Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Hot Bodies Cyclone >

Hot Bodies Cyclone

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Hot Bodies Cyclone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:19 AM
  #18481  
Tech Master
iTrader: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,238
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

tamiya legacy b4, sorex 36r pre-mounts, track temps around 110 degrees. Car is easy to drive smooth and never loose. Med grip track. I like to dive into the corners but the car atm tends to push. Is there a setup change for me to create a little more over steer?

Front
pink springs
40wt AE oil
4 position on front tower
outside hole on front pro4 arm
1.4 front sway bar
1.5 front block
droop 2mm on blocks
1.0mm under all front suspension blocks.
4mm ackerm
3mm spacer under front camber tie rod
2 of camber
5.5mm ride height

Rear
silver springs
40wt AE oil
#2 pistons
4 on the shock tower
middle hole on old pro 4 arm
1.2 rear sway bar
3.0 rear block
droop 3-3.5mm
1.5 mm shims under all suspension blocks.
rear hub spacers 0.75 in front 2.0 in rear
2mm spacer under rear camber tie rod
arms all the way back (spacers in front of arms)
2 degrees of camber
6mm ride height
goots is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 02:42 AM
  #18482  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
warnos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 524
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by decibels
The cvd's are better in front as until you reach point of chatter they will be smoother and give more corner speed!! and they don't chatter until atleast 85 to 90 % so pretty good. the version 2 will chatter at prob 70 to 75 % lock
Thanks I have a pair of the standard HB MIP CVDs but also have a spare single which I puchased with some spare parts.. it has a titanium end (the threaded side that goes into the wheel which is usually black) anyone know what this is off?? or who makes it?? It looks just like the HB MIP CVD but has a titanium end..

Also I have heard that there is a Losi MIP CVDs which fit the cyclone.. is this correct?

Cheers
warnos is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 09:50 AM
  #18483  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 990
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

That would help if you could give us a bit more track info. but here are my suggestions to try...

Originally Posted by goots

Front
pink springs
40wt AE oil
4 position on front tower Try #3 on the tower
outside hole on front pro4 arm
1.4 front sway bar
1.5 front block Try 2.5 deg block it should give you more initial turn in better
droop 2mm on blocks
1.0mm under all front suspension blocks. Go up to 1.5mm to get quicker responce
4mm ackerm
3mm spacer under front camber tie rod Try start with 2.0mm
2 of camber
5.5mm ride height If the track is not bumpy, try 4.5-5.0mm

Rear
silver springs
40wt AE oil
#2 pistons 1.1mm 3 holes would work better if you want the car aggresive
4 on the shock tower
middle hole on old pro 4 arm
1.2 rear sway bar
3.0 rear block
droop 3-3.5mm
1.5 mm shims under all suspension blocks.
rear hub spacers 0.75 in front 2.0 in rear change it to 2.0/front, 0.75/rear
2mm spacer under rear camber tie rod Try 1.5mm or stay with 2.0mm and then go #3 hole on tower.
arms all the way back (spacers in front of arms) Should be 2.0mm in front of arm, 0.75 behind of arm.
2 degrees of camber
6mm ride height
Let me know after you try it.
Thanks,
Hi-LowBlow is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 10:06 AM
  #18484  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (13)
 
Korey Harbke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,176
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

+1 on all the changes Hiro mentioned.

-Korey
Korey Harbke is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 10:22 AM
  #18485  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
trickd122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Korey Harbke
+1 on all the changes Hiro mentioned.

-Korey
So Korey or Hiro

Based on what was said with the setup suggestions. It seems as though there is a relationship that works best with a certain amt of camber gain vs. shock position.
trickd122 is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 10:37 AM
  #18486  
Tech Master
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,981
Questions??

Could anybody tell me is any good if running with short camberlink?
In fact somebody from 4000Kv gave me the setup then i didn't run yet with it in my 3000KV class, due my car is still totally disassemble.

Best regards
mac853 is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 11:03 AM
  #18487  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 990
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by trickd122
So Korey or Hiro

Based on what was said with the setup suggestions. It seems as though there is a relationship that works best with a certain amt of camber gain vs. shock position.
Yes, there is a relation that works the best with a certain suspension leverage. When we think about camber angle, there are two different things that are "static camber" and "dynamic camber (camber change)".

I suggest you to try as many combo as possible and feel the difference. You should feel like laying down the shocks like less camber change while the standing shock likes more camber gain.

Also, it also depends where the static (as 1G) piston position is.

Hope it helps.
Hi-LowBlow is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 11:31 AM
  #18488  
Tech Master
iTrader: (20)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,238
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hi-LowBlow
That would help if you could give us a bit more track info. but here are my suggestions to try...



Let me know after you try it.
Thanks,
Ill give it a try this weekend since its a by week. The track is a little bumpy with banked sweepers on each end. Thats why I keep the front ride height to either 5.5 - 6mm cuz it just scrapes and drag in those sections. Heres a link to the track and a youtube link to our 17.5 A main.

boxcarracing.org/RC_Car_Racing/rc_car_racing.html#RCraceinfo
youtube.com/user/ocsdriver
goots is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 07:46 AM
  #18489  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
trickd122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default Terrible handling HELP!!!!!!

Issue off power loose:

Tires Cs27

Front
Orange Serpent springs (19.5)
35wt Losi oil 3 hole 1.1
4 position on front tower
1.4 front sway bar
1.5 front toe block
1.5mm under all front suspension blocks.
4mm ackerm
3mm spacer under front camber tie rod
1.5 of camber
5mm ride height
-1 toe
Droop 6mm
Ride height: 5mm

Rear
silver springs
35wt AE oil
3 hole pistons
4 on the shock tower
1.2 rear sway bar
3.0 rear block
droop 5mm
1.5 mm shims under all suspension blocks.
rear hub spacers 2.0 in front 0.75 in rear
1 mm spacer under rear camber tie rod
2.0nn in front of arms 0.75 in the rear
2 degrees of camber
5.5mm ride height
trickd122 is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 08:39 AM
  #18490  
Tech Master
iTrader: (88)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,687
Trader Rating: 88 (100%+)
Default

is your rear droop over ride height? if so i would think taking some out would keep the car from getting on the nose when the weight transfers
joey is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 08:43 AM
  #18491  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
charlie_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 9,927
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joey
is your rear droop over ride height? if so i would think taking some out would keep the car from getting on the nose when the weight transfers
Off topic..kinda...how are those Sweep tires compared to Sorex?
charlie_b is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 09:38 AM
  #18492  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
trickd122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 509
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joey
is your rear droop over ride height? if so i would think taking some out would keep the car from getting on the nose when the weight transfers
Turn the droop screws IN or OUT lol
and I measured the droop using droop block not over ride height...
trickd122 is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 03:05 PM
  #18493  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by charlie_b
Off topic..kinda...how are those Sweep tires compared to Sorex?
Given the choice I would go with sorex, I find the sweeps a little bit unpredictabl on the edge. Sorex32 seem to work in just about every situation.
michael.branth is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 03:09 PM
  #18494  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by trickd122
Issue off power loose:

Tires Cs27

Front
Orange Serpent springs (19.5)
35wt Losi oil 3 hole 1.1
4 position on front tower
1.4 front sway bar
1.5 front toe block
1.5mm under all front suspension blocks.
4mm ackerm
3mm spacer under front camber tie rod
1.5 of camber
5mm ride height
-1 toe
Droop 6mm
Ride height: 5mm

Rear
silver springs
35wt AE oil
3 hole pistons
4 on the shock tower
1.2 rear sway bar
3.0 rear block
droop 5mm
1.5 mm shims under all suspension blocks.
rear hub spacers 2.0 in front 0.75 in rear
1 mm spacer under rear camber tie rod
2.0nn in front of arms 0.75 in the rear
2 degrees of camber
5.5mm ride height
I ve had a similar issue, the xray guide recommends more akerman effect- less spacers, I ve not tried this but its what I will be trying next week. May be give that a shot?
michael.branth is offline  
Old 02-11-2010, 03:14 PM
  #18495  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 105
Default New cyclone wish list:

I am not one for the new car talk.......but what would you like on the new or next generation cyclone, for me:

Lipo Chassis ( exotek style...maybe)

Motor mount some thing like mi4 to keep tweak equal side to side and extra adjustment for weight balence, even better if this could be a 'mod' for curennt chassis

More tunabilty for suspension blocks, may be new hole in chassis but also hole so that currennt blocks would fit.

That would be it for me
michael.branth is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.