Engine Wars Thread
#406
Nova RR12L
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
. But with longer strock and ROAR, IFMAR and efra ruls of 4.5 mm exhaust windows height-it will have tighter timing on transfer and exhuast (Stefan says windows look the same). So, without modding this will be more torq and less top end, but with better milage.
. But with longer strock and ROAR, IFMAR and efra ruls of 4.5 mm exhaust windows height-it will have tighter timing on transfer and exhuast (Stefan says windows look the same). So, without modding this will be more torq and less top end, but with better milage.
1. EFRA doesn't limits Exhaust transfer height. Ran a sleeve on a very large track (Lostallo - Swiss) with more than 4.6mm of transfer height (low-end was completely killed, but talk about high speed -engine sound was wickening on all the backstraight- ).
2. That slightly longer stroke will be beneficial (IMHO) because the increased dwell time at TDC, powerband will be different from RS12/NS12, but I bet that new engine will be 'something boring' on high traction tracks due to their sweeter powerband and how develops the power (Attention to this...). Probably will not be soft at low-end and more like an electric motor like. Think on it like a truck engine with an almost flat torque curve.
3. Figuring a longer dwell time (uhm, a slightly longer conrod to round this will be perfect), engine will be slightly more fuel efficient, because it has more time to push the piston downwards, probably can authorize more static CR to make it more efficient.
4. Longer stroke means higher linear velocity of the piston and more inertia, so 'theorically' less ability to hold the high rpms that we're getting nowadays.
5. Trying to figure the timing of an engine who no one has seen it is futile, better to wait to see it and degree it. But much probably will be quite similar with more 'lobe centerline' on their distribution scheme talking in the '4 stroke jargon' - not much, but probably make a difference. On the .21's this made their magic and made it more controlable.
Last edited by Corse-R; 10-02-2003 at 01:08 PM.
#407
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
Location of windows doesn't change timing duration. So, I still stay on assuming with 4.5mm exhaust height, it will be tight exhaust . We still need 34 to 40 deg difference between transfer and exhaust in order to pipe work properly.
Location of windows doesn't change timing duration. So, I still stay on assuming with 4.5mm exhaust height, it will be tight exhaust . We still need 34 to 40 deg difference between transfer and exhaust in order to pipe work properly.
Probably (and I'm making some guesses) their induction transfers will be slightly larger (I bet about .10mm higher to have more induction time), but located on the same 'height' or timing.
Read it on the traduction that altavista made from the page that sleeve will be slightly thicker (2,5mm thick), this changes too the shape of the transfers, making specially the boost more steeper (any want to bet that they changed the boost transfer height too?)
Last edited by Corse-R; 10-02-2003 at 01:10 PM.
#408
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
just by observing the way engines were
teched for the roar nats 4.5 mi. port height
was measured from bottom dead center.
they would set the dial at zero from the
pistons bottom position and they would
raise the piston 4.5 mil. and if the ehxaust
port is still open then the engine was failed.
that is why you had engine modifiers shaving
the outside lip of the sleeve so it will sit lower
in the casing however mil. they went overl.
So i guess for roar they measure how much
exhaust opening you have from the pistons
upward stroke till it is fully closed.
as for crank timing they did not measure that.
they just took a look at the diameter of the
crank outlet facing the backplate.
teched for the roar nats 4.5 mi. port height
was measured from bottom dead center.
they would set the dial at zero from the
pistons bottom position and they would
raise the piston 4.5 mil. and if the ehxaust
port is still open then the engine was failed.
that is why you had engine modifiers shaving
the outside lip of the sleeve so it will sit lower
in the casing however mil. they went overl.
So i guess for roar they measure how much
exhaust opening you have from the pistons
upward stroke till it is fully closed.
as for crank timing they did not measure that.
they just took a look at the diameter of the
crank outlet facing the backplate.
#409
Originally posted by Corse-R
Location of windows and their height affect to the distribution scheme globally, a change of .25mm on the transfers makes it a great difference.
Probably (and I'm making some guesses) their induction transfers will be slightly larger (I bet about .10mm higher to have more induction time), but located on the same 'height' or timing.
Read it on the traduction that altavista made from the page that sleeve will be slightly thicker (2,5mm thick), this changes too the shape of the transfers, making specially the boost more steeper (any want to bet that they changed the boost transfer height too?)
Location of windows and their height affect to the distribution scheme globally, a change of .25mm on the transfers makes it a great difference.
Probably (and I'm making some guesses) their induction transfers will be slightly larger (I bet about .10mm higher to have more induction time), but located on the same 'height' or timing.
Read it on the traduction that altavista made from the page that sleeve will be slightly thicker (2,5mm thick), this changes too the shape of the transfers, making specially the boost more steeper (any want to bet that they changed the boost transfer height too?)
Location ( the same as timing duration) of exhaust port dictate by ROAR, EFRA, IFMAR etc regulation and location of transfer ports and buster are dictate by common sence design. If you decide to make timing duration let's say some number-it will automaticaly bring you to sertain place and you will not be able to change it. On the exhaust and transfer duration you can't make it open earlier and close later or opposite, it is semetric from both side, so realy doesn't metter location, just make sure you keep in regulations and common design sence.
#410
Re: Nova RR12L
Originally posted by Corse-R
Uhm. Some interesting points that may shed some more light and some more Q's to put some life on this thread that I find very interesting.
1. EFRA doesn't limits Exhaust transfer height.
Uhm. Some interesting points that may shed some more light and some more Q's to put some life on this thread that I find very interesting.
1. EFRA doesn't limits Exhaust transfer height.
#411
Originally posted by jwf_frani
just by observing the way engines were teched for the roar nats 4.5 mi. port height was measured from bottom dead center. they would set the dial at zero from the pistons bottom position and they would raise the piston 4.5 mil. and if the ehxaust port is still open then the engine was failed.
that is why you had engine modifiers shaving the outside lip of the sleeve so it will sit lower in the casing however mil. they went overl. So i guess for roar they measure how much exhaust opening you have from the pistons upward stroke till it is fully closed.
just by observing the way engines were teched for the roar nats 4.5 mi. port height was measured from bottom dead center. they would set the dial at zero from the pistons bottom position and they would raise the piston 4.5 mil. and if the ehxaust port is still open then the engine was failed.
that is why you had engine modifiers shaving the outside lip of the sleeve so it will sit lower in the casing however mil. they went overl. So i guess for roar they measure how much exhaust opening you have from the pistons upward stroke till it is fully closed.
For example. Nova engines have their exhaust port slightly over the piston at their BDC, don't know this measure, but think about 0.10 or 0.15mm over the piston at BDC, the measure isn't real.
Unique way of measuring correctly is to remove the sleeve from the crankcase and measure it with a machined 4.51mm feeler gauge. If gauge enters, the sleeve isn't legal, if not fits is legal. Simple and clear.
BTW: There's much hype about how to measure the port height and found many ways to measure it, some times and depending how measured a sleeve can be deemed legal or illegal depending on how is measured.
#412
Re: Re: Nova RR12L
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
I hope I understood you right-you mean transfer, not exhaust.
I hope I understood you right-you mean transfer, not exhaust.
BTW: Working on timing is the same as working in height, are two ways to find the same, but for avoiding the hassle of measuring and talking about exhaust events with a pair of degrees wheel is commonly named with the height (height of a known port can be translated into degrees and viceversa).
#413
Re: Re: Re: Nova RR12L
Originally posted by Corse-R
BTW: Working on timing is the same as working in height, are two ways to find the same, but for avoiding the hassle of measuring and talking about exhaust events with a pair of degrees wheel is commonly named with the height (height of a known port can be translated into degrees and viceversa).
BTW: Working on timing is the same as working in height, are two ways to find the same, but for avoiding the hassle of measuring and talking about exhaust events with a pair of degrees wheel is commonly named with the height (height of a known port can be translated into degrees and viceversa).
Don't worry about english, my english much worse then yours At work I also have to speak in spanish too, that one is real sucks
#414
Originally posted by Corse-R
Unique way of measuring correctly is to remove the sleeve from the crankcase and measure it with a machined 4.51mm feeler gauge. If gauge enters, the sleeve isn't legal, if not fits is legal. Simple and clear.
Unique way of measuring correctly is to remove the sleeve from the crankcase and measure it with a machined 4.51mm feeler gauge. If gauge enters, the sleeve isn't legal, if not fits is legal. Simple and clear.
#415
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
I think ROAR and EFRA and IFMAR rulls state-exhaust height is must to be 4.5 mm and it mesure from the highest point of the piston in BDC to highest point of the top of exhaust port on sleeve. So It can be done custom engine where psiton will go below botom line of exhaust port on sleeve and this method will be not correct (according to ROAR, EFRA, EFMAR ect).
I think ROAR and EFRA and IFMAR rulls state-exhaust height is must to be 4.5 mm and it mesure from the highest point of the piston in BDC to highest point of the top of exhaust port on sleeve. So It can be done custom engine where psiton will go below botom line of exhaust port on sleeve and this method will be not correct (according to ROAR, EFRA, EFMAR ect).
#416
Originally posted by AMGRacer
At IFMAR events the exhaust timing is checked with a derlin (or plastic) 4.5mm cylindrical bung which is inserted into the engine through the top of the sleeve. The piston is pushed down to BDC and if there is a gap between the top of the exhaust opening and the top of the bung it is illegal.
At IFMAR events the exhaust timing is checked with a derlin (or plastic) 4.5mm cylindrical bung which is inserted into the engine through the top of the sleeve. The piston is pushed down to BDC and if there is a gap between the top of the exhaust opening and the top of the bung it is illegal.
#417
Originally posted by AMGRacer
At IFMAR events the exhaust timing is checked with a derlin (or plastic) 4.5mm cylindrical bung which is inserted into the engine through the top of the sleeve. The piston is pushed down to BDC and if there is a gap between the top of the exhaust opening and the top of the bung it is illegal.
At IFMAR events the exhaust timing is checked with a derlin (or plastic) 4.5mm cylindrical bung which is inserted into the engine through the top of the sleeve. The piston is pushed down to BDC and if there is a gap between the top of the exhaust opening and the top of the bung it is illegal.
#418
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
Any news from your nats?
Any news from your nats?
#419
Originally posted by AMGRacer
Rain. Bad news
Rain. Bad news
#420
Originally posted by Top Gun 777
Yep, it is realy bad news. Any good prognosis for next couple days?
Yep, it is realy bad news. Any good prognosis for next couple days?
I hope they are right!!!