Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Micro and Mini Scales
Mini-96 World Challenge >

Mini-96 World Challenge

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree3035Likes

Mini-96 World Challenge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2023 | 12:50 PM
  #1696  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,159
Default

Originally Posted by Panther6834
In any vehicle, any class, any scale, a racer is always welcome to "turn down" throttle control in their Tx (or ESC, It's the ESC has that as a programming option). But, in regards to any 'spec' class is racing, whatever is 'specified' MUST be followed.

For example, two classes a lot of people confuse are "Spec Slash", and "Stock Spec Slash". Both are 'spec' classes...but, one (Stock Spec Slash) has more stringent specifications. The point is, whatever is stared by a class' "specifications", they MUST be followed. Now, anytime not covered by the 'specs' CAN be changed/adjusted/modified/upgraded.

Hope this helps.
My comment was towards your comment "WHY in the world would you want to make your vehicle slower" not on the legality of a slower motor.

2wd open is the only class that might benefit from the 2500kv motor and any motor is allowed so the legality would not be an issue.
Poor_Boy is offline  
Old 03-10-2023 | 01:49 PM
  #1697  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 788
From: Central NC, US
Default

Originally Posted by AlvBo
I've got a newbie question. If a particular class sets a imitation, for example, Stock class = 3500KV, can I use 2500KV? And similarly, Box Stock class = 7T pinion, can I use 6T?
In Box Stock, the rules say "OEM White End bell Motor unmodified, 7T Pinion are both mandatory" so you cannot use a 6T. As for motors, you have to use one of the motors specified, so no 2500 in Stock.
Traveler2 is offline  
Old 03-11-2023 | 12:10 AM
  #1698  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Panther6834
Stated specs for any race class, in any scale, are never "limitations"...they are designated specs that must be followed. Besides, in regards to racing (any vehicle, any class, any scale), WHY in the world would you want to make your vehicle slower ???
Thanks Panther6834, Traveler2 and Poor_Boy for the clarification. I had the impression the stated pinion and motors in the rules were "limits", and thought of downsizing the motor as I feel 3500KV was too fast for M96 tracks. Looks like apart from Open 2WD/4WD, I'll have to continue limiting the motor power at transmitter/ ESC.
AlvBo is offline  
Old 03-29-2023 | 04:08 PM
  #1699  
danjoy25's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,203
Default

Class- Stock
Date- March 2023
Location- Sydney
Race Time- 4:55.954
Fastest Lap-3.617
Chassis-MR03
Body-Mosler
Wheelbase-98mm
Tires-Kyosho Radials 30f/20r
Motor- PN70t
Batteries- R1
Front Springs-PN Racing
T-Plate-
Motor Mount-PN Racing
Dampener (If applicable)-none
Dampener Fluid (If applicable)-none
Gearing-


Notes-
danjoy25 is offline  
Old 03-29-2023 | 04:19 PM
  #1700  
danjoy25's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,203
Default

Class- Box Stock
Date- March 2023
Location-Sydney
Race Time-4:57.533
Fastest Lap-3.642
Chassis-MR03
Body-GL Lambo
Wheelbase-98mm
Tires-Kyosho Radials tyres 30f/20r
Motor-Stock
Batteries-R1
Front Springs-stock
T-Plate-5mm fibreglass
Motor Mount-stock
Dampener (If applicable)-
Dampener Fluid (If applicable)-
Gearing-
Notes-

Last edited by danjoy25; 03-29-2023 at 07:53 PM.
danjoy25 is offline  
Old 03-29-2023 | 04:24 PM
  #1701  
danjoy25's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,203
Default

Class-2wd open
Date- March 2023
Location-Sydney
Race Time-4:52.212
Fastest Lap-3.442
Chassis-GL GTR
Body-Mosler
Wheelbase-98mm
Tires-Kyosho Radials tyres 30f/20r
Motor-3500kv
Batteries-GL lipo
Front Springs-
T-Plate-
Motor Mount-
Dampener (If applicable)-
Dampener Fluid (If applicable)-
Gearing-
Notes-
danjoy25 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 02:14 AM
  #1702  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 10
Default

CLASS- STOCK
Date- 03/30/2023
Location- Jakarta, Indonesia
Race Time- 298.5 s
Fastest Lap- 3.57 s
Chassis- MR 03 Evo
Body- Jomurema GT 01
Wheelbase- 98 mm
Tires- Kyosho superlow mzw40-30, Marka V10r10
Motor- Kyosho 4100
Batteries- Xtar
Front Springs- Kyosho inner tube Orange
T-Plate- Kyosho 0.5 Hard
Motor Mount- R246 MML
Dampener (If applicable)- Disc damper
Dampener Fluid (If applicable)- 350 cst
Gearing- 8/44


Doubledarth is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 06:27 AM
  #1703  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 669
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Traveler2
Looks like Kyosho America has the yellow NSX ASC in stock. I'd go with that one over the McLarens for Box Stock. MZP233Y
What about the Audi R8 (in comparison to/against the NSX)?

I've been running the SC430 Petronas on my 'Box Stock' (MR-03), and the McLaren Senna on my 'Stock' (MR-03 EVO, soon to be replaced with a PNR2.5). I'm strongly considering "retiring" the Senna, moving the SC430 to the PNR2.5, and getting a new body for the MR-03. I've already picked up an R8 (MZP246AS), but am still undecided whether to run it on the MR-03, or my MA-020 'AWD Box Stock' (our local club runs an 'AWD Box Stock' class). If the R8 ends up on the MR-03, then I already have a body in mind for the MA-020...but, if I decide to put the R8 on the MA-020, then I need some other "options" for the MR-03. Once I can get the Mini96 track set up, I'll start gathering times for M96 WC (btw, the EVO will still be used, but for another M96 WC class). And, yes, I know that, technically, I could run the same body on more than one chassis/class...but, like most, I'd prefer having different bodies for different chassis/classes.
Panther6834 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 06:38 AM
  #1704  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 669
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Poor_Boy
My comment was towards your comment "WHY in the world would you want to make your vehicle slower" not on the legality of a slower motor. 2wd open is the only class that might benefit from the 2500kv motor and any motor is allowed so the legality would not be an issue.
No worries...all is good. The not-so-wonderful thing about forums is that, when someone replies, it can be difficult (sometimes, impossible) for others to determine if the person was serious, joking, or somewhere in-between. That happens to me a lot when I respond with sardonic humor...lol

Originally Posted by AlvBo
Thanks Panther6834, Traveler2 and Poor_Boy for the clarification. I had the impression the stated pinion and motors in the rules were "limits", and thought of downsizing the motor as I feel 3500KV was too fast for M96 tracks. Looks like apart from Open 2WD/4WD, I'll have to continue limiting the motor power at transmitter/ ESC.
That works...or, you could learn better throttle control (something I am, admittedly, still working on where Mini-Z is concerned). An "idea" that combines both of these is to limit the speed via ESC, or Tx, to a max speed you can control...and, then, as throttle control gets better, gradually increase it, until you have removed all 'limiting'. If you start at, say, 60%, you could increase it to 65% after a few weeks...then 70% after a few more weeks, then 75% after a couple more weeks, and so forth. Before you know it, the ESC/Tx will be at 100%, and you will have the throttle control to use that motor on any size track. That's what I'm doing...and, so far, it's helping (I'm now 'crashing' far less than I'm 'driving'...lol).
AlvBo likes this.
Panther6834 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 06:47 AM
  #1705  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 788
From: Central NC, US
Default

Originally Posted by Panther6834
What about the Audi R8 (in comparison to/against the NSX)?
I think the NSX is more forgiving on the walls than the new Audi R8 body you referenced, but its what I run so I may be biased. I have several of the older R8 bodies that are great, but I haven't tried the newer one yet.
Traveler2 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 07:17 AM
  #1706  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 669
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Traveler2
I think the NSX is more forgiving on the walls than the new Audi R8 body you referenced, but its what I run so I may be biased. I have several of the older R8 bodies that are great, but I haven't tried the newer one yet.
"Old", or "new", shouldn't they be the same? I mean, the only differences should be the colors & graphics. I can't claim to actually know...but, I would assume they're made using the same molds, and the same plastic. Again, just my assumption.
Panther6834 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 08:15 AM
  #1707  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 788
From: Central NC, US
Default

Originally Posted by Panther6834
"Old", or "new", shouldn't they be the same? I mean, the only differences should be the colors & graphics. I can't claim to actually know...but, I would assume they're made using the same molds, and the same plastic. Again, just my assumption.
They are not, which is why I was drawing a distinction. The older one is wider and has a more rounded front so more forgiving on walls. I’d suggest finding a picture of both and comparing them, but we are getting off topic here. Your inquiry might be better off in the Kyosho Mini-Z Series thread where it might get more views and input.
Traveler2 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 08:42 AM
  #1708  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 669
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Traveler2
They are not, which is why I was drawing a distinction. The older one is wider and has a more rounded front so more forgiving on walls. I’d suggest finding a picture of both and comparing them, but we are getting off topic here. Your inquiry might be better off in the Kyosho Mini-Z Series thread where it might get more views and input.
No worries...was just curious about a comparison, especially as these (ie. my) cars will (sooner or later, hopefully sooner) be used for World Challenge. Although, technically, both bodies should probably be reserved to the AWD class, as both bodies are actually AWD cars. Whether for World Challenge, or local clubs, shouldn't RWD classes only allow RWD bodies, and AWD class only allow AWD bodies? Again, just curious.
Panther6834 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023 | 07:02 PM
  #1709  
danjoy25's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,203
Default

Class-4wd open
Date- March 2023
Location-Sydney
Race Time-4:54.564
Fastest Lap-3.708
Chassis-GL GLA
Body-GL Lambo
Wheelbase-98mm
Tires-Kyosho Radials tyres 30f/20r
Motor-3500kv
Batteries-GL lipo

danjoy25 is offline  
Old 03-31-2023 | 08:44 AM
  #1710  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 788
From: Central NC, US
Default March Bod Stock

Class-Box Stock
Date-3/10/23
Location-Winston-Salem, NC
Race Time-242.2
Fastest Lap-3.03
Chassis-MR-03 FHSS
Body-2012 NSX
Wheelbase-98mm
Tires-PN KS Med fronts, Marka V1R10 rears
Motor-Stock
Batteries-SpeedHouse 800s
Front Springs-Kyosho Orange
T-Plate-Kyosho FRP 6H
Motor Mount-Stock MM
Dampener (If applicable)-None
Dampener Fluid (If applicable)-K 15k grease on top shock
Gearing-Stock Gear Diff/7T pinion
Notes-No changes and 2.8 seconds faster than going clockwise last month. This car was just 1.5 seconds faster than my rebuilt Box Stock ASF car (cracked chassis) which I got a 243.6 with this month.




Last edited by Traveler2; 03-31-2023 at 09:52 AM.
Traveler2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.