R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Offroad Nitro Engine Forum (https://www.rctech.net/forum/offroad-nitro-engine-forum-157/)
-   -   NOVAROSSI Engine thread.... (https://www.rctech.net/forum/offroad-nitro-engine-forum/353301-novarossi-engine-thread.html)

houston 02-14-2012 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by mccoy (Post 10326779)
hi folks..need advice here ! already have a rossi 21-4c in my buggy. i just get a new 21-4 btt...but my 21-4c is running like a new! i'm just wondering which should a put in my buggy in which one in my truggy...thx for any advice!! a+

Older version in truck :nod:

function>form 02-14-2012 07:50 PM

ok novarossi guys... I want to order a motor asap but am torn between the plus 4 "tuned" for 239.99 on a amain or the plus 4 btta for 284.99 on a main. besides the new head design are there any other benefits of getting the new btta motor? is it worth the extra 45 bucks? thanks

houston 02-14-2012 11:40 PM


Originally Posted by function>form (Post 10329873)
ok novarossi guys... I want to order a motor asap but am torn between the plus 4 "tuned" for 239.99 on a amain or the plus 4 btta for 284.99 on a main. besides the new head design are there any other benefits of getting the new btta motor? is it worth the extra 45 bucks? thanks

plus 21-4buggy

Specifications:

Displacement: 3.5cc
Max. power: 2.60 hp
R.P.M (Max. power): 32,000
Practical RPM Range: 6,000-38,000
Crankshaft: Turbo SG
Carburetor Material: Plastic
Carburetor Type: Slide
Carburetor Adjustment: Single
Glow Plug: Standard
Exhaust: Rear

function>form 02-15-2012 04:33 AM

[QUOTE=houston;10330680]plus 21-4buggy

Specifications:

Displacement: 3.5cc
Max. power: 2.60 hp
R.P.M (Max. power): 32,000
Practical RPM Range: 6,000-38,000
Crankshaft: Turbo SG
Carburetor Material: Plastic
Carburetor Type: Slide
Carburetor Adjustment: Single
Glow Plug: Standard
Exhaust: Rear[/QUOT


Thanks, I'm a little confused because in the specs it says standard plug as you posted but in the description on a mains site it says "tuned" (turbo plug)

aussies1129 02-15-2012 04:43 AM

[QUOTE=function>form;10331139]

Originally Posted by houston (Post 10330680)
plus 21-4buggy

Specifications:

Displacement: 3.5cc
Max. power: 2.60 hp
R.P.M (Max. power): 32,000
Practical RPM Range: 6,000-38,000
Crankshaft: Turbo SG
Carburetor Material: Plastic
Carburetor Type: Slide
Carburetor Adjustment: Single
Glow Plug: Standard
Exhaust: Rear[/QUOT


Thanks, I'm a little confused because in the specs it says standard plug as you posted but in the description on a mains site it says "tuned" (turbo plug)

you will get the turbo head , I did the same and they sent me a standard head so I hit them up and they forwarded me a turbo head button at no charge, give the 21-4 a go mine is awesome in the truggy unreal runtime:nod:

arm2storm 02-16-2012 06:28 AM

What's the overall best engine for a buggy in the nova line of engines, Ive been reading through the forum and I've seen that the plus-4 is very popular. My question is why? Why not the bonito? How do both compare as far as fuel economy, bottom end and top end?

houston 02-16-2012 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by arm2storm (Post 10336567)
What's the overall best engine for a buggy in the nova line of engines, Ive been reading through the forum and I've seen that the plus-4 is very popular. My question is why? Why not the bonito? How do both compare as far as fuel economy, bottom end and top end?

Bonito can be a handful in buggy

Plus 4 very controlable power

Aussies1129- that is kinda weird that it has the description of a plus 21-4buggy which is standard but says turbo in the header description :confused:

mblgjr 02-16-2012 06:46 PM


Originally Posted by arm2storm (Post 10336567)
What's the overall best engine for a buggy in the nova line of engines, Ive been reading through the forum and I've seen that the plus-4 is very popular. My question is why? Why not the bonito? How do both compare as far as fuel economy, bottom end and top end?

Overall, the +4 and/or the X7 will work perfectly well.

The +4 is dead smooth and applies it's power very well in today's lightweight buggies. Overall, it's hard to argue with.

For *most* tracks, the Bonito doesn't really have a chance to stretch it's legs.

The X7 fills the void between the two and offers a broader range of flexibility, with slightly more midrange torque than the 4, without the "soft" bottom of the Bonito.

arm2storm 02-16-2012 09:44 PM


Originally Posted by mblgjr (Post 10339755)
Overall, the +4 and/or the X7 will work perfectly well.

The +4 is dead smooth and applies it's power very well in today's lightweight buggies. Overall, it's hard to argue with.

For *most* tracks, the Bonito doesn't really have a chance to stretch it's legs.

The X7 fills the void between the two and offers a broader range of flexibility, with slightly more midrange torque than the 4, without the "soft" bottom of the Bonito.

Which has better run times? Is the bonitos bottom too soft?


thnx

mblgjr 02-17-2012 01:21 PM


Originally Posted by arm2storm (Post 10340562)
Which has better run times? Is the bonitos bottom too soft?


thnx

The +4 is the *easiest* to achieve big runtimes with.

However, the X7 and Bonito can match it with a skilled driver and minimal effort; but if you're ham-fisted (triggered) on the throttle, stick with the 4.

The Bonito isn't *too* soft on a big track. Small tracks, yes I'd say so. But you'll find plenty of other opinions as well.

Lille-bror 02-17-2012 01:35 PM

Yearh, the Bonito was ok for Battle at the Euro 2011 :nod:

I bet he also used that at the GP in Montpillier

arm2storm 02-17-2012 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by mblgjr (Post 10343233)
The +4 is the *easiest* to achieve big runtimes with.

However, the X7 and Bonito can match it with a skilled driver and minimal effort; but if you're ham-fisted (triggered) on the throttle, stick with the 4.

The Bonito isn't *too* soft on a big track. Small tracks, yes I'd say so. But you'll find plenty of other opinions as well.

Thanks...that's exactly what i wanted to know.

thorns 02-17-2012 10:35 PM

Any suggestion on getting the little grub screw that determines the ball linkgae rotation out? The head has rounded out enough I cant get a grab on it with the driver. Usually would use dremmel etc, but a bit on the small side.

Hoping to race tomorrow, but need to get this thing rotated.


The screw on this is what I am talking about.
http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...Ball-Linkage-1

wyl03 02-18-2012 03:25 AM

i've been using a +4 that came with my *used* mbx6. despite it being 2nd hand, it has ran flawlessly.
just very recently, i was offered a good deal for another +4. it was too good to pass up. owner says it has got 3L under it, but it looks brand spanking new, if i have to say so myself.

UNFORTUNATELY .. engine had been left in the car in the garden shed for a number of months. when i pulled it apart, i can see what appears to be traces of rust developing (on the crank and inner bearing race), not a lot but noticable enough. what would be the best way to get rid of them?
- change every part that is rusted? :rolleyes:
- run it as per normal .. will that "burn" up the rust? :D
- flood with ARO before running ... ? :confused:

any suggestions, pls? thanks in advance.

Herrsavage 02-18-2012 08:31 AM

Quick question: I have an older REX P215RS (basically, an older version of the NR P5XLT afaik..), that was also modded from what I understand for more top end. I have a 9901/short header on it, and it's in my DM-1. The car has a nice top end with this engine and pipe, but lacks explosiveness. I know it's a .21 and so never will have the oomph of a .28. I was just wondering if it would be worth trying a Dynamite 053 on it? Otherwise I'm just thinking this car needs a .28... So anyway, how should a basic NR engine respond going from a 9901/short to an 053? Thanks.


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 04:52 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.