Community
Wiki Posts
Search

8T 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009 | 04:33 AM
  #2476  
l3asher's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 956
From: Broussard, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by jzemaxx
I thought I read on a post that someone made an aftermarket bearing that goes in the stock location. Possibly boca or acer or advid??
All three that you mentioned do, but if you want to go to a biigger bearing you have to mod the hub.
l3asher is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 09:20 AM
  #2477  
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,575
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by jzemaxx
I thought I read on a post that someone made an aftermarket bearing that goes in the stock location. Possibly boca or acer or advid??
Yup, they do, but they will only extend the life. They will still fail in the end. Much better to just have J-DUB mod some hubs for you. All other brands use the 8x16x5 bearing, for some reason losi decided to use an 8x14x4 bearing. For a buggy, that is ok, but they don't hold up in a truggy!
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 09:24 AM
  #2478  
jzemaxx's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,586
From: North Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by JAMMINKRAZY
Yup, they do, but they will only extend the life. They will still fail in the end. Much better to just have J-DUB mod some hubs for you. All other brands use the 8x16x5 bearing, for some reason losi decided to use an 8x14x4 bearing. For a buggy, that is ok, but they don't hold up in a truggy!
Strange that the 8T 1.0 has the same bearings (part #) and people have run them now for several years without much talk of failure.
jzemaxx is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 09:26 AM
  #2479  
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,575
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by jzemaxx
Strange that the 8T 1.0 has the same bearings (part #) and people have run them now for several years without much talk of failure.
YEAH, I can't say I ever had a failure on my 1.0 truggy. I believe it is something to do with the change to zero offset wheels.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 09:52 AM
  #2480  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 139
From: Boise, ID
Default

I was thinking about the bearing issue the other day, and why I never had problems w/ my 1.0. I believe it all has to do with leverage.

A half-offset wheel only has half the width of the wheel to leverage against the outside bearing. A zero-offset wheel has the entire width of the wheel leveraged against the outside bearing. As you know, the longer the lever, the more the mechanical force is multiplied at the other end (in this case, the outside wheel bearing). I drew up a little diagram to help visualize what I'm talking about:



-Howard
pur3evil is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:05 AM
  #2481  
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,575
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by pur3evil
I was thinking about the bearing issue the other day, and why I never had problems w/ my 1.0. I believe it all has to do with leverage.

A half-offset wheel only has half the width of the wheel to leverage against the outside bearing. A zero-offset wheel has the entire width of the wheel leveraged against the outside bearing. As you know, the longer the lever, the more the mechanical force is multiplied at the other end (in this case, the outside wheel bearing). I drew up a little diagram to help visualize what I'm talking about:



-Howard
Exactly what I was thinking, just didn't explain it as well as you!
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:07 AM
  #2482  
jzemaxx's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,586
From: North Alabama
Default

That would mean its double the force with zero offset wheels if that theory applies.
jzemaxx is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:14 AM
  #2483  
Electric Dave's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
From: Lakeville, CT
Default

I posted a few days ago about my problems with the 8T 2.0 and it eating my Steering Servo Gears for lunch (4 sets!). Anyway I finally got ahold of "Bill" in Losi Tech Support. He is definitely good at diffusing, which was appreciated because when I left my first message I was pretty angry. The long and short of it is that he said the 2.0 Servo saver plastic was "hard on servos" and that it didn't actuate as easily as the 1.0 plastic. So he is sending me the 1.0 plastic parts. I did take mine out of the truck last night and it was all but impossible to make it actuate. I don't know if mine was just a particularly bad mold or whatever but I'm fairly certain that this is the cause of my servo issues. I'll know for sure the next time I race (hopefully Saturday) and I will post the result here. I have yet to have a race day without going through at least 1 set of gears.

If you have an 8T 2.0 I'd suggest you remove the servo saver assembly and check to see if you can make it actuate. Hopefully the newer trucks don't have the same problem mine (one of the early one's) did but with a simple test you can be sure without blowing servo gear sets. If yours doesn't feel right, call Losi and they will make it right by sending a 1.0 plastic set.
Electric Dave is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:28 AM
  #2484  
Integra's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,489
Default

the 1.0's are the one's that dont actuate very well....the issue with the 2.0 is the stiff spring....the 2.0 plastics work Awesome...the way they molded the 2 peices allows them to work like they should...the 1.0's had dull flat edge's that didnt like to "actuate" very well....so imo your going backwards....and im confused as to why bill would send you this way.
Integra is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:33 AM
  #2485  
Electric Dave's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
From: Lakeville, CT
Default

Originally Posted by Integra
the 1.0's are the one's that dont actuate very well....the issue with the 2.0 is the stiff spring....the 2.0 plastics work Awesome...the way they molded the 2 peices allows them to work like they should...the 1.0's had dull flat edge's that didnt like to "actuate" very well....so imo your going backwards....and im confused as to why bill would send you this way.
I already have the 1.0 spring, have had it since very early when I read about that issue. From what I can tell, the 2.0 pieces I have are flat edge, no bevel to them. The 1.0 pieces have a beveled edge which makes them actuate with less force. I do not yet have the 1.0 parts but this was explained to me at the track this weekend. A guy had modified his 2.0 parts to have the bevel edge and I could easily actuate his saver.

I will post up when I get the parts.
Electric Dave is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:34 AM
  #2486  
Toiffel's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,169
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Integra
the 1.0's are the one's that dont actuate very well....the issue with the 2.0 is the stiff spring....the 2.0 plastics work Awesome...the way they molded the 2 peices allows them to work like they should...the 1.0's had dull flat edge's that didnt like to "actuate" very well....so imo your going backwards....and im confused as to why bill would send you this way.
+1 the spring is what need to be changed
Toiffel is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:36 AM
  #2487  
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,506
Default

what servo are you running first off and next is 1.0 acuated too much due to dull edges and not deep onough v so the 2.0 has deeper v my friends are all running the 2.0 buggy spring in thier truggys to get it to acuate a little more or just loosen your spring down close to the bottom shoulc fix the problem
jewn_beef is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:45 AM
  #2488  
Electric Dave's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
From: Lakeville, CT
Default

I thank you all for the comments. I'm only stating what I've been told and what I can see with my own parts. I've been running JR Z9000T servo's with my 8T 2.0. When I blew the first set of gears, I installed the 1.0 spring. Blew that and I backed the nut all the way down (not hitting the chassis but as far as you can go).

Having removed it yesterday, I can confirm that I all but could not actuate the saver in my hands. At the track Saturday, I met a racer who had told me the deal with the bevel edge and all that. He had his 2.0 saver assembly out (he had a spare) and I could easily actuate his after his bevel edge mod.

I'm not ruling out the possibility that my 2.0 saver has/had (I tried the bevel edge thing myself last night) some kind of unique mold defect. In all fairness, my 2.0 buggy has been just fine and all I've done on that so far is the 1.0 spring and backing the tension down as far as I can go without hitting the chassis. I didn't ask for the 1.0 plastic, Bill suggested it.
Electric Dave is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 11:07 AM
  #2489  
-WHEELMAN-'s Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (267)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,511
From: Redlands, California
Default

Originally Posted by Integra
the 1.0's are the one's that dont actuate very well....the issue with the 2.0 is the stiff spring....the 2.0 plastics work Awesome...the way they molded the 2 peices allows them to work like they should...the 1.0's had dull flat edge's that didnt like to "actuate" very well....so imo your going backwards....and im confused as to why bill would send you this way.
So you recommend using a 1.0 spring in the saver? I just got my roller anything else you recommend? I noticed you guys were discussing these 2.0 are ride height sensitive therefor what should it be? Thanks for the help.
-WHEELMAN- is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 11:55 AM
  #2490  
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,575
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by Electric Dave
I thank you all for the comments. I'm only stating what I've been told and what I can see with my own parts. I've been running JR Z9000T servo's with my 8T 2.0. When I blew the first set of gears, I installed the 1.0 spring. Blew that and I backed the nut all the way down (not hitting the chassis but as far as you can go).

Having removed it yesterday, I can confirm that I all but could not actuate the saver in my hands. At the track Saturday, I met a racer who had told me the deal with the bevel edge and all that. He had his 2.0 saver assembly out (he had a spare) and I could easily actuate his after his bevel edge mod.

I'm not ruling out the possibility that my 2.0 saver has/had (I tried the bevel edge thing myself last night) some kind of unique mold defect. In all fairness, my 2.0 buggy has been just fine and all I've done on that so far is the 1.0 spring and backing the tension down as far as I can go without hitting the chassis. I didn't ask for the 1.0 plastic, Bill suggested it.
my 2.0 plastic bottom piece, 2.0 aluminum upper piece and 2.0 spring actuate just fine with the spring backed down. I think you must have gotten a defective piece. Also there was a problem with molding of the 2.0 lower piece. They were molded so that the spring wouldn't seat properly in the spring cup. Might be your problem.

I would definately stick with the 2.0 plastics. They have much better geometry than the 1.0's do. You may just need to replace yours with a new set of 2.0's.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.