Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree70Likes

Transponder Hack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2023, 01:55 AM
  #61  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,410
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
Pretty sure I touched on that:
I could be wrong but you never mentioned the server side where all laps are registered and even race results if AMB race software was used.
Roelof is offline  
Old 12-29-2023, 05:16 AM
  #62  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,329
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
I could be wrong but you never mentioned the server side where all laps are registered and even race results if AMB race software was used.
I mentioned the support of the whole system. Live lap timing is but one of the features.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 12-31-2023, 09:31 PM
  #63  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (105)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S. California
Posts: 623
Trader Rating: 105 (100%+)
Default

From a cost to racer point of view (this has been briefly covered earlier in the thread) 10 key ‘hand counting’ with numbers clearly affixed to the car is the way to go.

this is not to difficult to do but generally requires a second person in race control to count the laps. When i race directed back in the late 90’s we ran this way. The draw back is that laps could get missed if people got distracted.

for club racing the .5 second that can be missed with hand counting does not matter, larger events need the accuracy of the transponder loop.

the ease (as stated earlier) of the transponders counting laps is very nice for the race director.

to the original title of ‘is there a transponder hack’ nope (for all the reasons stated above.

i have heard from people i know who run/bike that there are ‘passive systems’ that are much cheaper for the individual (given out in the event bibs) but the counters are exponentially more expensive.
TimF is offline  
Old 01-01-2024, 02:54 AM
  #64  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,112
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TimF
From a cost to racer point of view (this has been briefly covered earlier in the thread) 10 key ‘hand counting’ with numbers clearly affixed to the car is the way to go.

this is not to difficult to do but generally requires a second person in race control to count the laps. When i race directed back in the late 90’s we ran this way. The draw back is that laps could get missed if people got distracted.

for club racing the .5 second that can be missed with hand counting does not matter, larger events need the accuracy of the transponder loop.

the ease (as stated earlier) of the transponders counting laps is very nice for the race director.

to the original title of ‘is there a transponder hack’ nope (for all the reasons stated above.

i have heard from people i know who run/bike that there are ‘passive systems’ that are much cheaper for the individual (given out in the event bibs) but the counters are exponentially more expensive.
We hand counted for quite a while in our club. Our club was run by one of the nicest gentleman you could ever meet and his name was Dennis. You bought your "transponders" from him, he would sell you a set of 10 for $5 or so. They were puffy dots that you affixed to the outside of your car on the hood using the supplied velcro. You got 10 different colors and Dennis had his 10 computer keyboard number keys colored. He was amazing, I can't remember him ever missing a lap no matter how many people were running. He was affectionately referred to as Dennis and his Dots. But when we went to AMB, my OCD really kicked in because now I had a very accurate account of my lap times which allowed me to over analyze everything.
glennhl is offline  
Old 01-04-2024, 02:18 PM
  #65  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 66
Default

The other system that is used by a few tracks and much cheaper is iLap. It is IR based. The decoder is a few hundred dollars and the transponders are about $35. Is it cheaper than MyLaps? Yes, on a per unit basis. But given it requires line of sight, mounting it in each car is more involved than a MyLaps transponder. My local track uses iLap, so I’ve got to have the transponder either mounted outside the body or through a windshield pointing straight up to be read properly. With MyLaps, I’d be more open to just using one transponder and move it between cars as I don’t need as critical a mounting setup. With iLap, I have transponders for each car since it’s too much of a pain to swap between and get them reading consistently. And if they are mounted on top of the body, they are more likely to be damaged and need to be replaced. So, is it really cheaper than MyLaps? No.

Originally Posted by simple
I find it slightly ironic that some complain about a single$100 piece of equipment, that is effectively the “ticket” to participate in racing their $300 to $900 rc car.
Technically, it’s the cost of participation in organized racing. And you only need to pay it once per car. Average out per use, and the cost becomes insignificant.
Maybe some are forgetting the overall cost of the complete integrated system of software, loop, decoder, etc. How much is that?
That cost is almost entirely absorbed by the club or track facility. Where are the complaints about that?
I think some are taking for granted a system that works near flawlessly, keeps data accurately, times precisely, and helps organize so many people at so many events.
From that perspective, I’m thankful I only have to pay $100 to have the privilege of this technology and reliability.
I Use to race at a track where an employee had to hit number keys as cars wizzed by. Then a track where you were a numbskull if you forgot to put the transponder, the size of a micro servo, back in it charging dock after your heat. When personal transponders came out, it was glorious. I think complaining about what we have now is ignorant of how far it’s come and how good we have it.
Mac The Knife and gigaplex like this.
nielsm is offline  
Old 01-04-2024, 04:49 PM
  #66  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,607
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

We had a learning curve with ilaps. Now we are able to mount the PT almost anywhere (low on the chassis, sometimes under the painted hood, usually in same location as amb/mylaps) and it will still read accurately. Maybe the key to ilaps is on how the readers on the overhead bracket are installed.

I cannot tell the difference if I have ilaps or mylaps/amb on my car
rccartips is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 02:05 PM
  #67  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
I mentioned the support of the whole system. Live lap timing is but one of the features.

The support of the hardware where they only release updates that will make their older transponders obsolete?
skife is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 10:19 PM
  #68  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,329
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by skife
The support of the hardware where they only release updates that will make their older transponders obsolete?
That's been mentioned many times already. I was talking about something else.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-18-2024, 12:18 AM
  #69  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,410
Default

Originally Posted by skife
The support of the hardware where they only release updates that will make their older transponders obsolete?
As a designer of the whole system they have the right to do that to rule out others copying transponders in a bad way. It is not nice but the step was already set over a decade ago with a transponder exchange program which still exists. Somehow people can complain about this one in more than a decade action but easilly buy new cars, radio equipment, motors and tires every year.
andreas78, hunterdawg and nielsm like this.
Roelof is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 01:27 AM
  #70  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: SoCal
Posts: 55
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

This is actually right in my wheel house. I ran a timing software company for about 17 years and we were a distributor for MyLaps, as well as others. We had about 1600 customers paying about $750/months for our software in 70 different countries. Go karts, motocross, full size race tracks, shit even the Nurburgring used us.

Across all of those sports, Mylaps was always the heavy hitter. It cost the most by a long shot but man was it reliable. It was also good over 300mph which most wouldn't touch. There's nothing particularly innovative about it until you get into the big money stuff, GPS tracking, having 20 loops on your track, automated light controls, a central server to track all the decoders and ancillary devices. None of that really matters to RC.

There are tons of other viable timing hardware companies. Tag Heuer, DeHaardt, Pixel, LapSnapper, Race Result, Apex, Alien RFID.... All of them work, none of them were as reliable as MyLaps. I can tell you from the millions of laps our customers logged we hardly ever got a support call from a MyLaps customer. But they're still over priced mainly because of the market penetration they have. No track is going to alienate themselves by not having a ML decoder onsite. The only one I would think would have a shot at eating into their market is the RFID guys. Xponders are seriously $2 a pop and they're a small sticker you slap on the car. They're super resilient too. Only downside is you need an over head gantry for the antenna, doable but not idea. But at $2 a piece you could just give them a sticker with their entry fee. With all that said, that's just the hardware, there's a ton of software to manage race days, registration, live timing over web sockets, scoreboards, top times, yada yada yada...
simple, glennhl and Speed 8 like this.
Tricon is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 01:09 PM
  #71  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 499
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
As a designer of the whole system they have the right to do that to rule out others copying transponders in a bad way. It is not nice but the step was already set over a decade ago with a transponder exchange program which still exists. Somehow people can complain about this one in more than a decade action but easilly buy new cars, radio equipment, motors and tires every year.
Aside from the radio every single item you mentioned is a wear and tear item, to which some would even argue the sensors do wear out. I actually don’t see many racers buying radios every year but even if they did they don’t have to buy a new radio for every car they own.
revo_race is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 02:23 PM
  #72  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,329
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by revo_race
Aside from the radio every single item you mentioned is a wear and tear item, to which some would even argue the sensors do wear out. I actually don’t see many racers buying radios every year but even if they did they don’t have to buy a new radio for every car they own.
Radios wear out quicker than a transponder. Potentiometers don't last forever.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 02:33 PM
  #73  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,410
Default

Originally Posted by revo_race
Aside from the radio every single item you mentioned is a wear and tear item, to which some would even argue the sensors do wear out. I actually don’t see many racers buying radios every year but even if they did they don’t have to buy a new radio for every car they own.
Where did I say radio's, I did say radio equipment. Every year a new car and with that for sure new servo's and maybe a new receiver and some even every year a new transponder.
Roelof is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 03:20 PM
  #74  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
As a designer of the whole system they have the right to do that to rule out others copying transponders in a bad way. It is not nice but the step was already set over a decade ago with a transponder exchange program which still exists. Somehow people can complain about this one in more than a decade action but easilly buy new cars, radio equipment, motors and tires every year.

I only complain about it because it made the amb house transponder set obsolete.

Those of us that are already into racing, $110 for a transponder doesn't seem terrible. But to a dad that want to try racing with his 2 kids on the weekends, it adds a huge expense.
gigaplex likes this.
skife is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 03:30 PM
  #75  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 90
Default

I've got a couple ideas to solve the expensive transponder issue.


1. Build an open source decoder that will read mylaps transponders as well as open source transponders. Hardware cost could be brought down significantly.

2. Live time supports running multiple loops, will it support running 2 different decoders doing this? Could you run mylaps and trackmate at the same time?

3. Custom firmware for the mylaps decoders to open them back up to detect older transponders.

​​
skife is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.