Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro On-Road > Onroad Nitro Engine Zone
GT and Onroad engine dyno reports ! >

GT and Onroad engine dyno reports !

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

GT and Onroad engine dyno reports !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2016 | 01:04 PM
  #16  
Maximo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by RoketRdr
So what are they doing different with the GT class engines? I know they use a different liner and crankshaft but what's different with the liner? I'm going to be changing my GT engine to either the new Mito 35GT or the OS 21XZ-GT when it comes out. In the past I've always run the extra short or double-bend headers because I've gotten better top end with them. Should I be looking in another direction?
So far based off what I am seeing on the dyno is that if we are using a offroad manifold I would opt more towards a modified offroad then I would towards a modified onroad. The header length is just too long for a onroad engine to reach its potential and they see a huge power loss as compared to how they run on their respective onroad manifolds..Whereas I can make a offroad absolutely scream on a offroad manifold and carry a huge advantage over the onroad engines !
Maximo is offline  
Old 05-28-2016 | 01:10 PM
  #17  
RoketRdr's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 346
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Really appreciate the info you're providing. Its starting to take some of the "mystery" out of the GT engine class.
RoketRdr is offline  
Old 05-28-2016 | 03:04 PM
  #18  
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 528
From: Hong Kong
Default

Originally Posted by RoketRdr
So what are they doing different with the GT class engines? I know they use a different liner and crankshaft but what's different with the liner? I'm going to be changing my GT engine to either the new Mito 35GT or the OS 21XZ-GT when it comes out. In the past I've always run the extra short or double-bend headers because I've gotten better top end with them. Should I be looking in another direction?
Not really the crank timing, I got Tesla 5 port GT engine, it share the same crank shaft with 7 and 9 port on road engine. The port timing I guess is different.
beebone is offline  
Old 06-22-2016 | 04:54 PM
  #19  
RoketRdr's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 346
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Anything new to share with the group?
RoketRdr is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 07:10 AM
  #20  
Maximo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by RoketRdr
Anything new to share with the group?
Basically a few things


1. 9886 outperforms every single modern EFFRA approved pipe, more torque and more HP then every single one of them ....I have been testing everything I can get my hands on and with both onroad and offorad applications the 9886 makes more power then everything....So if in doubt just use a 9886 and tailor the manifold length to the engine, you will have more power and torque then any other combo you can buy from any of the manufactures bar none..This is universal on all engines too...not just Nova

2. Its all about the manifold !!!! matching the manifold length to the engine is critical... Basically sticking a offroad manifold onto a onroad engine kills its power..in a GT car with a offroad manifold you should not run onroad engines as the power will be down compared to a higher timed offroad engine with the same manifold... For a onroad engine to make its proper power and powerband it needs an onroad manifold........IMO this sort of makes some of GT engine rules arbitrary ..... one of my simple modified $300 offroad engines would decimate every single high end Onroad engine money can buy as long as they are both on a offroad manifold....swap to the onroad manifolds and of course it all changes !!!
Maximo is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 07:33 AM
  #21  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,044
From: Holland
Default

The best onroad pipe is the 2013 but saddly it is forbidden to use...

Lots of torque. OK no top RPM but with a larger gearing high speeds are possibe. But most important on my Novarossi engines 30 to 45 secconds more milage!
Roelof is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 07:41 AM
  #22  
RoketRdr's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 346
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo
Basically a few things


1. 9886 outperforms every single modern EFFRA approved pipe, more torque and more HP then every single one of them ....I have been testing everything I can get my hands on and with both onroad and offorad applications the 9886 makes more power then everything....So if in doubt just use a 9886 and tailor the manifold length to the engine, you will have more power and torque then any other combo you can buy from any of the manufactures bar none..This is universal on all engines too...not just Nova

2. Its all about the manifold !!!! matching the manifold length to the engine is critical... Basically sticking a offroad manifold onto a onroad engine kills its power..in a GT car with a offroad manifold you should not run onroad engines as the power will be down compared to a higher timed offroad engine with the same manifold... For a onroad engine to make its proper power and powerband it needs an onroad manifold........IMO this sort of makes some of GT engine rules arbitrary ..... one of my simple modified $300 offroad engines would decimate every single high end Onroad engine money can buy as long as they are both on a offroad manifold....swap to the onroad manifolds and of course it all changes !!!
Interesting. I was under the impression that the 9886 was just a reinforced 2015 for offroad use. Something definitely different between them with the results you're seeing. Sure wish they would get rid of the 7mm venturi rule. That would really open things up and let the GT class "fly".
RoketRdr is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 08:01 AM
  #23  
dan_vector's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,333
Default

Originally Posted by RoketRdr
Interesting. I was under the impression that the 9886 was just a reinforced 2015 for offroad use. Something definitely different between them with the results you're seeing. Sure wish they would get rid of the 7mm venturi rule. That would really open things up and let the GT class "fly".
Totally different pipes! The 9886 is 2 chamber and the 2015 is 3 chamber which is EFRA approved for noise reasons. We can't use the 9886 pipe in competition anymore due to the noise it makes. I agree though the power difference is huge!
dan_vector is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
Maximo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
The best onroad pipe is the 2013 but saddly it is forbidden to use...

Lots of torque. OK no top RPM but with a larger gearing high speeds are possibe. But most important on my Novarossi engines 30 to 45 secconds more milage!

I have the 2013 here.... I will test it on the onroad manifolds and see what I find.... I should retest it on the Nova offroad manifolds as well, as on the factory curved Werks offroad manifold it doesn't make the same juice as a 9886 does....
Maximo is offline  
Old 06-23-2016 | 01:16 PM
  #25  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,044
From: Holland
Default

My JP R09 on a 2015 pipe was hardly reaching 5 minutes, with the 2013 I could reach 5:30. On the worlds in Cordoba it did save met a pitstop in the qualify and finals. Normally the 2nd geat is 20/46, I was running 20/45
Roelof is offline  
Old 06-26-2016 | 02:35 AM
  #26  
dan_vector's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,333
Default

I'm also wandering how the onroad engines perform when fitted with an offroad carb! I've seen a few people locally do this with mixed results.
dan_vector is offline  
Old 06-28-2016 | 11:59 AM
  #27  
Maximo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Default

Originally Posted by dan_vector
I'm also wandering how the onroad engines perform when fitted with an offroad carb! I've seen a few people locally do this with mixed results.


There is no real power difference as far as I can see, however there is a definite difference in how quickly the tune stabilizes, the offroad carbs need a longer warmup for the tune to set
Maximo is offline  
Old 06-28-2016 | 12:53 PM
  #28  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 434
Default

anybody on here has some experience with the WERKS engine line in the GT class? I have been using both the B6 and B5 on my MGT7, so far, I am favoring the B5 because of the higher torque, but need to test on a high speed track...
thommi is offline  
Old 07-02-2016 | 12:02 AM
  #29  
invrtd's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,085
From: Florida
Default

So, for GT, you would suggest a cheaper offroad motor that is modified with a bit higher timing, than an onroad style GT motor. And of course the 9886 pipe. Looking at all the 5 port GT motors that are made specifically for GT, they all have higher Power Bands in RPM. I guess this would be good for flowing tracks compared to break and gas. Biggest thing for GT is heavier car. I want more bottom end but still have good top end for the straight away in second gear. So, you think you can make an Elite5 into a powerhouse GT motor with 032/9886 combo? Or is the new stock MITO 35GT 5 port better? ROAR kills me with the 5 port 7mm restrictor limitation.

Last edited by invrtd; 07-02-2016 at 12:55 AM.
invrtd is offline  
Old 07-02-2016 | 01:11 AM
  #30  
invrtd's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,085
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo


both engines are modified !!!
What engine is a mod32?
invrtd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.