is very ridged and does not seem to handle the rough stuff as well.

I am all most tempted to get a nitro chassis and conversion for mine.
Very strange

Could it not be, that the different configurations just suits different drivers? Just like changing other setup options?

Can't believe that TLR released a dedicated E buggy, that in general handles worse than a converted.

Maybe it suits you better and some other, but I go to believe that the E 3.0 overall is a better design.
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 09:58 AM
  #1753  
symmetricon's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,882
From: houston
Default

Some of you guys are reading into this far too much. Read through the whole thread and you will see that when the dedicated E buggy came out most preferred it over than the nitro converted version. There us nothing wrong with the buggy in its current stock configuration. Didn't Phend win the ROAR 2013 Nationals with it........
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 10:16 AM
  #1754  
Salkin's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

Originally Posted by symmetricon
Some of you guys are reading into this far too much. Read through the whole thread and you will see that when the dedicated E buggy came out most preferred it over than the nitro converted version. There us nothing wrong with the buggy in its current stock configuration. Didn't Phend win the ROAR 2013 Nationals with it........
Yes, you're right
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014 | 12:44 PM
  #1755  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
From: South Africa, Durban
Default

the E is definitely better for me, I can't see what the old nitro conversion did that the new E can't do better...
akshayp14 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.