Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B4.2 Thread >

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2013 | 11:56 PM
  #9991  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by jswo
Im mainly wanting to know about how much weight to add to chassis with a 17.5 and shorty. I tried it without any weight other than ballast and didnt like it. I had 1 full pad in front and the esc on shelf. Still have stock shock setup but thinking of trying 32.5 and 27.5. Also wondering about pistons, only extras I have are 3x1.4 tapered. The track is topsoil medium traction in central us.


You should try moving the battery all the way forward , no pad in front .

steers best this way ....

Start with no ballast other then 7grams in rear corner of chassis & the team ballast next to transmission.

Only add weight on the front servo if you can wheelie on the straights or traction rolling , weight on the nose is good for really high traction conditions as a rule .

Experiment using a little less weight next to transmission if you wish for more traction .
I only use 7 gram next to the gear box myself .


Use the 3 x 1.4 contour in the front shocks & get some 2 x 1.6 contour for the rear ...

WhY contour pistons ?????( this is for turbo)

They rebound faster , the car sets up for the turns faster with less delay . You really notice on small double or tables that have a sharp turn on the landings.

The car will turn instead of stalling on landing . No waiting for it to finish landing and then turn.

Apologies , best way I can describe how they perform & why you would like to try .....

Use the set up I just posted cept think you may like greens springs front & rear more & also 30W in the rear shock.


If the set-up is too loose & steers too much ?

switch the carbon rear arms for plastic B4 arm.

start running the car at 24mm ride height , only lower the height if traction is very good or med high ...

Last edited by Wild Cherry; 10-02-2013 at 12:13 AM.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 04:16 AM
  #9992  
Flip boy's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 109
From: Colorado
Default

[QUOTE=rc car guy;12595919]
Originally Posted by Flip boy
how do you know its your top shaft and not something else that became more apparent when you switched top shafts
I have three 4.2s and the one in question has a new idler ,diff gear and aluminum top shaft with a triad slipper(avid centering kit) the other 2 are whisper quiet and bone stock,also im just asuming......and it is only a low speed pitch issue
Flip boy is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 04:18 AM
  #9993  
Flip boy's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 109
From: Colorado
Default

[QUOTE=Waflet;12595993]
Originally Posted by Flip boy

Hideeho
If it's an MIP al top shaft look @ the teeth very closely. I had 5 teeth that I had to file down because there was a lip on the drivers side edge. If it's avid check any way. Everything I've seen from them has been spot on, but mistakes do happen.
I will check that out thanks.
Flip boy is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 04:51 AM
  #9994  
Grasschopper's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,647
From: Central PA
Default

[QUOTE=Flip boy;12596519]
Originally Posted by rc car guy

I have three 4.2s and the one in question has a new idler ,diff gear and aluminum top shaft with a triad slipper(avid centering kit) the other 2 are whisper quiet and bone stock,also im just asuming......and it is only a low speed pitch issue
Also check that your top shaft and make sure it is straight. There have been several reports of bent top shafts in this thread and the thread specifically about the kit. The way AVID ships the kits (padded bag via USPS) leaves some room for bending during shipping. If it's bent contact AVID, they have replaced them for others.
Grasschopper is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 05:06 AM
  #9995  
BIGSKI15's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 570
From: Western PA
Default

the avid shafts come bent... I sent two back and got replacements that were also bent and a few guys that I race with also had bent shafts with the avid kit. Slide the motor away from the spur then spin your wheels. You will see the treaded portion wobble.

[QUOTE=Flip boy;12596519]
Originally Posted by rc car guy

I have three 4.2s and the one in question has a new idler ,diff gear and aluminum top shaft with a triad slipper(avid centering kit) the other 2 are whisper quiet and bone stock,also im just asuming......and it is only a low speed pitch issue
BIGSKI15 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 05:07 AM
  #9996  
BIGSKI15's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 570
From: Western PA
Default

Double post

Last edited by BIGSKI15; 10-02-2013 at 06:32 AM.
BIGSKI15 is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 05:43 AM
  #9997  
Cappy's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,321
Default

Make sure the motor plate is straight . That will make noise if it bent
Cappy is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 05:47 AM
  #9998  
Mizchief's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

I figured out my steering binding issue. It was due to excessive toe out. I knew it was off but it didn't strike me as the issue until I got to the final setup stage of the build.

What happened was I built the links using the manual's measurements, however the RPM ball cups were shorter than stock so all my links were about 4mm short.

I found a good way to get my front end setup without fancy tools, I'm sure most already know, but thought I would share anyway

1. setup servo horn to be close to zero as possible and attach steering link
2. subtrim until the link is as close to centered as possible via eyeballing against the ridge of the top plate on the right hand side.
3. use a ruler to draw two parallel lines on a sheet of paper about 30mm apart
4. line up the front wheels (this is assuming the links are already set to same length) on the line furthest from you
5. Lay the camber tool flat on the paper on the other line using the desired angle against the wheel. So just like you would measuring camber but flat on the table to measure the toe. You could also use a protractor to draw and/or measure the angle but I find the included tool in the kit works great.

It's a lot cheaper than a fancy setup station and $50 setup board.
Mizchief is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 06:19 AM
  #9999  
Flip boy's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 109
From: Colorado
Default

[QUOTE=Grasschopper;12596573]
Originally Posted by Flip boy

Also check that your top shaft and make sure it is straight. There have been several reports of bent top shafts in this thread and the thread specifically about the kit. The way AVID ships the kits (padded bag via USPS) leaves some room for bending during shipping. If it's bent contact AVID, they have replaced them for others.
I didn't even consider that thankks will check guys, very hepful
Flip boy is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 08:11 AM
  #10000  
rc car guy's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Originally Posted by Mizchief
I figured out my steering binding issue. It was due to excessive toe out. I knew it was off but it didn't strike me as the issue until I got to the final setup stage of the build.

What happened was I built the links using the manual's measurements, however the RPM ball cups were shorter than stock so all my links were about 4mm short.

I found a good way to get my front end setup without fancy tools, I'm sure most already know, but thought I would share anyway

1. setup servo horn to be close to zero as possible and attach steering link
2. subtrim until the link is as close to centered as possible via eyeballing against the ridge of the top plate on the right hand side.
3. use a ruler to draw two parallel lines on a sheet of paper about 30mm apart
4. line up the front wheels (this is assuming the links are already set to same length) on the line furthest from you
5. Lay the camber tool flat on the paper on the other line using the desired angle against the wheel. So just like you would measuring camber but flat on the table to measure the toe. You could also use a protractor to draw and/or measure the angle but I find the included tool in the kit works great.

It's a lot cheaper than a fancy setup station and $50 setup board.
well im not entirely sure about the rest of you guys but i have a camber gauge and a ride height gauge, and a flat boar one of the guys at track got from work fiber glass on one side and like a particle board on the other side, i have a small level a 6 inch one that use to get it close to level when im out at the track,

also what do you guys think about aka's new evo sling shot wheels/tires i have a set preordered, i race blinky 17.5 indoor ozite(high bite) carpet, we are running ribs on front and suburbs rear, suburbs we get a month or so out of them depends practice (clay compound for both tires)

Last edited by rc car guy; 10-02-2013 at 08:46 AM.
rc car guy is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 08:29 AM
  #10001  
Mizchief's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

Originally Posted by rc car guy
well im not entirely sure about the rest of you guys but i have a camber gauge and a ride height gauge, and a flat boar one of the guys at track got from work fiber glass on one side and like a particle board on the other side, i have a small level a 6 inch one that use to get it close to level when im out at the track,

also what do you guys think about aka's new evo sling shot wheels/tires i have a set preordered, i race blinky 17.5 indoor ozite(high bite) carpet, we are running ribs on front and suburbs rear, suburbs we get a month or so out of them depends practice
I forgot to add that I use my digital calipers heavily to make sure the links are the same on both sides. I can get within 95% accuracy eyeballing with the simple tools, and I figure that is close enough for dirt as long as it's symmetric.
Mizchief is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 08:47 AM
  #10002  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

I just use the kits direction's for the Ti rod's proper measurements.

With a set of caliber's can get a perfect alinement every time ...
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 09:07 AM
  #10003  
Mizchief's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
I just use the kits direction's for the Ti rod's proper measurements.

With a set of caliber's can get a perfect alinement every time ...
That was my intention but the ball cups I used were different lengths. Besides that doesn't really help if you ever decide to tune your car and make an adjustment not spelled out by the manual.
Mizchief is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 09:18 AM
  #10004  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Mizchief
That was my intention but the ball cups I used were different lengths. Besides that doesn't really help if you ever decide to tune your car and make an adjustment not spelled out by the manual.
Does not matter which brand ball
cup you use , still the same measurements ....

If you do as I suggest ?

You will only have to use the steering sub trim to finish the alinement .

Try this , car will track like a arrow when done.
Both sides of the Ti rods will be equal & even .....
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 10-02-2013 | 09:26 AM
  #10005  
Mizchief's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Does not matter which brand ball
cup you use , still the same measurements ....

If you do as I suggest ?

You will only have to use the steering sub trim to finish the alinement .

Try this , car will track like a arrow when done.
Both sides of the Ti rods will be equal & even .....
As I said, the RPM cups have shorter shafts than the stock AE cups, the manual gives measurements based on how far apart the cups are apart, not the total length of the arm, and even then the RPM's are thicker which is what makes them hold on tighter during hard landings and hitting pipes.

I'm not sure, but the "long shank" RPM cups may be the same size, but I haven't compared those.
Mizchief is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.