Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread >

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:36 AM
  #2416  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by UN4RACING
Where going to need pics. If its a heat issue like a bad bearing the plastic ones will fail even faster. I find the exacto knife to be a great pointer...LOL Take some calipers to each side. If you document with some facts they will for sure hook you up. You may have to check another kit?

Mine are with a new never used set..
Both are exactly 0.500,5 inches. The bearing will fall out if you tip them over. I would rather them be tighter but so far so good on previous kits. If you have a loose fit and a bad bearing it eats at the inner of the hub. Only fix I can think of is to put a piece of thin paper in there.

I personally would not trade in the option hubs, not going to happen. Avid sells bearings for a buck. I would try that before running plastic hubs. The bearings could be the issue. Put a caliper to them....

My hubs will be sailing toilet paper from them before I trade in my option hubs.
Did a version of the plastic bag trick and it locked the bearings in perfectly -- just snug enough. I don't want to get rid of those hubs either and you are right it could be the bearings. Thanks again for all of the help.
34x17 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:48 AM
  #2417  
rmtr's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 286
From: Cocoa,Fl.
Default Bottom spring cups ?

I believe the directions said to use the 5 mm,but they were not labeled. I have seen a couple of guys at my local track using the smaller ones. I assumed the largest was the 5 so that's what I have on. Which ones are you guys using? I believe there were three in the kit? Small , medium ,large ?
What will this change? Thanks in advance for any info!
rmtr is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:53 AM
  #2418  
fq06's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,646
From: Los Angeles
Default

Use the medium ones.
I broke one and had to use the large ones in front and I'm almost all the way out on the height adjustment. Ordered more and waiting.
fq06 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:54 AM
  #2419  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 574
From: Dallas, Tx.
Default

The middle one.
BillySnarf is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:55 AM
  #2420  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by rmtr
I believe the directions said to use the 5 mm,but they were not labeled. I have seen a couple of guys at my local track using the smaller ones. I assumed the largest was the 5 so that's what I have on. Which ones are you guys using? I believe there were three in the kit? Small , medium ,large ?
What will this change? Thanks in advance for any info!
You have to use the process of elimnation to find out which is the correct one. On page 25 part number 91310 12mm shock cups (+0mm, +5mm, +9mm) 4 ea. Since 5 is in between 0 and 9, the 5 mm cup is the middle sized ones.
thebomber is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 07:08 AM
  #2421  
BIGSKI15's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 570
From: Western PA
Default

The kit is built and I started installing electronics late last night. I plugged in a spare 200mm sensor wire which is way too long since I'm sort of a freak about neat wiring. What length do you all use?

Last edited by BIGSKI15; 01-21-2013 at 05:36 PM.
BIGSKI15 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 07:16 AM
  #2422  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 334
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BIGSKI15
The kit is build and I started installing electronics late last night. I plugged in a spare 200mm sensor wire which is way too long since I'm sort of a freak about neat wiring. What length do you all use?
150mm
Yzlvr is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 07:49 AM
  #2423  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Razathorn
That's not showing the center of gravity is at 24mm. When you raise the car up, the center of gravity goes up too, so that's a bit chicken/egg. I believe what you have encountered is you raised your ride height such that you raised your roll center above ground and now jacking force has reversed. What you have demonstrated was raising the front roll center above ground and its affect on jacking forces.

A more accurate jacking force demonstration of jacking force would be to press at the base of the tires near the contact patch.

Jacking forces are the upward or downward force placed against the chassis due to roll action and chassis geometry. If the roll center is above ground, the jacking forces will raise the chassis. If the roll center is below ground, the jacking forces will suck the car toward the ground.

The b44 platform places the roll center really low due to its nominal ride height, If you try this on a b4 rear, it will actually raise at 24mm ride height, but the center of gravity is well above 24mm on the b4.

Jacking forces are one of those things you rarely consider outside of the initial design of the car. Front roll centers are frequently found below ground and tend to suck the front down and add steering on hard corners. Rear roll centers are frequently found slightly above ground, allowing making the rear suck down on hard corner exit when weight transfer lowers the rear and reverses the jacking forces, while still allowing the rear to unload easily in corner entry. The relative GENERAL location of roll centers are part of the car's design. The final fine tuning position achieved with camber link positions and ball stud washers is just playing in that area.

This is yet another reason one does not vary ride height much from the factory settings -- it jacks up the jacking forces and general location the roll centers should be for the car to behave right in all situations.

Wayne
Newbie here and very interested in this conversation. Am I close to understanding if I believe the following to be true?

Center of Mass (COM) is the point where you would have to hold the car to have it balance on a single point. By adjusting the ride height, you are not changing the COM only it's position relative to the ground. The higher the ride height the greater the distance between the COM and the contact patch with the gound. This creates a longer moment arm (leverage) increasing the rotational and/or sliding force. Makes it top heavy if you will.

The roll center is point at which the chassis rolls about. For the sake of arguement it's the physical center of a ball. If you push the ball at it's physical center it will not roll but move linearly away from the force (neglecting friction). If I push the ball above the center, it will roll away from me. If I push the ball below the center, it will roll towards me.

Does that make sense or can you clarify?
thebomber is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 08:31 AM
  #2424  
Razathorn's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,269
Default

Originally Posted by UN4RACING
I never change my ball stud shim setting from the stock set up. RAZ will vouch for that. I don't go there. I would have to be desprit. You can't pay me to change it.
Which drives me mad to no end. You'll change camber link length, but not ball stud washers?! Changing length changes the same thing as washers, just more extreme and also changes camber rise more.

It's kinda like if you were afraid of 10' ladders, but had no problem base jumping off of buildings with a chute. The mind boggles.

Wayne
Razathorn is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 08:39 AM
  #2425  
Razathorn's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,269
Default

Originally Posted by thebomber
Newbie here and very interested in this conversation. Am I close to understanding if I believe the following to be true?

Center of Mass (COM) is the point where you would have to hold the car to have it balance on a single point. By adjusting the ride height, you are not changing the COM only it's position relative to the ground. The higher the ride height the greater the distance between the COM and the contact patch with the gound. This creates a longer moment arm (leverage) increasing the rotational and/or sliding force. Makes it top heavy if you will.
The center of mass/gravity at each end is what is important for roll center and connecting moment arm.

The roll center is point at which the chassis rolls about. For the sake of arguement it's the physical center of a ball. If you push the ball at it's physical center it will not roll but move linearly away from the force (neglecting friction). If I push the ball above the center, it will roll away from me. If I push the ball below the center, it will roll towards me.

Does that make sense or can you clarify?
Well, the ball is a bad example. The "roll center" of a ball is where it contacts the ground. The "roll center" of any simple object is where it contacts the ground. It's not in the center of mass.

What we were talking about was jacking forces, which you honestly don't need to even think about outside of designing a new car or making radical changes, to which I assume you are not planning.

In regard to the roll center and its relation to the center of mass at a given end, simply think of the roll center as a virtual point that does not exist but is effectively where hand is at, holding a broom with a big head. The broom stick is the moment arm. Longer the broom stick, the harder it is for you to keep that broom head from swaying back and forth (more roll). The shorter, the easier to control (less roll). The lower the roll center, the lower your hand, since the center of mass (broom head) does not change. So, a lower roll center makes the moment arm (broom stick exposed) longer, and thus it more readily sways (roll).

Hope that helps.
Razathorn is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 09:00 AM
  #2426  
fq06's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,646
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Razathorn
Which drives me mad to no end. You'll change camber link length, but not ball stud washers?! Changing length changes the same thing as washers, just more extreme and also changes camber rise more.

It's kinda like if you were afraid of 10' ladders, but had no problem base jumping off of buildings with a chute. The mind boggles.

Wayne
100%
Length is a big adjustment and ball height is a small adjustment.

Then you get into camber rise... that's a whole other can of worms
fq06 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 09:50 AM
  #2427  
prdmetalworks's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 209
From: Fulton, NY
Default

Originally Posted by UN4RACING
Yeah right. You where just trying to get me down to the wic first.
That steering lock up sucks. Are you running toe out? Try zero and see if that stops the lock up. If not I have a cure and I can be done with testing it. I think the 2nd fix is zero toe in the front.? All the guys I have talked to that have not had trouble have positive front toe...LOL Walking the pits is scarey sometimes. I have yet to try the zero. I have to rework my set up to get the studs back to box stock to try it and be sure. I did put a vid up I think of what I tried. I will see if I can find it.
More steering, if you like the ballast all I see is trying 22mm rear and 21mm from or even 22/22 21/21. Or even tighten the rear diff to the same as the front. i have to ask though. What are you running on for dirt?
Clay. Pretty tacky during the first round of qualifying, to drying / medium bite for the 2nd round. They water before the mains but run 4x4 SC & buggy last, so it's usually back to 2nd round conditions after 15 or 16 eight minute mains.
prdmetalworks is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 10:16 AM
  #2428  
Razathorn's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,269
Default

For the steering lock-up, even with toe-out, I don't have it when the caster blocks and spindles are new. When they get worn significantly, then yes. I tend to replace those at the first sign of locking up, but if you're having problems when new, a trick I used to layer CA glue up on the caster block where the spindle stop is. I would put some glue down, heat gun it a bit, more glue, heat gun.. etc, until it was too high, then use a small hand file and file it back down to the ideal stop size that caused it to not bind.
Razathorn is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 10:35 AM
  #2429  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Razathorn
The center of mass/gravity at each end is what is important for roll center and connecting moment arm.



Well, the ball is a bad example. The "roll center" of a ball is where it contacts the ground. The "roll center" of any simple object is where it contacts the ground. It's not in the center of mass.

What we were talking about was jacking forces, which you honestly don't need to even think about outside of designing a new car or making radical changes, to which I assume you are not planning.

In regard to the roll center and its relation to the center of mass at a given end, simply think of the roll center as a virtual point that does not exist but is effectively where hand is at, holding a broom with a big head. The broom stick is the moment arm. Longer the broom stick, the harder it is for you to keep that broom head from swaying back and forth (more roll). The shorter, the easier to control (less roll). The lower the roll center, the lower your hand, since the center of mass (broom head) does not change. So, a lower roll center makes the moment arm (broom stick exposed) longer, and thus it more readily sways (roll).

Hope that helps.
It helps a ton, but I'm not completely there yet. Since these chassis' are pretty inflexible wouldn't what's happening on one end influence the other end? Or is it that they actually flex more than I think?

I just looked up roll center on Wiki and that with what you said is helping a ton. The roll center is the highest point at which a lateral force can be applied to the sprung weight of the car without inducing roll. The distance between the roll center and the COM is in effect a moment arm. The longer the moment arm the more the roll.

Please don't take this as doubt in what you're saying as I'm really interested and trying to gain better insight.

Last edited by thebomber; 01-21-2013 at 10:51 AM.
thebomber is offline  
Old 01-21-2013 | 10:36 AM
  #2430  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Razathorn
For the steering lock-up, even with toe-out, I don't have it when the caster blocks and spindles are new. When they get worn significantly, then yes. I tend to replace those at the first sign of locking up, but if you're having problems when new, a trick I used to layer CA glue up on the caster block where the spindle stop is. I would put some glue down, heat gun it a bit, more glue, heat gun.. etc, until it was too high, then use a small hand file and file it back down to the ideal stop size that caused it to not bind.
great idea, especially the over build up since it's easier to file to size.
thebomber is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.