RC10B4.1 FT/WC
Closing the argument on b4.2...
-New box will have cav's car on it (not much different from the old box)
-Same chassis
-Big bores
-Hexes
-VTS Slipper
-Aluminium steering rack
-Possibley new shock towers
As for the t4.2 and the sc10.2 i believe they'll be getting the new Short Course Buggy front arms as well as the stuff listed above. There is a 90% chance that announcements for the new kit will be made around late Jan or early Feb after Reedy Race and I would assume the new kits will appear on shelves late Feb early March. Unless Associated decides to do something weird I'm pretty sure this is how things are going down.
-New box will have cav's car on it (not much different from the old box)
-Same chassis
-Big bores
-Hexes
-VTS Slipper
-Aluminium steering rack
-Possibley new shock towers
As for the t4.2 and the sc10.2 i believe they'll be getting the new Short Course Buggy front arms as well as the stuff listed above. There is a 90% chance that announcements for the new kit will be made around late Jan or early Feb after Reedy Race and I would assume the new kits will appear on shelves late Feb early March. Unless Associated decides to do something weird I'm pretty sure this is how things are going down.
I just started running mod and my front launches in the air off every jump, especially the triple. I'm running a Reedy Sonic 7.5, 81/22. I'm running the worlds setup with 1.6 pistons 30/27.5.
I've tried the following, softer frt spring, lowered frt ride height 23/24. And before anyone says it, I'm not on the power as I leave the jump.
The other thing is that the motor doesn't feel like it has any rip. Some of the fast guys encouraged me to gear up, so I went from 81/21 to 22,23, and finally 24. The motor felt like it was finally coming to life after 81/24.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
I've tried the following, softer frt spring, lowered frt ride height 23/24. And before anyone says it, I'm not on the power as I leave the jump.
The other thing is that the motor doesn't feel like it has any rip. Some of the fast guys encouraged me to gear up, so I went from 81/21 to 22,23, and finally 24. The motor felt like it was finally coming to life after 81/24.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
I'm going to get hate mail on this, but.....
Although I admire his racing skills, I'm seriously sick of seeing Pudge's paint scheme splashed everywhere (he stole it from Kinwald anyway).
I hope Maifield wins this year so we get a different paint scheme on the box

Suspended
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
I'm not sure if I could agree with you anymore that's 100% true lol. I hope hartson wins it.
the carbo ubrace holds up much better. To my knowledge the rear carbo tower was never updated for lipos. So today's packs are a little taller and AE only updated the plastic tower. The wolf packs are lower and can use the carbon tower.
Normal plastic creates a lot more flex than carbon. So any time you're using carbon you're going to take away flex (and possibley grip) from the car. Carbon parts on the b4 are used as stiffeners. To me it seems carbon helps a lot on high bite to smooth out the handling since more flex seems to make the car feel less consistent throughout the course of a corner. I always run a carbon u brace, top plate, and front arms. I'll go back and fourth between rear arms. There are three different stiffness rear arms (regular b4 plastic, b44 rear arm, carbon rear arm) and they are soft, medium, and hard respectively.
As far as shaving the u brace that has nothing to do with this topic. Shaving the u brace lowers your link and in turn raises your roll center. The reason people shave the u brace is because they want to raise the roll center more normally because they are switching to the c hub tower which is 2mm lower than the "a" hub.
As far as shaving the u brace that has nothing to do with this topic. Shaving the u brace lowers your link and in turn raises your roll center. The reason people shave the u brace is because they want to raise the roll center more normally because they are switching to the c hub tower which is 2mm lower than the "a" hub.



