Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B4.2 Thread >

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:42 AM
  #3586  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

Here's what's wrong with Durango.... look at the pro rear shock tower...... notice it's actually TWO shock towers. Stock bolted onto a Losi 4wd SCT tower because he keeps breaking the rears.

Sad part is the kid can drive and actually does very well but I think the car is holding him back.

BTW, they did this because they couldn't get any rear towers.... since then, they did get new ones but guess what... snapped it again on same spot.

Bob Barry is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:43 AM
  #3587  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

I heard that Maifield was thinking about the c4.1 for CC after the first day of practice. Obviously he never did this. maybe AE said no way, maybe it would be too much trying to setup a mid motor conversion that he has never ran. But he did seem to get the RM b4 working well enough for a 2nd place finish.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:43 AM
  #3588  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

oh and look at that sexy car behind his....
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:47 AM
  #3589  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

how many limiters are you running bob. you have a decent amount of droop
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:50 AM
  #3590  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
how many limiters are you running bob. you have a decent amount of droop
3 front 2 rear.
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 10:59 AM
  #3591  
t0p_sh0tta's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,863
From: Connecticut
Default

I liked my mid-motor Cougar, and always wanted to give an Xfactory ride a try.

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
lol, there is zero chance I will go mid motor on dirt
Speaking of which, I did try the high mounted ESC (I feel like a loser), and I liked it. I removed the 14g from the rear triangles, and it was great. Much crisper through the turns, and more rear bite. I ended up getting rid of the 1mm washers on the rear links, and ran them as low as possible.

As long as there aren't any huge jumps, the tapered AE 1.6 pistons, and K springs are golden. As traction comes up I do find myself wanting to go to a stiffer spring out back though. I keep pulling up the inside front tire coming out of turns. I'll see if I can find a set of take-offs from the RB6 guys.
t0p_sh0tta is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 11:04 AM
  #3592  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,616
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by t0p_sh0tta
Speaking of which, I did try the high mounted ESC (I feel like a loser), and I liked it. I removed the 14g from the rear triangles, and it was great. Much crisper through the turns, and more rear bite. I ended up getting rid of the 1mm washers on the rear links, and ran them as low as possible.
I made up a tray to mount the ESC but haven't tried it yet. I actually like the lower inline setup right now. Only reason I may try the shelf is so I can run a full size pack outside.

I think I'm going to leave it be for now to get a baseline with the low inline and then compare with the higher inline after.
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #3593  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by t0p_sh0tta
I liked my mid-motor Cougar, and always wanted to give an Xfactory ride a try.



Speaking of which, I did try the high mounted ESC (I feel like a loser), and I liked it. I removed the 14g from the rear triangles, and it was great. Much crisper through the turns, and more rear bite. I ended up getting rid of the 1mm washers on the rear links, and ran them as low as possible.

As long as there aren't any huge jumps, the tapered AE 1.6 pistons, and K springs are golden. As traction comes up I do find myself wanting to go to a stiffer spring out back though. I keep pulling up the inside front tire coming out of turns. I'll see if I can find a set of take-offs from the RB6 guys.
I still need to buy a rear t plate and make it into a shelf. I would use a used one, but I am not sure servo take would stick.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 03:13 PM
  #3594  
Suspended
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,104
From: Mother America
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Barry
Here's what's wrong with Durango.... look at the pro rear shock tower...... notice it's actually TWO shock towers. Stock bolted onto a Losi 4wd SCT tower because he keeps breaking the rears.

Sad part is the kid can drive and actually does very well but I think the car is holding him back.

BTW, they did this because they couldn't get any rear towers.... since then, they did get new ones but guess what... snapped it again on same spot.
That wing he is running looks dialed.

I don't recall Jörn Neumann having a problem breaking rear towers. Just saying.
ifuonlyknew is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 05:36 PM
  #3595  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Default

anyone will shimming tips for this car?
Philipmonday is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 05:40 PM
  #3596  
Jmuck69's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,061
From: Atlanta, GA.
Default

Originally Posted by Philipmonday
anyone will shimming tips for this car?
huh?
Jmuck69 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 05:48 PM
  #3597  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Philipmonday
anyone will shimming tips for this car?
we dont need no stinking shims. embrace the slop.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #3598  
onefast8's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,438
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
we dont need no stinking shims. embrace the slop.
Run it till it falls off imo.
onefast8 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 07:01 PM
  #3599  
EJF's Avatar
EJF
Tech Elite
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,053
From: Indiana
Default

The slop is my gripe with this car, a little doesnt bother me but, wow it does get very sloppy fast, and its slop that cant be shimmed. But the car does drive good
EJF is offline  
Old 04-01-2013 | 08:07 PM
  #3600  
Autocratic's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,691
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by ifuonlyknew
That wing he is running looks dialed.

I don't recall Jörn Neumann having a problem breaking rear towers. Just saying.
That's not even Jorn's car. Wing, body paint, and rear tires are all wrong. No TD team driver would ever do something like that with the rear tower.

I ran the 210 for roughly a year, and never broke the stock rear tower. Never broke a stock front either.

Bob, no idea where you got that picture, but it's probably not a real Durango team driver.

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
I still need to buy a rear t plate and make it into a shelf. I would use a used one, but I am not sure servo take would stick.
I made a rear shelf plate out of a spare carbon battery strap. Had to oval the holes slightly, but it worked. Never actually got to test it though because my ESC was too tall and the body wouldn't fit.
Autocratic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.