NEW HOBBYWING STOCK SUPERCHARGED SOFTWARE
#3931
Tech Adept
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 145
From: southampton, UK

eg, 64 boost, but you only using 30 when the turbo requirements are met....
does it ignore the turbo (which will add timing quicker than boost), or does it then add the turbo until it hits 64, then any excess boost and turbo is left out?
worth thinking about
#3932
#3934
This weekend I attended the first race GMV 2011 in Tuscany, Italy, I won the race by taking the TQ and also made the best lap.
For those interested this is my setup:
The track is very technical and small, only 17.5 Superstock category
ESC - Xtreme
Engine - Xerun 17.5
FW - 211
FDR - 6,3
4 - 9
9 - 50°
10 - 18/0,1s
12 - 20°
13 - 3000rpm
14 - 0,1s
15 - 250rpm/Deg
For those interested this is my setup:
The track is very technical and small, only 17.5 Superstock category
ESC - Xtreme
Engine - Xerun 17.5
FW - 211
FDR - 6,3
4 - 9
9 - 50°
10 - 18/0,1s
12 - 20°
13 - 3000rpm
14 - 0,1s
15 - 250rpm/Deg
#3936
but what happens if you meet the turbo requirements before all 64 degrees of boost are added 
eg, 64 boost, but you only using 30 when the turbo requirements are met....
does it ignore the turbo (which will add timing quicker than boost), or does it then add the turbo until it hits 64, then any excess boost and turbo is left out?
worth thinking about

eg, 64 boost, but you only using 30 when the turbo requirements are met....
does it ignore the turbo (which will add timing quicker than boost), or does it then add the turbo until it hits 64, then any excess boost and turbo is left out?
worth thinking about

This side I understand just wasn't sure on the total amount.
Could be wrong though.
You missed a crack yesterday mate. Hope the hangover was worth it
#3937
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 72
it seem that the Cutoff (no matter you are using The Stock Firmware)
is Designed for Mod/High Load for safety reason.
but this had negative effect when using Stock/Low Load.
we found setting cutoff custom 6.7v = "lipo end3.3v/cell(Mod)" = "lipo end3.15v/cell(Stock)".
depend on Cutoff performance, this also had bad effect when Lipo already
reach near the Cutoff and Kicked with Turbo.
is Designed for Mod/High Load for safety reason.
but this had negative effect when using Stock/Low Load.
we found setting cutoff custom 6.7v = "lipo end3.3v/cell(Mod)" = "lipo end3.15v/cell(Stock)".
depend on Cutoff performance, this also had bad effect when Lipo already
reach near the Cutoff and Kicked with Turbo.
My understanding of this is that
High load(Mod) = larger voltage drop, meaning it cuts off earlier.
Low load(Stock) = Less voltage drop, less difference between load and no load measurement.
So basically, if you set your cut-off voltage the same for stock and mod, and run both cars to the cut off, then measure both batteries, the mod battery will have a higher voltage, because they both hit the cut off voltage under different loads. When the load is gone, you get the true voltage
If this makes sense:
Mod: Cutoff voltage = V Battery(no load) - V drop (bigger V drop=Higher Battery voltage)
Stock: Cutoff Voltage = V Battery(no load) - V drop (smaller V drop=Lower Battery voltage)
So, be careful about cut-off voltage in stock classes according to irgo's findings? (use a higher setting)
I hope I've got that right
High load(Mod) = larger voltage drop, meaning it cuts off earlier.
Low load(Stock) = Less voltage drop, less difference between load and no load measurement.
So basically, if you set your cut-off voltage the same for stock and mod, and run both cars to the cut off, then measure both batteries, the mod battery will have a higher voltage, because they both hit the cut off voltage under different loads. When the load is gone, you get the true voltage
If this makes sense:
Mod: Cutoff voltage = V Battery(no load) - V drop (bigger V drop=Higher Battery voltage)
Stock: Cutoff Voltage = V Battery(no load) - V drop (smaller V drop=Lower Battery voltage)
So, be careful about cut-off voltage in stock classes according to irgo's findings? (use a higher setting)
I hope I've got that right
so.. i will need to raise the Cut-off voltage for Stock.
#3940
#3942
I say 120a. Much tougher.
I have recently switched from Xtreme's to 120's so i can switch between mod and stock racing.
With the 120a and 17.5 with boost i dont need a fan which means that it weighs the same as an xtreme with a fan....
I have recently switched from Xtreme's to 120's so i can switch between mod and stock racing.
With the 120a and 17.5 with boost i dont need a fan which means that it weighs the same as an xtreme with a fan....
#3943
Tech Adept
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 129
From: essex, england
Put it this way the guy who won 11.5 at the titc used a 120a....In all honesty though you would not tell the difference between the 60/120 or extreme stock. In my opinion the 120 represents the best value due to it's ability to run mod but also costs the most



4Likes
angelo, it's there official on HW.
