Go-Tech Engines Thread
#8222
Rex
#8223
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 868
how long is the warranty on go engines?
I found this one: http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...etor-Main-Body
would this fit on a 3 port turbo head engine?
I found this one: http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...etor-Main-Body
would this fit on a 3 port turbo head engine?
#8224
Pete.
#8225
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 69
From: Austin, TX
rather then saying it will not work why not tell him why it will not work ? with no shim in you have .3 of squish adding 1 .1 will give a total of .4 if your only running 20% a .1 shim may all that be needed ...
IMO i would just run .2 shim give you a toatl of .5 med hot plug
IMO i would just run .2 shim give you a toatl of .5 med hot plug
Originally Posted by 22racer
The shim is softer than the head button or the sleeve and acts like a gasket.
In your setup I would run 1 alum and 1 thin brass or even just the aluminum.
Rex
In your setup I would run 1 alum and 1 thin brass or even just the aluminum.
Rex
#8226
Tralalala MG66 in the post from massive today..Just couldn't resist the ceramic bearing upgrade for after the run in either...
I found out from mark today that the new engines come with 2 different rods..A heavier one fitted for the run in and the spare included with the motor..these gen 5.5 rods are the new "knife edge " type ..lighter and more streamlined apparently..
I presume this is for all the new engines and not just the MG66....
I found out from mark today that the new engines come with 2 different rods..A heavier one fitted for the run in and the spare included with the motor..these gen 5.5 rods are the new "knife edge " type ..lighter and more streamlined apparently..
I presume this is for all the new engines and not just the MG66....
Won't be long now !!! Lucky bugger 
I've also seen the clamping nuts come together before clamping the carby. If you grind a small amount of material away from the ends (the two surfaces that touch when you tighten the screw, NOT the surface that contacts the carby), it will allow the clamping nuts to tighten onto the carby.
Pete.
Pete.
#8228
Tech Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 377
2047 in standard form is weak on bottom ans def. not suitable for 7p. 0801 is much better but lacks top when compared to the 2047. So I'd take the 2047 pipe and 0801 header (or any longer length header) and cope it with the 2047 pipe and you have a winner for the 7p. Some say it's even better than the 2072. To me the 2072 is best for the 5p and the truggy engines and the 0801 or 2047 + long header is the pipe for 7p.
Regarding runtimes the 0801 is slightly better than 2047 or 2072 if you can live with the slightly restricted top.
Last edited by Poinas2; 08-11-2009 at 10:13 AM. Reason: added info
#8229
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 69
From: Austin, TX
Has anyone found a better plug than an OS #8 for the 3 Port Sports? Thinking about trying a couple different medium and medium/hot plugs but figured I would try and narrow it down some.
Last edited by cLaWz; 08-11-2009 at 02:12 PM.
#8230
2047 in standard form is weak on bottom ans def. not suitable for 7p. 0801 is much better but lacks top when compared to the 2047. So I'd take the 2047 pipe and 0801 header (or any longer length header) and cope it with the 2047 pipe and you have a winner for the 7p. Some say it's even better than the 2072. To me the 2072 is best for the 5p and the truggy engines and the 0801 or 2047 + long header is the pipe for 7p.
Regarding runtimes the 0801 is slightly better than 2047 or 2072 if you can live with the slightly restricted top.
Regarding runtimes the 0801 is slightly better than 2047 or 2072 if you can live with the slightly restricted top.
It's a nice smooth power band all the way through.
Pato - good to see you featuring in the podiums. Keep up the good work.
#8232
#8233
Hey Pato,
as for runtimes I found the 0801 only slightly better than the 2047 -0801 header combo. For me both are around 9-11min depending on the track clutch, plug,restrictor etc but the power band on the 2047-0801header combo is far better( my opinion)
Adrian
as for runtimes I found the 0801 only slightly better than the 2047 -0801 header combo. For me both are around 9-11min depending on the track clutch, plug,restrictor etc but the power band on the 2047-0801header combo is far better( my opinion)

Adrian
#8234
+1 on all the above. I run the 2072 on my modded 5 port and it ROCKS big time compared to all the other pipes. The 2047 with the 0801 or similar longer header is a killer on the 7 Port (better then the 2072 IMO). It gives the 7 a boost in bottom end, and still lets the 7 ports legendary top end do it's thing.
It's a nice smooth power band all the way through.
Pato - good to see you featuring in the podiums. Keep up the good work.
It's a nice smooth power band all the way through.
Pato - good to see you featuring in the podiums. Keep up the good work.
but GO 2047 is more bigger than 0801,2072 to 13mm.
if central hole bigger than 10mm,the power band is between at top to mid. then noise is more too.and fuel consumption is more too.
if central hole average at 10mm,the power band,noise,fuel consumption are conform to IFMAR rules.
so each tuned pipes have different set up to GO TECH engine.it's depend on your favor.



2Likes