R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Nitro On-Road (https://www.rctech.net/forum/nitro-road-3/)
-   -   Serpent 710 (https://www.rctech.net/forum/nitro-road/27070-serpent-710-a.html)

jfc_tech 04-01-2004 02:21 AM


originally posted by InitialD on other thread
I have a Shooter 4 mm chassis for my 705. I saw a Shooter aluminum middle bearing block and a hollow 2 speed main shaft option for the 950. Recently, I saw that they have a lighweight main shaft for 710 too.
cool...lightweight shaft...are ye using it already D? Is it in stock in semenanjung already?

sparksy 04-01-2004 03:15 AM

I have the shaft. Its not a bad little bit of kit. From memory it is a 10gm weight saving over stock.

BaxterC 04-01-2004 03:32 AM


Originally posted by sparksy
I have the shaft. Its not a bad little bit of kit. From memory it is a 10gm weight saving over stock.
what sort of a performance increase does that give you on acceleration?

GlennCauley 04-01-2004 03:53 AM

Nice work, Jabroni !
 
Jabroni, that is sure some nice work!

Wish mine looked as clean... I have wires bundled atop the steering servo, not hidden. :(

Curious about one thing... with the expenditure on alloy parts and SSG, why did you keep the stock plastic radiotray support?
I would think that would be the FIRST thing you would replace with an alloy part to increase torsional stiffness.

Marcos.J 04-01-2004 05:29 AM


Originally posted by BaxterC
what sort of a performance increase does that give you on acceleration?
it should accelerate faster since it has less rotating mass!

BaxterC 04-01-2004 05:40 AM


Originally posted by Marcos.S710
it should accelerate faster since it has less rotating mass!
True, but right in the beginning of the forum, I cant remember who it was, but I think it was Julius who said that the lighter shaft will make very little difference to the acceleration. However, I would think it would make a difference, as the overall weight is affected and that will make the difference. But I think the titanium shaft will be much more resilient to damage.

Can you see the difference in acceleration?

Marcos.J 04-01-2004 05:41 AM

Re: Radio Tray Work
 
http://members.cox.net/swrc/4.JPG
i will be afraid to run that car and get it dirty:)

pelos 04-01-2004 07:37 AM

My beloved 710
 
Hope you enjoy it

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fapoles/rc/Stratus.jpg

John Fontaine 04-01-2004 07:38 AM

That's nice looking! :nod:

InitialD 04-01-2004 07:40 AM


Originally posted by jfc_tech
cool...lightweight shaft...are ye using it already D? Is it in stock in semenanjung already?
I have the 3Racing titanium shaft on the 710. So does crashed_1. Did not weight it but it is certainly lighter than the stock one.

InitialD 04-01-2004 07:51 AM

Re: Nice work, Jabroni !
 

Originally posted by GlennCauley
Curious about one thing... with the expenditure on alloy parts and SSG, why did you keep the stock plastic radiotray support?
I would think that would be the FIRST thing you would replace with an alloy part to increase torsional stiffness.

Just guessing here but I think it's because he has not have them yet?;)

InitialD 04-01-2004 07:52 AM


Originally posted by BaxterC
True, but right in the beginning of the forum, I cant remember who it was, but I think it was Julius who said that the lighter shaft will make very little difference to the acceleration.
You are right. Somebody mentioned about it. I believe it was Michael Salven. It was actually to give a reason why the shaft on the 710 was not hollow. The weight reduction in terms of rotational mass is insignificant considering the fact that a hollow shaft would greatly reduce strenght. Rotational mass savings would be insignificant due to the mass being centered very closely to the rotational axis.


Originally posted by BaxterC
However, I would think it would make a difference, as the overall weight is affected and that will make the difference. But I think the titanium shaft will be much more resilient to damage.
Yes you are right. No doubt that there is some savings in rotational mass as well as static mass. Don't know about being more resilient though. I know that the 2 speed shaft on the 705 is pretty susceptible to bending upon impact.


Originally posted by BaxterC
Can you see the difference in acceleration?
I guess ! :rolleyes: :lol:

Marcos.J 04-01-2004 08:27 AM


Originally posted by InitialD
You are right. Somebody mentioned about it. I believe it was Michael Salven. It was actually to give a reason why the shaft on the 710 was not hollow. The weight reduction in terms of rotational mass is insignificant considering the fact that a hollow shaft would greatly reduce strenght. Rotational mass savings would be insignificant due to the mass being centered very closely to the rotational axis.



Yes you are right. No doubt that there is some savings in rotational mass as well as static mass. Don't know about being more resilient though. I know that the 2 speed shaft on the 705 is pretty susceptible to bending upon impact.



I guess ! :rolleyes: :lol:

so for impact purposes ,leave the stock shaft for reliability!

InitialD 04-01-2004 08:37 AM


Originally posted by Marcos.S710
so for impact purposes ,leave the stock shaft for reliability!
I think the stock shaft on the 710 is much better than on the 705. Anyway, if the 3Racing shafts are indeed of good titanium grade (which I think they are), then it should hold up.

p/s: Congrats ! You've reach your 1st 1000 posts ! ;) :D

Marcos.J 04-01-2004 08:43 AM


Originally posted by InitialD
I think the stock shaft on the 710 is much better than on the 705. Anyway, if the 3Racing shafts are indeed of good titanium grade (which I think they are), then it should hold up.

p/s: Congrats ! You've reach your 1st 1000 posts ! ;) :D

thank you only 8,000 more to go to catch you:D


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 02:52 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.