Roche Rapide P12 Evo 1/12th Competition Kit
#241
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 211
From: TN
Can anyone give me the lowdown on the lightweight axle and hubs: 410042 & 410043? When and why would these be preferred over the standard spool axle? I currently have a diff and am looking to try out a spool. I have the option of purchasing either, standard or lightweight.
Standard solid axle and hub
Standard solid axle and hub
#245
the 'standard' spool axle is longer and works in F1 / 200mm configurations
#247
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 537
From: N/A
Not really. You're not always aware of what you don't know. That's why I pitched my question to others, so I'm not overlooking anything. Not being aware of the timeline, as was pointed out in the reply before yours, it appears that there are two simultaneous options, which would suggest pros and cons of each.
#249
outside of 17.5 racing we had better luck using the traditional steering setup (non-bell crank)
#250
Tech Master
iTrader: (52)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,455
From: Spokane, WA
We run the Reedy spec 13.5 motors, basically the same power as a ROAR 17.5, on a very small (55x32) and tight gray carpet track. I recently switched from the bell crank to the traditional setup and went slower despite dropping 36 grams from the car - about 16 from the switch to the traditional floating servo mount and 20 grams of ballast I didn't need as I was able to run my huge SMC ESC more towards the center of the chassis. The car also felt easier to drive with the bell crank. Given that info, if you still think the traditional setup is the better route to take, I'm open to suggestions on how to make it better.





91Likes