|
Originally Posted by sizheng
(Post 8770742)
But drivers like M7H found it very good for his driving, so just keep it and wait for the better one comes out.)
Maybe I will try the 110211 tonight (thanks Angelo!) but I have the feeling it will not outperform 101224...
Originally Posted by Shawn68z
(Post 8771313)
Maybe HW could put a safety into the software that would make sure it turned off if the input voltage is OVER 4.3V ? This would prevent people from trying to run a high timing in their 2S Touring Cars.
Originally Posted by sizheng
(Post 8771966)
Thanks Shawn.
We will do more test under 1S situation. Actually the motor performance and efficiency under 1S is different from higher voltage. I think this is the reason it needs different settings (maybe also different method )for boost and turbo. Also try the 101224 then ofcourse!... But keep in mind, my settings work really good with an LRP X12 motor, but not on a LRP X11.... Don't ask me why, maybe you can do something with that information.... Maybe you can bring out a firmware dedicated for 1S...
Originally Posted by hacker
(Post 8771244)
instead of using 64 steps, I think it would be easier for the majority of people to understand using 100 steps or 100% boost timing.
Originally Posted by COBRARACING
(Post 8771950)
Great idea makes sense.
Sometimes it's so simple... :D Only don't make it 100 steps, because then you keep on pushing buttons, if you want to go down in a setting. Lets change 2% at a time (to save memory in the speedo)... :lol::sneaky::D |
Originally Posted by 2wdrive
(Post 8771967)
could you place FDR / RO (rollout for the pancar guys) on the setup sheet?
just knitpicking :D ps: Maybe also 1s or 2s? |
Originally Posted by COBRARACING
(Post 8765756)
Irgo it seems there is alot of bickering going on and this forum is for people who own hobbywings or want to purchase hobbywings information thread it is not for you or anyone else to have a battle .If you want to battle especially about rediculous childish stuff please leave the thread and when your ready to return and make an effort to the thread instead of argueing please let us know or the other outcome will be i ask the administrator to shut the whole thread down and customers can get in contact with me by email .
its up to you now . regards Angelo thanc |
Originally Posted by hacker
(Post 8771244)
instead of using 64 steps, I think it would be easier for the majority of people to understand using 100 steps or 100% boost timing.
I still don't see the benefit of going from real measurable degrees of timing to some arbitary "steps" or % of timing.:confused: Percent of what??? Nobody even seems to know how many actual degrees of timing the new softwares really has:( Who needs a finer adjustment of timing than 1degree? If anybody would it's only to go to 0.5degrees. As i have a Ballistic wich is fortunately marked in REAL degrees and have choosen to run firmware 1224 wich is also divided in REAL degrees, I can choose to remove/add a certain amount of timing on the endbell and simply add/remove that same amount in the speedcontroller in the same universal DEGREES!!! Anyting other than actual degrees is plain stupid. IMO. /Mattias |
Originally Posted by shano83
(Post 8771961)
Hey cherry looks good to me good job mate Now post the download link :sneaky:
|
+1
Hopefully i can run it on my Android phone:) |
Originally Posted by snabbgas
(Post 8772390)
+1
Hopefully i can run it on my Android phone:) Surely someone can program the LCD box functions into an App :nod: |
Originally Posted by cherry2blost
(Post 8772126)
That's what the notes section is, in part, for to allow tou to add different notes. Didn't want it to be too cluttered as in the old days, K.I.S.S :lol:
The TC got a nice box to put their FDR in and we have to put our rollout somewhere in the notes section?:flaming:;). You can add / RO behind the letters FDR ? so the box is for both FDR and ROllout :) |
Originally Posted by nietzbatik
(Post 8741408)
Anyone know the ESC setting for 11.5T that team Hobbywing used to Win in TITC 2011? i have race on sunday, i hope i can use that seting for my race (i use HW Xerun 120A V2.1 and HW 11.5T motor)
Thanks |
Originally Posted by zamrioo2
(Post 8772320)
hi angelo... just my thought... i think we should retune our mind how to convert IRGO post from sarcastic/arguement to good suggestion/share/theory/finding... dont really know how do he get those data, somehow his points are relevant and good to us to study back... every post which reply his post will become good gathered knowledge in this thread to become revision to everybody not only for HW community...
thanc I dont think irgo or cherry are bad guys i think they are both great people i just think it's more of a clash of different cultures,ego and personalities thats all and im sure it will all be good in the end . Here we are one family not individuals and thats what others dont like and what i mean by that other manufacturers etc . |
Deleted
|
yay!!
|
Originally Posted by snabbgas
(Post 8772379)
I still don't see the benefit of going from real measurable degrees of timing to some arbitary "steps" or % of timing.:confused:
Percent of what??? Nobody even seems to know how many actual degrees of timing the new softwares really has:( Who needs a finer adjustment of timing than 1degree? If anybody would it's only to go to 0.5degrees. As i have a Ballistic wich is fortunately marked in REAL degrees and have choosen to run firmware 1224 wich is also divided in REAL degrees, I can choose to remove/add a certain amount of timing on the endbell and simply add/remove that same amount in the speedcontroller in the same universal DEGREES!!! Anyting other than actual degrees is plain stupid. IMO. /Mattias at the end of the day, + is more and = is less, that's all I need to know. need more power>add more timing motor overheating<less timing |
Originally Posted by snabbgas
(Post 8772379)
I still don't see the benefit of going from real measurable degrees of timing to some arbitary "steps" or % of timing.:confused:
Percent of what??? Nobody even seems to know how many actual degrees of timing the new softwares really has:( Who needs a finer adjustment of timing than 1degree? If anybody would it's only to go to 0.5degrees. As i have a Ballistic wich is fortunately marked in REAL degrees and have choosen to run firmware 1224 wich is also divided in REAL degrees, I can choose to remove/add a certain amount of timing on the endbell and simply add/remove that same amount in the speedcontroller in the same universal DEGREES!!! Anyting other than actual degrees is plain stupid. IMO. /Mattias Go back to degrees, please! All this arguing only started post FW518. |
Originally Posted by cherry2blost
(Post 8772698)
Group HUG !!!!!
removed pics to save space http://www.mediafire.com/?50y7w4xgpssi86b PAN ^^^^^ http://www.mediafire.com/?cgkkmr5fifdzw87 TC ^^^^ Cherry xx at the moment I have to use a 'screen capture program' and save as jpg. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:57 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.