Angelo bring up the flag. :)

it's been Confirmed!:smile:

Irgo brother i dont know anything about the V3:sneaky::sneaky::sneaky: but as for a bug in the software there is no bug michael never included the delay for his own reason which i haven't been told .

Ok Irgo just for you it's a bug actually a mosquito lol

ha,..ha,..:smile:
you are funny.. guy :)
Thank's Angelo.

what function or parameter should i change for get infield power ?

Depends on what you are running and what your setup is.

I have been gearing up, and having my boost start at higher rpms to keep the timing lower, at low rpms making more torque.


You should post your setup, and give us some more information, and people here can make some opions.

o.k .. setup here .. 10.5t motor esc HW 120A 2.1
Track size 120Feet
FDR 7.2

Drrs - 9
boost timing 40
Turbo timing 26 (default)
Delay 0.1s
Slope 6/0.1s
boost acc 350

how my setup ?.. infield feeling lack punch

Mine's

Drrs - 7
boost timing 30
Turbo timing 30 (default)
Delay 0.1s
Slope 18/0.1s
boost acc 300

FDR 7.0~7.3

Depends on your motor too..Whatever it is, I don't listen to hype(s) regarding to what motor is best.

ok Guys

Yes there is a V3 esc which is in design phase and expected time of release will be Sep maybe later 2011.

All i can say is i do have photos of the unit but cannot post .

features will be

New method of programming so we dont violate patents .
We will delete the external switch and have the switch built into the esc .
The led's will be on the top surface area of the esc near the switch so you can see the errors when they occur .
Smaller footprint
Positive and Negative wiring will be together so you dont get tangle with the motor phases and more...

The programming method i cannot reveal as we will have others trying to place patents especially in the USA to keep us out of the US .until we have completed our patent paperwork we will not reveal the method of programming for protection reasons but i can tell you there will be two methods and both will hold patents.we will lock the technology nice and tight to punish the ones who try and punish us for the future .what do they say two can play the same game lol.

Ill keep you all informed with the progress.

Hello smilekt, you forgot one crucial parameter here and that's your boost start rpm. And your turbo delay is too short for my liking (however a gentle slope), try .3 or above and see how it feels. You have all the useable timing in your set up, which might be too much for a 10.5. Higher/more aggressive settings doesn't always make a faster car. Like Shawn says and many others, too much timing too early just bogs the motor down and creates unnecessary heat.

opps sorry ... start at 3000 rpm

Angelo .. Thanks ..

so V3 more power ?

Try 6000 and don't be afraid to go higher after testing. Yesterday I changed from 5000 to 7000rpm boost start with my 13.5 and had more punch and better top end because it has torque when it needs it and a higher rpm when the boost timing ends. Then your turbo should take over around that point, or thats how I try to work it anyway!:cool: Was pleased with the results.

Thank toby333 .. will try it .. :nod:

thanks cheapskate.brok.. :nod:

No man is an island
 

I found the same thing - I am beginning to figure out 224 firware - and that seems to be a lot better than 518 in this regard.

It's nice to know that I am kind of going the right way so to speak - as I have now decided to increase the boost rpm as well.

GEtting rid of drag brake has helped the car as well.