Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree5Likes

SC10 4x4 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2011 | 07:34 AM
  #1321  
Racecrafter's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,140
From: RC Mecca
Default

Originally Posted by Toiffel
Anyone use the new air flow bodies yet?? Do they really work??
Yes. They work "better" but they aren't the cure all for kite-ing.

Like this one?: Flotek
Attached Thumbnails SC10 4x4 Thread-sc10-4x4-build-004.jpg   SC10 4x4 Thread-sc10-4x4-build-007.jpg  
Racecrafter is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:09 AM
  #1322  
VegasHB's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 521
Default

Anyone notice that the back side of the belt rubs along the bottom belt cover quiet a bit? There's really no way to pick it up without maybe using the 19t drives.

Wonder if a belt dressing lube would help reduce friction?
VegasHB is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:28 AM
  #1323  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Ridley
This is not correct.

A bladder shock will have more pack than an emulsion shock, with the same oil and same piston...but thats because the oil doesn't become an emulsified froth in a bladder shock. When the air and oil mix it becomes "lighter" in viscosity. While going lighter in oil increases traction and decreases pack, it does so equally in both style shocks, just far more consistently in a bladder shock as there's no way to correctly gauge the amount of air is actually in your emulsion build, and there's also no changing from start to finish as the oil and air are in different stages of emulsion.

Having a bladder allows you to build your shocks with more, and more consistent rebound. Faster rebound creates more traction as it keeps your tire on the racing surface. It also keeps your shocks consistent from start to finish of a race, as the air and oil never mix.

IMO, there is little, if any, reason to ever do an emulsion build over a bladder build.


Sorry to correct you ..


The reason bladders have more pack is not due how much air gets mix with the oil ..


When the piston push's up against the bladder that makes more pack .
The piston must stretch the bladder a little to be able to move up inside the shock body....


Remove the bladder and the piston does not have to fight to go up and thus more traction & less pack...

The rebound for the shock can be set the same for both , thus no difference in performance between the two in regards to rebound...

Last edited by Wild Cherry; 05-17-2011 at 09:40 AM.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:34 AM
  #1324  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Keep'N It Cool
No wrong, The overdrive pulley is designed for loose tracks. It is designed to pull your truck out of the corner with the front tires. The sensitivity of your steering in the front is going to be controlled by the weight of your diff fluid. The lighter the fluid the more sensitive your steering is going to be.

I ran both the normal and overdrive this last weekend at our very dry local track. It did help to have the overdrive in to keep the truck strait coming out of corners and going down the straits.




I said more reactive & more steering..
With the overdrive it pulls more when on power & steer's more coming out of the turn .


The reason I don't recommend the 19T for outdoor is you never really need more steering when outdoors due to bigger turns &
less traction compared to a small indoor track...
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:38 AM
  #1325  
JEFFs SC10's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,044
From: Orlandooooo, Fl
Default

Thank you Jesus, the UPS guy dropped a box off at my house.

Is the Savox 1257 enough servo?

Dimensions(mm): 40.3x20.2x37.2
Weight(g): 52.4
Speed(@4.8V sec/60): .09
Torque(@4.8V oz-in): 111.1
Speed(@6.0V sec/60): .07
Torque(@6.0V oz-in): 138.9
Gear: Titanium & Aluminum
Bearing: 2BB
Case: Aluminum
25 Tooth Spline


or should I wait to get a 1258?

Dimensions(mm): 40.3x20.2x37.2
Weight(g): 52.4
Speed(@4.8V sec/60): .10
Torque(@4.8V oz-in): 133.3
Speed(@6.0V sec/60): .08
Torque(@6.0V oz-in): 166.6
Gear: Titanium & Aluminum
Bearing: 2BB


Case: Aluminum
JEFFs SC10 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:44 AM
  #1326  
1Fastpede's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,757
From: McKinney,TX
Default

the 57 should be fine. i use a 147oz and its awesome.
1Fastpede is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:45 AM
  #1327  
1Fastpede's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,757
From: McKinney,TX
Default

so i got some HT pads here.. but it seems everyone is using them in diff places. whats everyones thoughts?
1Fastpede is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:55 AM
  #1328  
Cameron Kellogg's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,776
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by fasted
so i got some HT pads here.. but it seems everyone is using them in diff places. whats everyones thoughts?
Needs to be on the outer slipper disc for the rear. The front is fine. Took mine apart after racing this weekend and the rear is defiantly slipping a lot more that the front. My front pad almost looked new the rear (outer) pad had some pretty good glaze on it.
Cameron Kellogg is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:56 AM
  #1329  
t4mania's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 541
From: Virginia
Default

I'd wait for the 1258..little extra torque never hurts..
t4mania is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 08:59 AM
  #1330  
SaladFork's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,349
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by JEFFs SC10
Thank you Jesus, the UPS guy dropped a box off at my house.

Is the Savox 1257 enough servo?

Dimensions(mm): 40.3x20.2x37.2
Weight(g): 52.4
Speed(@4.8V sec/60): .09
Torque(@4.8V oz-in): 111.1
Speed(@6.0V sec/60): .07
Torque(@6.0V oz-in): 138.9
Gear: Titanium & Aluminum
Bearing: 2BB
Case: Aluminum
25 Tooth Spline


or should I wait to get a 1258?

Dimensions(mm): 40.3x20.2x37.2
Weight(g): 52.4
Speed(@4.8V sec/60): .10
Torque(@4.8V oz-in): 133.3
Speed(@6.0V sec/60): .08
Torque(@6.0V oz-in): 166.6
Gear: Titanium & Aluminum
Bearing: 2BB


Case: Aluminum
I use the 1257 in my SCTe which works but the extra torque of the 1258 would have been a better choice. But the 1257 will work fine... So get building! I want pics in 2 hours of a complete build. LoL
SaladFork is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 09:22 AM
  #1331  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 240
Default

I want to see some pics people!
Super Coupe is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 09:28 AM
  #1332  
Toiffel's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,169
From: Westchester, NY
Default Just finished

Toiffel is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 09:49 AM
  #1333  
JEFFs SC10's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,044
From: Orlandooooo, Fl
Default

nice paint!
JEFFs SC10 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 09:50 AM
  #1334  
racer1812's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,739
From: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Sorry to correct you ..


The reason bladders have more pack is not due how much air gets mix with the oil ..


When the piston push's up against the bladder that makes more pack .
The piston must stretch the bladder a little to be able to move up inside the shock body....
Remove the bladder and the piston does not have to fight to go up and thus more traction & less pack...

The rebound for the shock can be set the same for both , thus no difference in performance between the two in regards to rebound...
The piston isn't intended to ever hit the bladder, and doesn't if you run the shock boots. The manual tells you to run up limiters if you don't run the boots for this reason.
racer1812 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 09:53 AM
  #1335  
Revoke36's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 80
From: SF Bay Area
Default

URC video review http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7OJA...&feature=feedu
Revoke36 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.