RB Concept Engine Thread..
#1727
The Shark9 is a 3 port engine and it has a balanced crank in it. It also has the much lower cooling head on it so it may run a little warmer.
Shark10 no longer has a balanced crank and they have lowered the exhaust port on it to help with fuel mileage, it is also not a 3 port like the Shark9. It is more similar to the B10
A lot of people think the Cross10 is the same engine as the Shark9 and this is not true either. The Cross does not have the balanced crankshaft in it.
#1728
Tech Initiate
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 43
ok, I'm sure this question was ask before bu,t I don't feel like reading 115 pages yeah I know I'm lazy lol.
Most people now days run the os or ninja engines, I have been out for a few years and decide to get back into the hobby, I currently run a c6 with a jp1 and 7mm venturi and getting 7 maybe 7.5 mins per tank, I feel that my c6 can hang with the new os and ninja engines and at some parts of the tracks have more power but not as fuel friendly as the os any pointers on what to do? My c6 runs great it just don't have that fuel economy like the new ones, I was wondering if the new rb like the b10 has the same power of the c6 with better fuel economy? I currently run the c6 in a mugen mbx5r, I tried the new mbx6 but can't get used to it so I'm back to the 5 any help I'll appreciated.
Most people now days run the os or ninja engines, I have been out for a few years and decide to get back into the hobby, I currently run a c6 with a jp1 and 7mm venturi and getting 7 maybe 7.5 mins per tank, I feel that my c6 can hang with the new os and ninja engines and at some parts of the tracks have more power but not as fuel friendly as the os any pointers on what to do? My c6 runs great it just don't have that fuel economy like the new ones, I was wondering if the new rb like the b10 has the same power of the c6 with better fuel economy? I currently run the c6 in a mugen mbx5r, I tried the new mbx6 but can't get used to it so I'm back to the 5 any help I'll appreciated.
#1729
Well there are two reasons your C6 is getting poor fuel mileage. The first is the JP1 pipe, while the pipe does make decent power it makes an RB an all out fuel hog. You would be doing yourself a huge favor by getting the 2045 pipe.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
#1730
Tech Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 282
From: Somewhere in Igloo Country
Well there are two reasons your C6 is getting poor fuel mileage. The first is the JP1 pipe, while the pipe does make decent power it makes an RB an all out fuel hog. You would be doing yourself a huge favor by getting the 2045 pipe.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
Last edited by Nick411; 12-25-2010 at 05:17 PM.
#1731
Well there are two reasons your C6 is getting poor fuel mileage. The first is the JP1 pipe, while the pipe does make decent power it makes an RB an all out fuel hog. You would be doing yourself a huge favor by getting the 2045 pipe.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
Next thing holding back your run time is the MBX5, that car is very heavy and has an inefficient drive train. With a 2045 you could probably get up to 8.5 minutes on the MBX5 but if you go back to the 6 you might even see those runtimes go to 9 or 10 depending on track and driver.
As far as getting a B10, that engine is a great engine but is not going to be a ton different than your C6. if the C6 is still in good condition you can save some money by sticking with it and getting a 2045 pipe, and both 192 and 198 headers.
Ive always liked the C6/2045/6.5mm venturi combo
#1732
Tech Initiate
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 43
Thanks chris I'll look into getting one soon I do have an os 2045 and I have a 192 header I think, is the os 2045 the same of the rb 2045?
Nick-Thanks for the info
on the buggy yes I noticed the weight issues when driven the two of them I just drive the 5 better then the 6, the 6 seems more unsettled to drive but that may have to do with the weight but thats issue to another thread.....
Nick-Thanks for the info
on the buggy yes I noticed the weight issues when driven the two of them I just drive the 5 better then the 6, the 6 seems more unsettled to drive but that may have to do with the weight but thats issue to another thread.....
#1733
Thanks chris I'll look into getting one soon I do have an os 2045 and I have a 192 header I think, is the os 2045 the same of the rb 2045?
Nick-Thanks for the info
on the buggy yes I noticed the weight issues when driven the two of them I just drive the 5 better then the 6, the 6 seems more unsettled to drive but that may have to do with the weight but thats issue to another thread.....
Nick-Thanks for the info
on the buggy yes I noticed the weight issues when driven the two of them I just drive the 5 better then the 6, the 6 seems more unsettled to drive but that may have to do with the weight but thats issue to another thread.....
#1735
The stock OS 2050 pipe has a short manifold close to a 2.8" centerline. The RB 192 is much longer with a centerline close to 3.3". Don't think that mix and match job will yield good results.
#1738
Tech Rookie
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
From: socal
which engine is going to get the best fuel mileage. (with good power)
I need to run 20 min. main with 1 stop
I run on midsize loamy track, descent traction (revalation raceway) s. cal, with many pro drivers
need bottom end power/ punch. but smooth and controllable.
i currently run a ceo modded c6 7mm venturi with 2045 pipe and 1351-192p header, alum clutch 1.0 spring rb #7 plug. All suggestions appreciated
I need to run 20 min. main with 1 stop
I run on midsize loamy track, descent traction (revalation raceway) s. cal, with many pro drivers
need bottom end power/ punch. but smooth and controllable.
i currently run a ceo modded c6 7mm venturi with 2045 pipe and 1351-192p header, alum clutch 1.0 spring rb #7 plug. All suggestions appreciated
#1739
Tech Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 282
From: Somewhere in Igloo Country



2Likes