Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

RB Concept Engine Thread..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2011 | 11:43 AM
  #2221  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Default

Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
Big_one is offline  
Old 07-08-2011 | 11:50 AM
  #2222  
Chris Peralta's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,192
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Big_one
Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
I have tried the Shark9 in truggy and it just didn't have enough grunt for my liking, but I run at 6,000 feet elevation so I am losing 15-20% of the engines overall power right off the bat. It felt better in truck when the Shark9 had a ceramic bearing but I still I felt I could use a bit more power. It's very possible it will have plenty of power at sea level!!
Chris Peralta is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 03:40 AM
  #2223  
TIX's Avatar
TIX
Tech Master
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,975
From: Melbourne Australia
Default

I wasnt to much a fan of the shark in the truggy. lacked bottom end. on a big open track it was great. it reved harder than the b10

Chris will the 2087 pipe give me any advantage over the 2045 pipe on a C6USA?
TIX is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 06:29 AM
  #2224  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

Originally Posted by Big_one
Clutch set up in truggy is green and gold spring with dynamite max life shoes. Chris, what do you thing of shark9 in truggy?
Change out your green springs to the silver springs, green is too light for the dynamite shoes, they are really hard shoes, with the gold and silver combo, you should have better snap, than with green and gold.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 06:37 AM
  #2225  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

Originally Posted by TIX
I wasnt to much a fan of the shark in the truggy. lacked bottom end. on a big open track it was great. it reved harder than the b10

Chris will the 2087 pipe give me any advantage over the 2045 pipe on a C6USA?
From what Chris had posted in an earleir post, the 2087 is smoother with better fuel mileage, than the 2045. If you have a B10, those are pretty much the same as the C6, if you want more bottom, RB has the 204 header that will give you more bottom.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 07:33 AM
  #2226  
Tech Master
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,807
From: Virginia
Default

Any of you RB engine gurus happen to have a spare C6 turbo
head button, that you could let go of for a decent price ?
rageworks is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 08:34 AM
  #2227  
Chris Peralta's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,192
From: Colorado
Default

The 2087 is a smoother transition from mid to high but I feel it does make more torque down low than the 2045 makes. I have been running the 2087 on what is basically a C6USA as it's a B10 with a C6USA crank and button. I have been running it in my truggy and it seems to run great and even with a steel flywheel it has plenty of grunt. In the truck I can notice the loss in top speed when compared to the 2045, but it's not too bad.
Chris Peralta is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #2228  
Chris Peralta's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,192
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by rageworks
Any of you RB engine gurus happen to have a spare C6 turbo
head button, that you could let go of for a decent price ?
I am out of town right now, but I am sure I do have one. Send me a PM reminding me to look.
Chris Peralta is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 10:53 AM
  #2229  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Peralta
The 2087 is a smoother transition from mid to high but I feel it does make more torque down low than the 2045 makes. I have been running the 2087 on what is basically a C6USA as it's a B10 with a C6USA crank and button. I have been running it in my truggy and it seems to run great and even with a steel flywheel it has plenty of grunt. In the truck I can notice the loss in top speed when compared to the 2045, but it's not too bad.
Depending on the truggy your using, On losi truggy, Im running a 48 tooth spur gear, on a C6, 2045/192, no complaints.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 07-09-2011 | 08:09 PM
  #2230  
Chris Peralta's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,192
From: Colorado
Default

I too run a Losi truck.... I have tried the 48 and also have a 49 tooth I have tried. With my altitude I really notice the loss in power on the bottom end so I normally end up back with the 50. Plus we are not lucky enough to have a track as big as the nitro pit so it works for me almost everywhere. Next I want to try running this new 2087 pipe with the 204mm header and the 48 tooth spur.
Chris Peralta is offline  
Old 07-10-2011 | 09:04 AM
  #2231  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Peralta
I too run a Losi truck.... I have tried the 48 and also have a 49 tooth I have tried. With my altitude I really notice the loss in power on the bottom end so I normally end up back with the 50. Plus we are not lucky enough to have a track as big as the nitro pit so it works for me almost everywhere. Next I want to try running this new 2087 pipe with the 204mm header and the 48 tooth spur.
Sounds good for you to try the 2087/204, I would think with that combo, it would work well for you in Colorado. We are very lucky to have all the different track we have in Arizona, at least we have 5, just inthe metro Phoenix area, varying in different sizes and layouts, with the Nitro Pit the largest, I really don't change, if any, from track to track, tires, or braking mainly.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 07-10-2011 | 08:56 PM
  #2232  
camiloro's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 72
Default

good day, i have a dude.

my old WS9 is dead, y wanted a new RB, i see a killer 10, and X11, this two engien, have more botton end, with my old WS9????

wich one two engine, is more similar to my old ws9
camiloro is offline  
Old 07-10-2011 | 09:31 PM
  #2233  
Chris Peralta's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,192
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by camiloro
good day, i have a dude.

my old WS9 is dead, y wanted a new RB, i see a killer 10, and X11, this two engien, have more botton end, with my old WS9????

wich one two engine, is more similar to my old ws9

The X11 is closer to your WS9. The K10 is more of a sport engine and is not made by Novarossi like the X11 and your WS9.
Chris Peralta is offline  
Old 07-10-2011 | 11:43 PM
  #2234  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 199
Default

The x11 is a 3 port,The Fire 11, 7 port is closer to the WS9.
kyosho28 is offline  
Old 07-11-2011 | 01:04 AM
  #2235  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 168
Default

Really loving the c6 l2g in the buggy now massive power!
Rolled over once or twice and cut so I upped the idle but what a beast it is!
Ginters is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.