Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno RC ET410 Thread >

Tekno RC ET410 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Like Tree469Likes

Tekno RC ET410 Thread

Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2018 | 12:57 PM
  #451  
Cain's Avatar
Tech Legend
iTrader: (304)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 35,029
From: West Fargo, North Dakota
Default

I have to say, the Sworks hingepins we have been using have been excellent and are pretty cheap. I don't know if the replacement tekno pins are better, but when we went to the sworkz pins at the time, we haven't had to change them out.
Cain is offline  
Old 09-11-2018 | 06:16 PM
  #452  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 399
Default

Thinking about getting one of these, but in the videos I've seen looks like its loose in the rear end at times and or has the initial understeer unless you unload the rear end with the brakes like on my EB410. Maybe just track conditions but seems to be the similar in most videos I've watched?
AJrollin is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 06:26 AM
  #453  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by AJrollin
Thinking about getting one of these, but in the videos I've seen looks like its loose in the rear end at times and or has the initial understeer unless you unload the rear end with the brakes like on my EB410. Maybe just track conditions but seems to be the similar in most videos I've watched?
the truck shares the same characteristics as the buggy. In kit setup it will feel very loose if you let off the throttle. The key is to just stay in throttle. You don't have to keep it pegged or anything, just don't let it go to neutral. If you don't like this handling, which most of us didn't, you can easily tune it out.
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 06:47 AM
  #454  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
the truck shares the same characteristics as the buggy. In kit setup it will feel very loose if you let off the throttle. The key is to just stay in throttle. You don't have to keep it pegged or anything, just don't let it go to neutral. If you don't like this handling, which most of us didn't, you can easily tune it out.
Are you running max sweep/kick to settle the car off power in tight corners?

I've only got about 5 min of practice on my ET410 this past Saturday on turf before I stripped a servo, I have since dropped in a 1/8 buggy servo and been trying to tune out the front end... when I stripped the servo it was after braking from WOT on the straight and diving into a 90° corner where the car got a little too snappy and hit the inside board. Probably my fault with just trying to learn how to drive a new truck, but I definitely needed to dial back my D/R to almost 75% before it was drive-able... I'm thinking I have tons of D/R to add back after going max sweep/kick, but not sure if there are other things to try?

I hope to get some more run time tonight at the club, also will compare lap times between SCT tires with closed cell foams vs ST tires with open cell foams.

EDIT... I also added 1.9mm bars on both the front/rear... waiting on Red springs (fr/rr) to arrive
billdelong is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 07:12 AM
  #455  
mtbwrench's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 484
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Welp... I'm joining the club! Picked this up from my LHS yesterday. Going to put an RSX and Gen3 8.5 in it for now, then see how things evolve classing wise. I must say, the build is very nice, and the instructions are some of the best I've seen.

mtbwrench is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 10:12 AM
  #456  
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (147)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,404
Default

has anyone tried SC10 4x4 springs to try and solve the rear droop/springs too short issue?
Cain likes this.
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 10:16 AM
  #457  
EbbTide's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,264
From: Bay Area, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by RC*PHREAK
has anyone tried SC10 4x4 springs to try and solve the rear droop/springs too short issue?
It seems most folks are seeing the issue go away after a couple runs. I don't know exactly why but so far this has been the "fix".
EbbTide is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 10:51 AM
  #458  
Cain's Avatar
Tech Legend
iTrader: (304)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 35,029
From: West Fargo, North Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by RC*PHREAK
has anyone tried SC10 4x4 springs to try and solve the rear droop/springs too short issue?
thats a thought ... Yeah I'd be curious personally how well they would work too.
Cain is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 12:01 PM
  #459  
nitro2be's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 544
From: Corona CA.
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
the truck shares the same characteristics as the buggy. In kit setup it will feel very loose if you let off the throttle. The key is to just stay in throttle. You don't have to keep it pegged or anything, just don't let it go to neutral. If you don't like this handling, which most of us didn't, you can easily tune it out.
so what's the easy way to tune it out please?
nitro2be is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 01:03 PM
  #460  
mtbwrench's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 484
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
the truck shares the same characteristics as the buggy. In kit setup it will feel very loose if you let off the throttle. The key is to just stay in throttle. You don't have to keep it pegged or anything, just don't let it go to neutral.
So it's like a porsche?

I'm no tuning expert, but I'd be willing to bet a lot of this is due to the fact that there is so little weight in back. Keeping on the throttle pushes more weight transfer to the rear end and helps it dig,
mtbwrench is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 01:21 PM
  #461  
AJH387's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 995
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by mtbwrench
So it's like a porsche?

I'm no tuning expert, but I'd be willing to bet a lot of this is due to the fact that there is so little weight in back. Keeping on the throttle pushes more weight transfer to the rear end and helps it dig,
Pretty much what I was thinking too. The truck seems to be front-weight biased. Regardless of what any stats may say (never looked them up) I just feel like it is a bit nose-heavy feeling, compared to my EB48SL, when I switch back and forth. Not a bad thing, just a different driving style is needed. But maybe if there is a different set-up that I should try, then I'd willing to.
AJH387 is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 02:01 PM
  #462  
Cain's Avatar
Tech Legend
iTrader: (304)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 35,029
From: West Fargo, North Dakota
Default

wonder if it would benefit from that exotek weight in the rear.
Cain is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:20 PM
  #463  
Matthew_Armeni's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,900
From: Temecula
Default

Originally Posted by AJrollin
Thinking about getting one of these, but in the videos I've seen looks like its loose in the rear end at times and or has the initial understeer unless you unload the rear end with the brakes like on my EB410. Maybe just track conditions but seems to be the similar in most videos I've watched?

If the car is too stable off power for you a good starting point would be to center the front arms with the wheelbase shims and remove any sweep you might be running. The car should feel more neutral into turns without the front bone having any angle on it. Another thing would be to run thinner front and/or center diff oil or a lighter front swaybar.
Cars are typically easier for most people to drive if it's setup to be more stable into turns, so we tuned the trucks starting setup more towards that.

Originally Posted by mtbwrench
So it's like a porsche?

I'm no tuning expert, but I'd be willing to bet a lot of this is due to the fact that there is so little weight in back. Keeping on the throttle pushes more weight transfer to the rear end and helps it dig,
The difference with a Porsche is that it's extremely rear weight biased, if you let off the throttle the rear swings around like a pendulum, like how rear motor 2wd buggies drive.
Matthew_Armeni is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 05:04 PM
  #464  
ttr_racer's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,472
From: Illinois
Default

A 22-4 2.0 chassis protector installed backwards on the et410. And look at the template in came out of, those little strips is all I had to trim. It's not perfect but I had it here at my workbemch.

ttr_racer is offline  
Old 09-12-2018 | 08:05 PM
  #465  
RCSteveH's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 412
From: Anywhere there’s a track
Default

My ET48 had a baby 😆
billdelong likes this.
RCSteveH is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.