Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree211Likes

Tamiya TRF103

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2018 | 07:49 AM
  #16  
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,057
From: Chatham Ontario Canada
Default

Ohh, link or T-plate. Very cool!
DavidNERODease is offline  
Old 01-31-2018 | 07:33 PM
  #17  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNERODease
Ohh, link or T-plate. Very cool!
I hope there are no compromises in the chassis having both configurations available. There's a big hole in the chassis when the T-plate isn't used. I guess it'll just be the inherent chassis flex.

Still very nice though. First time I'm getting a look at it on screen instead of my phone. It's got a lot of nice little details.
viking44 is offline  
Old 01-31-2018 | 08:07 PM
  #18  
f1larry's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,420
From: Buffalo Grove, IL
Default

Does it look to you like it will allow for a transverse mounted shorty battery? Hopefully it does.
f1larry is offline  
Old 02-01-2018 | 06:40 AM
  #19  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by f1larry
Does it look to you like it will allow for a transverse mounted shorty battery? Hopefully it does.
It looks like it will fit a transverse battery with either the T-plate or the links. You just have to move the links outwards and it looks like Tamiya provides you with holes for that.
DavidNERODease and aracefan like this.
viking44 is offline  
Old 02-01-2018 | 06:14 PM
  #20  
ShadowAu's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Somewhere you've never heard of
Default

Originally Posted by jgil089
A lot of those parts look carried over from the TRF102, would it be possible to convert the 102 to allow sideways battery using some of the 103 parts?
I don't know where you get that idea from... I own a trf102 and the only parts that look the same to me are the top deck/tbar mounts and the diff/axle/hubs
madjack and aracefan like this.
ShadowAu is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 10:11 AM
  #21  
SuperFastSnail's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Tamiya was first to release any formula class. Now that the RC community has made it a real racing class, Tamiya will continue to develop and enhance the formula chassis.
SuperFastSnail is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 10:23 AM
  #22  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,959
Default

Just about everyone at my local track was running Tamiya until early 2015. Probably 80-90% until early 2015.

Nice to see Tamiya getting back to being serious.
Dan is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 03:53 PM
  #23  
JayL's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,111
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Dan
Just about everyone at my local track was running Tamiya until early 2015. Probably 80-90% until early 2015.

Nice to see Tamiya getting back to being serious.
Really? 'my local track' ?? on carpet??? hehehe


hope the new car works!
JayL is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 04:07 PM
  #24  
texastc's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,599
From: Forney Texas
Default

I have a TRF101 and its the best feeling car I have ever owned. That said I have a new Fenix Mistral that I'm told will make me forget I ever had such feelings. I'm looking forward to hearing and seeing how this car does when it comes out.
texastc is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 04:15 PM
  #25  
texastc's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,599
From: Forney Texas
Default

I have a TRF101 and its the best feeling car I have ever owned. That said I have a new Fenix Mistral that I'm told will make me forget I ever had such feelings. I'm looking forward to hearing and seeing how this car does when it comes out.
texastc is offline  
Old 02-08-2018 | 05:39 PM
  #26  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,959
Default

Originally Posted by JayL
Really? 'my local track' ?? on carpet??? hehehe


hope the new car works!
Correction, "former" local track
Dan is offline  
Old 04-08-2018 | 11:03 AM
  #27  
mtveten's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,846
Default

Looking through the manual shows the car to not accomidate the transverse battery placement of of newer cars or as much camber/caster adjustment as other current generation cars. The new front end is clearly heavier and trades the 1deg camber settinging for a 12deg caster option. The t-bar mounts like on the f104 but with the pitch pivot point behind the battery instead of underneath.
mtveten is offline  
Old 04-08-2018 | 11:47 AM
  #28  
kentech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,112
Default

Regarding transverse battery position, here is Kiyo Suzuki's car from the TITC.

f1larry, Flipside6900 and Stargek like this.
kentech is online now  
Old 04-08-2018 | 12:09 PM
  #29  
mtveten's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,846
Default

Yes it can be easily modified to fit but out of the box the cross brace is is shaped for inline use only.


For many the apeal of a new tamiya f1 is a the ability to have a car that is tcs legal and competative with other manufactures. Modifying the car to make it competative with others results in tcs racers continuing to need 2 cars, 1 for tcs and 1 for everything else.
mtveten is offline  
Old 04-08-2018 | 05:27 PM
  #30  
Kregger's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,731
From: Long Island, NY
Default

you really can't tell from the picture if anything was modified to fit, all it looks like is he mounted the battery transversely and held it in place with tape. Since he was running the link set-up, the t-bar was a non factor.
Kregger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.