USGT
#3721
Tech Addict
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 638
Please help me make sense of you contradictory statements. They're rather confusing.
You want narrower bodies yet at the same time you are seemingly frustrated with body tuck situtaions. ???????????????
Dale = Protoform
#3722
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,854
From: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
A true 190mm body on a 190mm car seems to tuck way less than a 200mm body on a 190mm car. A 190mm body looks better on a 190mm car than does a 200mm body on a 190mm car...this was my main point. Your PF Lexus is really nice looking but the darn thing just tucks the rear body with ease....this is a 200mm body on a 190mm car. Now from what Eric just said about the new body it looks like groundhog day all over again. My suggestion was to make the newer/next bodies true 190mm like your Mazda or LTC bodies are wide. This might all be a "moot" point as it might have more to do with the shape than it does with being 200mm wide. Hope this clears up what I was trying to get across the first time.
#3723
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 299
From: Redlands, CA
Whereas on a normal touring car body, this section goes pretty much straight back, leaving it out of the path of the tire and not as prone to tuck. If we made these bodies at 195mm like a TC body front and rear and flattened out the lower rear section to fix this, I'm sure we'd get called out for trying to optimize these for pure track performance instead of scale looks.
Now that being said, our next USGT body is not a supercar, so I don't foresee this being an issue. For the LFA and PFM-10 unfortunately it's something we'll have to work around with stiffeners etc.
Last edited by Matt Trimmings; 05-19-2016 at 09:29 PM.
#3725
This is the more important factor than width: it has more to do with the shape of these 2 bodies. Both the LFA and PFM-10 are supercars with very short rear ends. In order for these bodies to look more realistic, a few things need to happen: they need to be a wider around the rear wheel opening (to give it that supercar stance), and then narrow up very quickly behind the rear tires with the bottom of the tire actually exposed (see pic).
Whereas on a normal touring car body, this section goes pretty much straight back, leaving it out of the path of the tire and not as prone to tuck. If we made these bodies at 195mm like a TC body front and rear and flattened out the lower rear section to fix this, I'm sure we'd get called out for trying to optimize these for pure track performance instead of scale looks.
Now that being said, our next USGT body is not a supercar, so I don't foresee this being an issue. For the LFA and PFM-10 unfortunately it's something we'll have to work around with stiffeners etc.
Whereas on a normal touring car body, this section goes pretty much straight back, leaving it out of the path of the tire and not as prone to tuck. If we made these bodies at 195mm like a TC body front and rear and flattened out the lower rear section to fix this, I'm sure we'd get called out for trying to optimize these for pure track performance instead of scale looks.
Now that being said, our next USGT body is not a supercar, so I don't foresee this being an issue. For the LFA and PFM-10 unfortunately it's something we'll have to work around with stiffeners etc.
I do love the look of the shell. Dale, you did an awesome job sir, but I agree with the guys who would have preferred it to be a true 190mm, even if that makes the tendency to body tuck even greater.
#3726
I didn't body tuck after I remove a little more behind the rear wheel ...


Anyway, like my dad was saying, go faster so you won't get rear ended
One personnel tips : Try cutting the wing. I prefer the car with the wing cut at 9.5mm (side height) than the original cutting line.


Anyway, like my dad was saying, go faster so you won't get rear ended
One personnel tips : Try cutting the wing. I prefer the car with the wing cut at 9.5mm (side height) than the original cutting line.
Last edited by Penz316; 03-26-2015 at 12:31 PM.
#3727
Your dad is funny.I need to try that half sized lexan wing. I went with the big HPI molded one, but I think the high weight and additional drag may have hampered performance slightly. I was worried that the cut down wing wouldn't provide enough downforce, but it didn't seem to hurt you at all. Your car was dialed.
#3728
Your dad is funny.I need to try that half sized lexan wing. I went with the big HPI molded one, but I think the high weight and additional drag may have hampered performance slightly. I was worried that the cut down wing wouldn't provide enough downforce, but it didn't seem to hurt you at all. Your car was dialed.
The next step was trying without a wing but I didn't have the time lol
the week-end went so quickly!
#3730
This set :
http://www.teamgravityrc.com/store1/...tegory=6824082
Available at the local track (pre-mount, pre-glue). They have perform very (very) well.
Hope to see you at the track Alain !
http://www.teamgravityrc.com/store1/...tegory=6824082
Available at the local track (pre-mount, pre-glue). They have perform very (very) well.
Hope to see you at the track Alain !
#3732
We had some nice USGT cars last night at Indy RC for Friday night club racing. I think both of these are McAllister bodies. Jeremiah's Riley Daytona and Houston's MX-P Daytona. I thought they looked awesome on the track, and even better up close. Indy RC website is: www.IndyRC.Homestead.com

Last edited by Matt Trimmings; 05-19-2016 at 09:29 PM.
#3735





6563Likes