Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread >

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The AE FActory Team B44.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2012 | 10:43 PM
  #811  
skengines's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (227)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,402
From: SoCal
Default

is the undertray film precut to size?

Last edited by skengines; 11-21-2012 at 10:58 PM.
skengines is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 12:48 AM
  #812  
rigor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,610
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by skengines
is the undertray film precut to size?
No. That would be a disaster trying to be certain you got it on perfectly at the start and ended up precise on all corners / turns by the end. The glue/adhesive on the film is crazy strong; you wouldn't get it off w/o damaging it. Simply apply and then take a blade to the edges along the chassis and you're done. It's quite easy that way to be honest.
rigor is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 12:51 AM
  #813  
rigor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,610
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JEDI BASS
You should consider an SX3 also. I've done side-by-side comparisons lately against the B44 my daughter used to drive (a buddy owns it now) and the 44 is harder to drive by far. BUT, the 44.2 looks like a much improved upon version that should be easier to control... like my SX3.

Anyways.... carry on .
What is an SX3 ? You make it sound like it's such a common model that everyone here would know what it is. I'm no RC car geek, but I've at least heard of all the major models of cars & trucks around my local indoor clay tracks, and I can't even tell you who makes this SX3.

EDIT: Ok I now see Schumacher in your signature area. Glad to hear you like it. I don't think either of my regular tracks (West Coast Raceway and OC_RC) even sell Schumacher stuff, and the hobby shops at these facilities are stacked.

Last edited by rigor; 11-22-2012 at 01:20 AM.
rigor is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 01:21 AM
  #814  
rcfiend's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,815
From: Irvine, CA.
Default

How far do you guys off set the servo horn? I'm having a problem getting my left & right end points set equally.
rcfiend is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 03:42 AM
  #815  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by rigor

Regarding your Tekin motor mounting, since the chassis plate heights hasn't changed, you'll probably find the answer in the B44.1 thread. You can use any 2 opposite holes on your motor for mounting, but like you said, it's all about the angle of those circuit board tabs coming off your motor and fitting. I wouldn't say it's so much about being below the top chassis plate (despite what AE states) but more about it fitting in there between the body. I've snapped a quick phone pic to give you an idea of how much clear area there is around the motor tabs / body on my build. This is the included Jconcepts body. I also have a ProLine Bulldog body that I could check out to see if there is more clearance room (or not).

Get some rest, search the B44.1 thread for "Tekin", and work on the motor install tomorrow. It can't be coincidence that most build / maintenance mistakes I've made on RC cars is late at night when I've been going at it for a while, or just flat out mentally tired.
I honestly thought they were saying that you need to mount the motor such that the solder tabs weren't hitting the top deck.

thebomber is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 06:19 AM
  #816  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 399
Default

You should consider an SX3 also. I've done side-by-side comparisons lately against the B44 my daughter used to drive (a buddy owns it now) and the 44 is harder to drive by far. BUT, the 44.2 looks like a much improved upon version that should be easier to control... like my SX3.
Yes, I was also looking at the Cat, forgot to mention... people have great things to say about this car also. From the reading I have been doing it really sounds lke the B44.2 is a much improved car over the B44. How durable is the B44.2 compared to the 410 and the SX3? I don't really crash that much, but, we have alot of out of control SC trucks at my track..they will randomly come flying at you no matter where your at(kids).
AJrollin is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 06:38 AM
  #817  
thebomber's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 256
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by AJrollin
Yes, I was also looking at the Cat, forgot to mention... people have great things to say about this car also. From the reading I have been doing it really sounds lke the B44.2 is a much improved car over the B44. How durable is the B44.2 compared to the 410 and the SX3? I don't really crash that much, but, we have alot of out of control SC trucks at my track..they will randomly come flying at you no matter where your at(kids).
So far I've found it not to be that durable. I agree with you about SCTs acting like it's a demolition Derby. In two outings I have had the following breakages:

Day one broken Rod End as the result of nothing special. It split along the seam. My day was saved because the track had RPM's in stock.

Day 2 - Ball end broke off inside the caster block after what I would call an ordinary jump. I resorted to using block B only to have the front left "A" arm break in half. This was a pretty hard hit though.

Take away for me was to stock up on spares.
thebomber is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 07:00 AM
  #818  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 399
Default

So far I've found it not to be that durable. I agree with you about SCTs acting like it's a demolition Derby. In two outings I have had the following breakages:

Day one broken Rod End as the result of nothing special. It split along the seam. My day was saved because the track had RPM's in stock.

Day 2 - Ball end broke off inside the caster block after what I would call an ordinary jump. I resorted to using block B only to have the front left "A" arm break in half. This was a pretty hard hit though.

Take away for me was to stock up on spares.
Hmmm, durability will be something I need as my local hobby shop really has nothing for 4wd at all
AJrollin is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 07:26 AM
  #819  
UN4RACING's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,140
From: MODIFIED!
Default

Originally Posted by thebomber
So far I've found it not to be that durable. I agree with you about SCTs acting like it's a demolition Derby. In two outings I have had the following breakages:

Day one broken Rod End as the result of nothing special. It split along the seam. My day was saved because the track had RPM's in stock.

Day 2 - Ball end broke off inside the caster block after what I would call an ordinary jump. I resorted to using block B only to have the front left "A" arm break in half. This was a pretty hard hit though.

Take away for me was to stock up on spares.
I used to be sold on AE ball cups. Not any more, the last 2 kits the ball cups have been total failures. 2 in one day one kept popping off and the other split same as yours. I have since been using the JConcepts they are nice. I will get some pics up. There cool looking and pretty tough so far.
UN4RACING is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 07:34 AM
  #820  
hobdog's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,041
From: Albany, OR.
Default

Originally Posted by thebomber
So far I've found it not to be that durable. I agree with you about SCTs acting like it's a demolition Derby. In two outings I have had the following breakages:

Day one broken Rod End as the result of nothing special. It split along the seam. My day was saved because the track had RPM's in stock.

Day 2 - Ball end broke off inside the caster block after what I would call an ordinary jump. I resorted to using block B only to have the front left "A" arm break in half. This was a pretty hard hit though.

Take away for me was to stock up on spares.
On the other side of the coin, I have had great luck with the cars durability. I have put about four race days and a couple of practice days and have yet to break anything or have any real issues. With that being said, I have kept a very close eye on things and I ditched the stock ball cups and turnbuckles before I even started running the car to Lunsfords (the stock ballcups are not the best IMO). I came from a durnago 410 which I also had great luck with.
hobdog is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 08:03 AM
  #821  
dMITIj's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 336
From: Denmark
Default

Originally Posted by AJrollin
1. Yes, I was also looking at the Cat, forgot to mention... people have great things to say about this car also. From the reading I have been doing it really sounds lke the B44.2 is a much improved car over the B44. How durable is the B44.2 compared to the 410 and the SX3? I don't really crash that much, but, we have alot of out of control SC trucks at my track..they will randomly come flying at you no matter where your at(kids).
Originally Posted by hobdog
2. On the other side of the coin, I have had great luck with the cars durability. I have put about four race days and a couple of practice days and have yet to break anything or have any real issues. With that being said, I have kept a very close eye on things and I ditched the stock ball cups and turnbuckles before I even started running the car to Lunsfords (the stock ballcups are not the best IMO). I came from a durnago 410 which I also had great luck with.
1. I dont think that the CAT is that well knowen in the US it more of an english car, i haven't seen that many when im looking at the US-shops so mabey there could be some part's that could be hard to get.

2. So what do you thing B44.2 vs Durango DEX410? (v3?) i was looking at the DEX410v3 because of the gear diff but didt end up buying the B44.2.

but im still not sure if i would have bin better of with the TD410v3 (because i know the gear diff and the work with it and the Durango is easyer to get here in Denmark than the AE that's what make me second guessing)

Best Regards.
dMITIj is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 08:40 AM
  #822  
rcfiend's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,815
From: Irvine, CA.
Default

Originally Posted by rcfiend
How far do you guys off set the servo horn? I'm having a problem getting my left & right end points set equally.
Anybody???
rcfiend is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 09:31 AM
  #823  
rigor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,610
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by rcfiend
How far do you guys off set the servo horn? I'm having a problem getting my left & right end points set equally.
Page 19 states to offset the servo horn by about 5-10 degrees, and page 20 shows the servo link to be about 20.5mm. I used a digital caliper to ballpark set all my links throughout the car initially. However, I did find I needed to remove my servo horn and pop it over 1 more setting on the servo gear teeth (probably ended up more in the range of 10-20 degrees), as well as slightly adjust the servo link so the steering rack was centered perfectly. From there it was very minor adjustments on my radio system.
rigor is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 09:37 AM
  #824  
07Forester's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,534
From: Yorkville, IL
Default

So, Last night I went to leisure last night and found a pretty upsetting problem. My car has an extremely hard on power push, on one of the highest traction tracks in the midwest. Not to mention the car feels like it doesn't want to steer....AT ALL

I built the car to kit specs, with the only deviation being to run the black sway bar. I keep bleeding the shocks..and nothing is helping. Anyone have any ideas?

I will say almost EVERYONE is running ghost pins, and a team driver I talked to pretty much said a lot of my problem was the tires. However, I get a little of the same problem at my "home" track.
07Forester is offline  
Old 11-22-2012 | 09:39 AM
  #825  
rigor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,610
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by AJrollin
Hmmm, durability will be something I need as my local hobby shop really has nothing for 4wd at all
I wouldn't count on this being your only vehicle you'll want to take to the track with you then. I'd consider myself a totally decent driver, and I've had minor breakage (front A-arms, front links, etc) due to folks not calling out they are stalled on the track (come off a jump and land right into them on the downside) as well as the casual SCT bashing / hacking crappy drivers. The car is strong, but also fragile at the same time. After having a 44.1 for some time, that's the best way I can describe it. I am now selective of how many drivers and car types of when I'll put my 44 down on the track. I drive my B4.1 far more frequently, cause it's far more durable in the event of contact from other vehicles. But dang is 4WD buggy so awesome
rigor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.