Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno RC EB48 Thread >

Tekno RC EB48 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

Tekno RC EB48 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2012 | 07:43 AM
  #856  
mrnizzles's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 196
From: CA
Default

I wasn't trying to compare performance, honestly, I think all the major e-buggys out there are good enuff to run at the track and be competitive.

with 2s packs, I can share them with 1/10 scale... (not sure why this is 'bad' to do .. never heard of that.. ) where as a single pack you can't. so that's the cost savings I was thinking of, not so much the cost of a single pack comparison, but the total amount you would need to race at the track. Currently I have 6 2s packs, and I have run them in my friends 1/10 scale cars no prob.

I never really considered that people 'forgetting' about charging their packs... most people seem pretty good about monitoring their chargers in case of a fire.

and Hobby King has locations in the USA to ship from, so shipping can be pretty fast.... people buy Hobby Wing esc's from China, like everything else we buy... Anyway, Im a regular at Amainhobbies.com, and I buy Tekin, which is USA made..

no, i didn't race NiMH batteries, I've been doing nitro for many years, and the Serpent was my first way BACK into electric... I always thought the older battery tech was too pricey for what u got, compared to nitro... in my opinion, for what I wanted from RC.

dont mean to rough too many feathers, I mean the car isnt even out yet.. what if it flops like the Facebook stock!! (j/k I dont think it will) Oh, Im sure I will see one at the track soon, and get to listen to someone bash me simply because they beat me... lol

_

Last edited by mrnizzles; 07-14-2012 at 07:54 AM.
mrnizzles is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 08:03 AM
  #857  
Oldanski311's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 145
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by mrnizzles
I wasn't trying to compare performance, honestly, I think all the major e-buggys out there are good enuff to run at the track and be competitive.

with 2s packs, I can share them with 1/10 scale... (not sure why this is 'bad' to do .. never heard of that.. ) where as a single pack you can't. so that's the cost savings I was thinking of, not so much the cost of a single pack comparison, but the total amount you would need to race at the track. Currently I have 6 2s packs, and I have run them in my friends 1/10 scale cars no prob.

I never really considered that people 'forgetting' about charging their packs... most people seem pretty good about monitoring their chargers in case of a fire.

and Hobby King has locations in the USA to ship from, so shipping can be pretty fast.... people buy Hobby Wing esc's from China, like everything else we buy... Anyway, Im a regular at Amainhobbies.com, and I buy Tekin, which is USA made..

no, i didn't race NiMH batteries, I've been doing nitro for many years, and the Serpent was my first way BACK into electric... I always thought the older battery tech was too pricey for what u got, compared to nitro... in my opinion, for what I wanted from RC.

dont mean to rough too many feathers, I mean the car isnt even out yet.. what if it flops like the Facebook stock!! (j/k I dont think it will) Oh, Im sure I will see one at the track soon, and get to listen to someone bash me simply because they beat me... lol

_
...

Last edited by Oldanski311; 07-23-2012 at 12:18 AM.
Oldanski311 is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 08:19 AM
  #858  
ChrisAttebery's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (121)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,258
From: Gilroy, CA
Default

There are two components here, balance and how tightly you can package all the components. They may be balanced (in two of three axis) two pack buggies, but there's no way they will be packaged as tightly.


Originally Posted by larlev
Very respectful post...kudos for that.

I know we have done our own scale test and I would just say the numbers in the article don't reflect our findings. The Caster for example has great balance due to the fact that all the electronics are tucked in close as possible to centerline of the buggy. Is it perfect....no
It's mentioned that with the "EB48 it is possible to balance perfectly with right choice in motor and battery". That maybe true, but what if our motor and battery choice doesn't add up correctly? Do we change systems/lipos for sake of being perfect? The 6.25-8.4oz mentioned is not what we find doing our test.

Like you said though, it's not a "head to head" battle for obvious reasons and I agree with you on that. My only point to this post is not every "dual pack" car is created equal. There are better balanced dual pack cars just like there are better balanced single pack cars.

The EB48 looks to be a great single pack buggy. You guys do put out some great products.

They are all capable of winning and all deserve a look.....
ChrisAttebery is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 10:04 AM
  #859  
larlev's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
From: Austin, Tx.
Default

It's really a mute point anyway. For all of us Local joe club racers we can't tell the difference anyway. Folks think they can, but reality is they can't.

Maybe in the hands of a pro level driver.

I just find some of the statements regarding dual packs design to be a stretch. Most of the statements are from guys that have never raced with one. There is no way to determine what is truly better. We all think what we own is the best...as it should be.

Enjoy the new buggy. I'm sure it will perform nicely
larlev is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 01:21 PM
  #860  
teknorc's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,160
From: So Cal
Default

Whoa, missed a day, lots of stuff here.

I'm happy to see the different opinions being presented here in a respectful manner. So many threads degenerate into childish rants and I think there is a lot of good info here for everyone to digest. There are a lot of options in this class right now with more to come for sure.

Hopefully the discussion will continue in a few weeks at the ROAR nats and the 1/8th 'Worlds' at the Tiltyard. We're looking forward to meeting the other teams and exchanging ideas to keep the class growing.
teknorc is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 02:28 PM
  #861  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 171
From: J-Town, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by mrnizzles
with 2s packs, I can share them with 1/10 scale... (not sure why this is 'bad' to do .. never heard of that..
It can be bad for the same reason it might be bad to charge a 2s pack without balancing. One cell may drop too low before lvc kicks in. In addition you can run into problems by using two packs that have been cycled differently. In other words, say you have used pack A 30 times, and pack B 10 times. Now when wired together as a 4s pack, they will discharge at different rates which can lead to problems. As mentioned earlier, guys who run 2x2s setups generally will keep the packs paired with each other to avoid issues and get the best performance.
rcmonkey is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 03:30 PM
  #862  
Jpm1's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,395
Default

Are new tower preorders still covered or would it be in the second batch?
Jpm1 is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 04:07 PM
  #863  
teknorc's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,160
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Jpm1
Are new tower preorders still covered or would it be in the second batch?
Everything is still covered in the first batch. We'll let you know when we're close to selling out of the first batch. Thanks.
teknorc is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 04:16 PM
  #864  
wstuart's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (119)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,085
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by larlev
It's really a mute point anyway. For all of us Local joe club racers we can't tell the difference anyway. Folks think they can, but reality is they can't.

Maybe in the hands of a pro level driver.

I just find some of the statements regarding dual packs design to be a stretch. Most of the statements are from guys that have never raced with one. There is no way to determine what is truly better. We all think what we own is the best...as it should be.

Enjoy the new buggy. I'm sure it will perform nicely

Ive driven losi AE mugen electric conversions. Each with and without the OEM conversion and a tekno conversion. My buddy also let me drive his a serpent side by side pack layout.

A couple months ago Danny at Tekno let me drive the eb48 prototype. There is ABSOLUTELY a difference. The EB48 was the BEST thing I have ever driven on dirt. This may sound weird but it felt lighter and smaller that any other buggy I've driven. The direction changes are instantaneous and easily controllable and the corner speed was touring car like. Personally I have not enjoyed running eighth scale indoors. This car changed my mind. It wasn't until I drove Danny's car that I realized how much I was fighting the other cars.

This is coming from an Average Joe racer too.
wstuart is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 04:45 PM
  #865  
protc3's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,867
From: Spring Hill,Florida
Default

I will try this car out. I have a serpent but i also have an open mind. The EB48 is layed out nice and i think it will perform really well. My Serpent runs extremely well too. It jumps like a dream and steers like an animal. It has a very balanced feel on the track and corrects very well in the air.

Realistically though, Is this car durable? How does the driveline hold up? Im not being sarcastic, im asking as i really want to know as some cars burn them up pretty quick. I like hassle free cars and durable cars. They must handle great too. Im not asking for too much now am i?

This is why i went with the Serpent, As of now, i havent seen anything that can stand up to it. Maybe this car can. I would like to see. Only way to find out is to get one.
protc3 is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 05:21 PM
  #866  
Rob Phillips's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,747
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by teknorc
Signed up a long time ago. We should be there.
You guys will have a great time! Hope to see you guys pull it off and take home the win.
Rob Phillips is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 07:48 PM
  #867  
McD44's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 785
From: Kalamazoo
Default

Originally Posted by protc3
I will try this car out. I have a serpent but i also have an open mind. The EB48 is layed out nice and i think it will perform really well. My Serpent runs extremely well too. It jumps like a dream and steers like an animal. It has a very balanced feel on the track and corrects very well in the air.

Realistically though, Is this car durable? How does the driveline hold up? Im not being sarcastic, im asking as i really want to know as some cars burn them up pretty quick. I like hassle free cars and durable cars. They must handle great too. Im not asking for too much now am i?

This is why i went with the Serpent, As of now, i havent seen anything that can stand up to it. Maybe this car can. I would like to see. Only way to find out is to get one.
If the driveline is anything like the Tekno driveline that I put in my SCTE it will prove to be extremely durable. Extremely high quality parts.

I will also be buying an EB48 but not right away. I just picked up a DNX408 conversion and I'm going to run it like crazy for a little while before picking up a second batch EB48.
McD44 is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 08:05 PM
  #868  
Davidka's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,890
From: Midwest
Default

Originally Posted by mrnizzles
Teknorc...

u guys shoulda compared vs. the Serpent e-buggy... it is currently the best e-buggy (considering quality, fit n finish, performance, etc) available at this time

tho the diagonal numbers might be a larger difference, everyone in the Serpent e-buggy thread (also not NASA scientists ... ) has stated over and over, from real track experience, that the car is "very" planted and difficult to unsettle on the track. And no one, I mean no one, has broken anything on the damn car!!!


call it a hunch, nothing scientific, but I really don't think that the other manf, that u listed in a previous post, would be able to come up with numbers to make a case remotely close to the Serpent... and yeah, I would challenge those to do so. Competition breads better results, not more hatred.


_
I believe a few pages ago Tekno did exactly what you suggest, measuring the balance of the Serpent. It made the case for the balance advantages of the EB48.

They make a nice kit for sure but the last time I saw one running, it was being driven by a guy who was close to me in pace (3rd Q in the mixed nitro/E-buggy A-main) but he broke every run, until something broke that he couldn't replace. Part availability is tough with these too. Not to knock the design, one of the fastest nitro guys in my region runs them and his cars are soooo good. He rarely breaks.

I've had a great time with my V4 MBX6. Most of the advantages and easy part availability/cost (though it rarely breaks).
Davidka is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 08:12 PM
  #869  
SEF's Avatar
SEF
Tech Elite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,151
From: LA
Default

For the guys testing out there, how do you like running mechanical brakes in this buggy? Are there tracks were you like mechanical brakes over motor brakes? Will the mechanical brake setup be available with release of this buggy?

One of the reasons for staying away from mechanical brakes is the added weight. But with this buggy being lighter, it looks like we can still get a pretty well balanced buggy even with an extra servo in the rear.

Thanks! Can't wait to get this car on the track
SEF is offline  
Old 07-14-2012 | 08:28 PM
  #870  
teknorc's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,160
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by SEF
For the guys testing out there, how do you like running mechanical brakes in this buggy? Are there tracks were you like mechanical brakes over motor brakes? Will the mechanical brake setup be available with release of this buggy?

One of the reasons for staying away from mechanical brakes is the added weight. But with this buggy being lighter, it looks like we can still get a pretty well balanced buggy even with an extra servo in the rear.

Thanks! Can't wait to get this car on the track
We have a guy running mech brakes now (indoor even). I'll have him post up his experience with them. He's running a Neu 1509/2Y (1850kv) and ProTek 4s/4100 hardcase. I think his buggy is ~3395g (just under 7.5lb) with the brakes.
teknorc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.