NEW XRAY T2
11-30-2005, 07:41 PM
#287
It looks as though the holes on the front bulkheads would allow the old upper bumper brace to be mounted, it turn allowing the old sway bars to work. We'll know for shur when we get it.
11-30-2005, 07:48 PM
#288
Originally Posted by rcguy2477
It looks as though the holes on the front bulkheads would allow the old upper bumper brace to be mounted, it turn allowing the old sway bars to work. We'll know for shur when we get it.
11-30-2005, 07:54 PM
#290
Originally Posted by kewdawg
I was thinking Xray had another swaybar mount design in mind. Having to use the old bumper mount/brace to install the swaybar seems counter productive.
11-30-2005, 08:28 PM
#292
Tech Master
...and did you notice that the wheel axle on the rear is hollow while the fornt is solid 
11-30-2005, 08:35 PM
#294
Tech Regular
ha ha too late Quinn i seen that,you have to get up pretty early to put one over on me 
"We'll know for shur when we get it".
"We'll know for shur when we get it".
11-30-2005, 08:45 PM
#295
Originally Posted by bosfan
ha ha too late Quinn i seen that,you have to get up pretty early to put one over on me
"We'll know for shur when we get it".
"We'll know for shur when we get it".
11-30-2005, 08:47 PM
#296
Originally Posted by andrewdoherty
I've never owned a car with the following feature but imagined it would be something XRAY would consider with the self proclaimed title of the luxury touring car. I dont ever like the idea of sanding a perfectly good CF chassis to keep batteries from shorting/cutting. Do the plastic inserts that some car makers use in the battery slots work well? It seems it would be a brilliant solution to the turbulant battery sizes. Rather than sanding more/less on a chassis, XRAY could just manufacture a different size cut out on the inserts. Does this make sense? Why is no one doing this?
I imagine it is to make the changes in shock position inctrementally smaller. The holes are too close together to make them individual holes. This may be due to a cahnge in geometry which ncessitates the closer together hooles. just a guess . .
I imagine it is to make the changes in shock position inctrementally smaller. The holes are too close together to make them individual holes. This may be due to a cahnge in geometry which ncessitates the closer together hooles. just a guess . .
the Yokomo BD has the plastic trays that you put into the battery slots. it works great. raises the battery a tad. (1mm) BUT it saves you the trouble of having to file the slots.
11-30-2005, 08:47 PM
#297
Check it out!!!http://www.teamxray.com/teamxray/m_i...9bdc109f5296c3
Crazy new stuff..Click on specs.
Crazy new stuff..Click on specs.
11-30-2005, 08:50 PM
#299
Tech Regular
if you go back a few posts that was jason's comment 
11-30-2005, 08:55 PM
#300
Bob - is Stormer's pre-order process similar to SpeedTech in that confirmation is requested before the purchase is charged, or is it charged as soon as the kits arrive?
Car looks beautiful. At first glance it doesn't look much different than the FK05, appart from the bulkheads, but there appear to be numerous small changes.
I am so incredibly dissapointed that they didn't design new shocks, but who knows, maybe they did and it just isn't obvious.
Josh
Car looks beautiful. At first glance it doesn't look much different than the FK05, appart from the bulkheads, but there appear to be numerous small changes.
I am so incredibly dissapointed that they didn't design new shocks, but who knows, maybe they did and it just isn't obvious.
Josh