Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree18Likes

Xray NT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2007, 12:01 AM
  #1501  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lomita,Ca
Posts: 9
Default

Question. Are most of you fellas satisfied with the tension your getting with the middle belt? just curious since I'm still building mine & I tested the adjustment on the belt tension and the tightest position is not sufficient enough or am I wrong?
john dewey is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 12:58 AM
  #1502  
Tech Elite
 
Sow&Steady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Va Va Voom!
Posts: 4,104
Default

Originally Posted by john dewey
Question. Are most of you fellas satisfied with the tension your getting with the middle belt? just curious since I'm still building mine & I tested the adjustment on the belt tension and the tightest position is not sufficient enough or am I wrong?
I'm satisfied ... my tensioning arm is set at around the mid-point. If I move it to the very back, the belt gets too taut and really tight.
Sow&Steady is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 01:22 AM
  #1503  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lomita,Ca
Posts: 9
Default

Thanks! I'll go by your word then since it was you who gave me alot of good tips and tricks on your review on the nt1 on your site hehe
john dewey is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 01:26 AM
  #1504  
Tech Fanatic
 
gansei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bander, Seoul
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by john dewey
Question. Are most of you fellas satisfied with the tension your getting with the middle belt? just curious since I'm still building mine & I tested the adjustment on the belt tension and the tightest position is not sufficient enough or am I wrong?
tight belt tension had a little loss in acceleration. But the response is good.

But too loose belt tension cause on-power understeering in corner-exit.

proper tension is good!!
gansei is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 01:29 AM
  #1505  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lomita,Ca
Posts: 9
Default

thanks for explaining both sides!
john dewey is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 02:07 AM
  #1506  
Tech Champion
 
asw7576's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,792
Default

I set all the belts quite tight. Responsive

You can relax the middle belt ---> more turning power on full throttle.

Last edited by asw7576; 07-04-2007 at 02:57 AM.
asw7576 is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 02:50 AM
  #1507  
Tech Elite
 
Sow&Steady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Va Va Voom!
Posts: 4,104
Default

Originally Posted by john dewey
Thanks! I'll go by your word then since it was you who gave me alot of good tips and tricks on your review on the nt1 on your site hehe
Like Gansei says, don't set the middle belt too tight or too loose, somewhere in between is good.
Sow&Steady is offline  
Old 07-04-2007, 01:42 PM
  #1508  
Tech Adept
 
CIMRI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by sns820
I have the same motor package I havent even run the 353 .you will be pleasantly with the practice motor.
http://forum.teamxray.com/viewtopic.php?t=5411
CIMRI is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:00 AM
  #1509  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 272
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default clutch

I'm trying to setup the xray clutch and ran into small problem on the novarossi 353, are you doing any special tricks to get it to fit because it seems like the crank is too short (29.51mm) if you use the nova supplied 7mm collet, and even after filing it down to 5mm I end up with too many shims on the clutch gap to even space the bell off the shoe and then the endplay is non existent with the xray supplied end insert (6mm, vs kyosho's 7mm)
brianhatesnitro is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:55 AM
  #1510  
Tech Champion
 
asw7576's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,792
Default

Originally Posted by brianhatesnitro
I'm trying to setup the xray clutch and ran into small problem on the novarossi 353, are you doing any special tricks to get it to fit because it seems like the crank is too short (29.51mm) if you use the nova supplied 7mm collet, and even after filing it down to 5mm I end up with too many shims on the clutch gap to even space the bell off the shoe and then the endplay is non existent with the xray supplied end insert (6mm, vs kyosho's 7mm)
Alternative #1: You can buy shorter collete from Mugen Seiki or G4S

Alternative #2: You can add 0.2mm shim before the collete you have in now. Team Magic has this crankshaft's outer bearing shim.

Alternative #3: If you insist to use 7mm original collete from Novarossi, You can buy Mugen Seiki H0756 ( the last part that hold the thrust bearing ). H0756 is longer than Xray.

BTW, check / read again the Xray manual about clutch gap vs end play before going to alternatives.
asw7576 is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 10:09 AM
  #1511  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (29)
 
mtveten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,781
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

With the 25T side pulley I have been running my side belt at max tension which seems to be barely enough to keep it from skipping under braking.

Mark
mtveten is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 12:07 PM
  #1512  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 272
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by asw7576
Alternative #1: You can buy shorter collete from Mugen Seiki or G4S

Alternative #2: You can add 0.2mm shim before the collete you have in now. Team Magic has this crankshaft's outer bearing shim.

Alternative #3: If you insist to use 7mm original collete from Novarossi, You can buy Mugen Seiki H0756 ( the last part that hold the thrust bearing ). H0756 is longer than Xray.

BTW, check / read again the Xray manual about clutch gap vs end play before going to alternatives.
#3 seemed to be the best option for me because I already have a few kyosho clutches around. Even after filing down the collet to 5mm (from 7mm, and this was hard to keep a square collet) I ended up needing too many shims to get the clutch bell off of the clutch shoe to be able to set the end play at all so the piece that holds the thrust bearing is still better.
brianhatesnitro is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 01:18 PM
  #1513  
Tech Elite
 
teamgp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampton/VA Beach USA
Posts: 2,089
Default

Has anyone tried the new 4mm chassis yet? Especially on a high grip track. If so, how did it handle and did you have to make any changes to your setup?

Anyone tried the 4mm chassis, as well as the standard chassis with the Multi-flex engine mount? I'd be interested to know the differences between each type of *stiff* chassis setup as well.
teamgp is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 01:45 PM
  #1514  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 235
Default

Originally Posted by teamgp
Has anyone tried the new 4mm chassis yet? Especially on a high grip track. If so, how did it handle and did you have to make any changes to your setup?

Anyone tried the 4mm chassis, as well as the standard chassis with the Multi-flex engine mount? I'd be interested to know the differences between each type of *stiff* chassis setup as well.
Barry ran the 4mm chassis @ the 301 race. You might ask him what he thought about it.
MBlackketter is offline  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:54 PM
  #1515  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
royfan33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 296
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I finally got time to paint a new body for the NT1. I'm not a pro painter by any means, but I'm happy with it. I'm just learning to use liquid mask and an airbrush. At least I can get rid of the left overs from the previous car...Now I just need to trim the body posts, and true some tires for the weekend. I get to race Sat and Sun after almost a month off. I'm stoked for sure
Attached Thumbnails Xray NT1-xray-nt1003.jpg   Xray NT1-xray-nt1008.jpg  
royfan33 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.