RB Concept Engine Thread..
#768
What pipe does your friend use to get the most BOTTOM END out of his "WS-9"? I also have mine in a truggy, but it seems that the "punch" isn't there.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.
It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.
#769
What pipe does your friend use to get the most BOTTOM END out of his "WS-9"? I also have mine in a truggy, but it seems that the "punch" isn't there.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.
It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.
WS engines are a shorter stroke Buggy engine, they never will have great bottom end for a Truggy...no matter what you do it will be soft on the bottom...they are top end Buggy engines...not Truggy engines....
#771
that suck's... time to start shopping for a new engine.
Thanks, T.
#772
#773
the strongest of the .21's is the Picco .21...IMHO it has more power then even the .24 sized engines..... Some say its too much motor for Buggy, but its perfect for Truggy..... I have modified Picco P7R EVO 3 engines in stock..they are smooth and powerful and have massive bottom end power that would have your truggy dancing like its never danced before....
#774
the strongest of the .21's is the Picco .21...IMHO it has more power then even the .24 sized engines..... Some say its too much motor for Buggy, but its perfect for Truggy..... I have modified Picco P7R EVO 3 engines in stock..they are smooth and powerful and have massive bottom end power that would have your truggy dancing like its never danced before....
Thanks, T.
#776
B9 is a long stroke, it would be a great .21 engine for a truggy. Before I started running my K9 I owned two C6 (B9). I could clutch them low and never have a problem. Match it with a short header like the RB 2045/192 combo.
#777
I love the C6 too...it is my ultimate Buggy engine LOL ! I have several modified ones that are absolutely ballistic and have the sweetest exhaust note ever...They are also surprisingly very good on fuel, even better then my V-Spec... The engine has tons of power, but its power is delivered in such a way that the tires maintain good traction.. even on a slick track they will pull the nose of a buggy skyward halfway down the straight.. Most other engine would just spin the tires off, but the modded C6 just plants and shoots like a rocket....awesome engine ! too bad it costs so dam much !
#778
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 534
[QUOTE=8ight352;6687423]What pipe does your friend use to get the most BOTTOM END out of his "WS-9"? I also have mine in a truggy, but it seems that the "punch" isn't there.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.
It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.[/QUOTE
Maximo-aaronjoy are right you need to a different motor. I have a beast of a C6LG2 with MX ceramics that has all the bottom end you could ever need. I run a XB808 and it is just too much!!! The rear end was all over the place no matter how I tried to lay off the throttle. I need to sell or swap it for a buggy motor.
I have a lot more punch more bottom-end & more control speed out of a low end 3-port engine, don't get me wrong, the WS-9 is a bad ass engine... and I love "RB" motors. Just a little stumped
on tuning of this bottom-end.It's not a fuel tune issue... I believe it's about finding the right pipe!
I've tried the, RB-2045, JP-2 & the AE-2035.
Any help would be awesome, Thanks, T.[/QUOTE
Maximo-aaronjoy are right you need to a different motor. I have a beast of a C6LG2 with MX ceramics that has all the bottom end you could ever need. I run a XB808 and it is just too much!!! The rear end was all over the place no matter how I tried to lay off the throttle. I need to sell or swap it for a buggy motor.
#780
Its never the rod its the piston the bottom half of it. The first time was in a rythem section and today it was coming out of a corner. Both times l ran 1 Quart of fuel before l even starting to lean them out. Idled 5 tanks starting at 150, 160, 170, 180, 190 ect then put it on the track and basically finished like you would a traxxis motor no long straights and on and off the throttle getting longer and longer pulls. This is how l have done ALL of my engine the same way and never any problems.
Regards,
Ashton
Regards,
Ashton

I think the rod is still good!!

Last edited by aaron joy; 12-07-2009 at 05:27 PM.



2Likes
