Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree262Likes

Xray T4 18

    Hide Wikipost
Old 07-17-2018, 03:49 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Xray T4 18
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: R Dodge
Welcome to the XRAY T4'18 Thread & Wikipost! Here you will find some useful info, tips and tricks as well as setups that are used by several team drivers. This wikipost is a work in progress and should continue to develop over time. Feel free to add anything you feel is useful to the community!

New for 2018:
Similar to 2017, the T4'18 kit comes available in the U.S. with either a Graphite chassis (Part no. XRA300024), or Aluminum Flex chassis (Part no. XRA300024A) along with all of the great features introduced last year. We recommend the Graphite chassis for starting on asphalt, and the Aluminum Flex for starting on carpet. The big changes for 2018 are much lower center of gravity, courtesy of the Ultra Low Profile (ULP) shocks/towers and narrower weight distribution by shifting the motor in towards the center-line of the car. In moving the motor closer to the center, the topdeck and layshaft bulkheads have been re-designed. Also new this year, the motor mount includes more holes which extend further toward the rear of the car to improve traction. With the new shorter shocks, the 2018 will use the same springs as previous T4 models.

What's NEW at T4 2018? Convert your '17 to '18 specs with these parts:

- NEW chassis plate (3 options to chose from, Graphite, Aluminum, Alum. Flex)
- NEW topdeck
- NEW ULP shocks (4mm shorter than 2017)
- NEW ULP shock towers (4mm shorter than 2017)
- NEW Motor mount (1mm narrower than 2017)
- NEW Motor mount plate
- NEW layshaft bulkheads
- NEW 51mm ECS ES driveshafts

301145 T4'18 CHASSIS 2.2MM GRAPHITE
301199 T4'18 UPPER DECK 2.0MM GRAPHITE
302084 ULP SHOCK TOWER FRONT 3.0MM GRAPHITE
303001-O T4'18 ALU LAYSHAFT BULKHEAD RIGHT - ORANGE
303002-O T4'18 ALU MOTOR MOUNT - ORANGE
303003-O T4'18 ALU MOTOR MOUNT PLATE - ORANGE
303085 ULP SHOCK TOWER REAR 3.0MM GRAPHITE
305221 ECS (ES) DRIVE SHAFT 51MM FOR 2MM PIN - HUDY SPRING STEEL(tm) (1)
305334 ECS ES (EXTRA STRONG) DRIVE SHAFT 51MM - HUDY SPRING STEEL(tm) - SET
308043-O ULP ALU SHOCK ADJUSTABLE NUT - ORANGE (2)
308308-O ULP ALU SHOCK ABSORBER-SET - ORANGE (2)
308324 ULP ALU SHOCK BODY (2)
308334 ULP COMPOSITE SHOCK PARTS
308354-O ULP ALU SHOCK CAP-NUT WITH VENT HOLE - ORANGE (2)

Tips & Tricks:

Alex Hagberg's Tech Tip Tuesday articles

How to mount your Protoform LTC-R Body
Setting static camber
How to mount weight on your chassis Part1
How to mount the rear wing on Protoform bodies
Simple troubleshooting guide
How to mount the battery on your chassis
How to glue your front tires for CRC Black carpet with Eric Anderson
Mastering the Sanwa M12S: Utilizing Exponential and RMode
How to mount weight on your chassis Part2
Mastering the Sanwa M12S: Utilizing TH-Hold

ULP Shock:

Building the new ULP Shock w/ Zero Rebound by Dominic Quek

Team driver Tim Wahl posted some very useful build tips for the T4'16 on Facebook as he worked through building a new kit. These tips will still apply on the current model.

1- Carbon Parts
2-Suspension
3-Solid Axle and Differential
4-Bulkheads & Drivetrain
5-Driveshaft (ECS & CVD)
6-Front & Rear Suspension
7-Tweak
8-Anti-Roll Bar
9-Battery Fix (OPTIONAL)
10-Bumper & Body
11-Shocks
12-Steering

Center Brace:
The manual indicates using a 2mm shim under the center brace when attaching to the chassis plate. The gap is actually 3mm, so a 3mm shim should be used here.

Tuning Note:
On Carpet we have found that adding screws or doubling up the graphite brace will make the car react quicker to steering input, & change direction faster. Raising the graphite brace off of the aluminum bulkheads by placing a shim under it on the front and rear holes will reduce response. Using the tie-rod will reduce initial response to input, but will generate more in-corner traction or 'side-bite'. Using no brace will generate even more of this 'side-bite' but all of this is at the expense of corner speed. Best to use the tie-rod or no brace only in low-traction conditions. Additionally, the center brace increases forward traction, so removing it will potentially increase wheel-spin out of low speed corners.

New Graphite Hubs:
Xray have recently released some additional Graphite hubs for the T4 lineup. The 4° Graphite C-Hub has been out for some time and is known to improve steering on entry, and in general makes the car turn better. This has been the go-to c-hub on asphalt for many on the Xray team, though it is not needed on high bite carpet. The Graphite rear hub tends to make the car more stable, especially on corner entry. We are still working on gathering input on the new Graphite steering block, but for the moment feel that it should improve steering response. All Graphite parts are approximately 1g lighter than the Hard or Medium options.

ARS Tuning courtesy of Ed (TryHard):
If you set the ARS up with no shims under either inside or outside ball positions, it actually adds toe-in under compression, at around 1° at 5.2mm ride height (how much it adds depends how much the car compresses, obviously )

Adding shims reduces the amount added (1mm under one of the links gives about 0.5°), until the link has 2mm worth of shims (1mm either side, or 2mm on one side) makes the ARS neutral. Adding more shims then turns it into reducing toe in under compression.

Whilst that might sound a bit backwards, it's actually not quite as simple as it sounds. By having the links to add toe, you gain forward traction. Also consider as the car rolls, the inside wheel is in negative compression, and the outside in compression. So the inside is toe-ing out, and the outside toe-ing in, so the whole rear is then 'steering' in the direction of the turn. Obviously the inside wheel has a lot less influence than the outside as it's far less loaded, but the effect is still there.

Optional & Tuning Parts to consider:

XRA301146 T4'18 ALU CHASSIS 2.0MM - SWISS 7075 T6 **For very high traction** (Approx. 108g)
XRA301147 T4'18 ALU FLEX CHASSIS 2.0MM - SWISS 7075 T6 **For high traction** (Approx. 93g)
XRA301169 T4'18 UPPER DECK 1.6MM GRAPHITE
XRA302254 Composite Steering Block - Graphite
XRA302334 Aluminum C-Hub Block - Caster
0° - Orange **Only for ARS**
XRA302383 Composite C-Hub Right – 4
° - Graphite (ECS) **Not recommended for high traction**
XRA302384 Composite C-Hub Left – 4
° - Graphite (ECS) **Not recommended for high traction**
XRA302711 Brass Front Lower 1-Piece Suspension Holder - Front - FF
XRA302803 1.3mm Front Anti-Roll Bar

XRA303360 Composite Upright 0° Outboard Toe-In - Graphite
XRA303802 1.2mm Rear Anti-Roll Bar

XRA305137 Steel Solid Axle Driveshaft Adapters - HUDY Spring Steel **Highly recommend**
XRA305242 Composite Drive Shaft Replacement Cap 3.5mm – Orange – Strong (QTY 4)

XRA305351 Aluminum Wheel Hub – Offset “-0.75mm” – Black (QTY 2)
XRA305352 Aluminum Wheel Hub - Offset
“+0.75mm” - Black (QTY 2)
XRA306191 T4 Graphite + Aluminum Fully Adjustable Battery Holder
XRA308029 ULP ALU PROGRESSIVE SHOCK SYSTEM - SET (2) **Only for asphalt**
XRA308264 4S Spring-Set Progressive C=2.5-2.8 (QTY 2)

XRA308276 4S Spring-Set C=2.7 (QTY 2)
XRA308286 4S Spring-Set C=2.6 (QTY 2)

Recent Setups:
7-Oct - Alexander Hagberg - IIC - High Traction Carpet - Mod Q2, P2
7-Oct - Craig Xavier - IIC - High Traction Carpet - SuperStock Q5, P5

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2018, 03:41 AM
  #556  
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,952
Default

Originally Posted by Dual Fuel
NUH... SORRY ED. doesn't work. At least not for me.

I tried your advice today and the 18 was even worse.

Car was bloody horrible. 350 oil and shafts at 8.5mm gap as suggested
So was the car crap only because the ball joints were binding?
If, so that's not a real comparison.
Ed has also mentioned he's using PSS, so it won't necessarily have the same effect on standard pistons.
Skiddins is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 03:44 AM
  #557  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,724
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TryHard
unless you cut down your shock shafts....
Quite shocked Xray didn’t bring out a shorter version with the ULPs to be honest.

Have shafted us a little with that one.
cplus is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 04:10 PM
  #558  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins
So was the car crap only because the ball joints were binding?

If, so that's not a real comparison.
Ed has also mentioned he's using PSS, so it won't necessarily have the same effect on standard pistons.
Granted.. The point I am trying to make was shortening the gap WITHOUT shortening the actual shaft did not work

Fact is after quite a bit of testing we simply can not get the 18 to go as fast on low traction asphalt with the standard ULP shock package compared to the 17!

Going by what Ed has said modifications are required to shorten the shock shafts by physically cutting them.

The whole idea of a new model is that it should be superior to the old one.

Now don"t get me wrong... I love this car... but with the 17 shocks and towers fitted.
I ALSO accept this appears to be only a problem on low-mid traction asphalt.

On a car this expensive we should not need to be modifying shock shafts or be faced with purchasing expensive option parts ( PSS ) to make them perform.

Having said that I will get the Dremel out and shorten the shafts and try again.
Bar likes this.

Last edited by Dual Fuel; 01-17-2018 at 04:21 PM.
Dual Fuel is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 04:16 PM
  #559  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
mschumi101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wisconsin - Madison
Posts: 920
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dual Fuel
My point was shortening the gap WITHOUT shortening the actual shaft did not work

Fact is after quite a bit of testing we simply can not get the 18 to go as fast on low traction asphalt with the standard ULP shock package compared to the 17!

Going by what Ed has said modifications are required to shorten the shock shafts by physically cutting them.

The whole idea of a new model is that it should be superior to the old one.

Now don"t get me wrong... I love this car... but with the 17 shocks and towers fitted.
I ALSO accept this appears to be only a problem on low-mid traction asphalt.

On a car this expensive we should not need to be modifying shock shafts or be faced with purchasing expensive option parts ( PSS ) to make them perform.

Having said that I will get the Dremel out and shorten the shafts and try again.
Pardon my ignorance with the '18 shocks, I only have the '17 car... But couldn't you achieve a similar gap with limiters inside the shock? Or do you still need the full piston down travel with the smaller shocks?
mschumi101 is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 04:26 PM
  #560  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by daleburr
I've clarified my post. Most of the top guys are running 0.5 low and wide on FF and FR. So lower roll-centre and wider track than kit.

It seems to give more steering without making the car edgy (so more corner speed). Have a look at any setup from Olly Jefferies or Zak Finlay and they'll probably be this way.
Thanks for this clarification.

Where may I find said setup sheets from the above drivers for Asphalt racing. They do not appear to be on the Xray site.

Main reason I ask is I would like to know if they r running front pins low and wide whilst running narrow front hex's or std.

thanks again..
Dual Fuel is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 05:03 PM
  #561  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
tbrymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,556
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dual Fuel
Thanks for this clarification.

Where may I find said setup sheets from the above drivers for Asphalt racing. They do not appear to be on the Xray site.

Main reason I ask is I would like to know if they r running front pins low and wide whilst running narrow front hex's or std.

thanks again..
Most guys on our high traction smooth asphalt track are using narrow front hexes with anti-dive and sweep in front.
tbrymer is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 05:27 PM
  #562  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,387
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mschumi101
Pardon my ignorance with the '18 shocks, I only have the '17 car... But couldn't you achieve a similar gap with limiters inside the shock? Or do you still need the full piston down travel with the smaller shocks?
Your second comment, as your trying to get the piston lower in the body. Basically making the distance between the piston and ball joint smaller... but that's a bit hard to measure
TryHard is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 05:32 PM
  #563  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,387
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dual Fuel
Thanks for this clarification.

Where may I find said setup sheets from the above drivers for Asphalt racing. They do not appear to be on the Xray site.

Main reason I ask is I would like to know if they r running front pins low and wide whilst running narrow front hex's or std.

thanks again..
This is Alex's latest technical Asphalt setup. It's one i used as a base for last weekends race, where the car was very good.
http://site.petitrc.com/reglages/xra...vante20171112/

Only changes I made were;
Narrow hexes all round
400 oil in shocks (still with PSS/8.5mm gap)
5K diff
Droop at 5.4 F, 4.4R

Worked very well for mod in medium grip asphalt, with a few bumps. But for lower traction, it lacks rear grip, so am going to be working on that this week (probably back to 3° rear toe, softer rear bar, and put the motor mount flex screw fully forward to start with)
TryHard is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 06:59 PM
  #564  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Nuno Gancho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 426
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

What makes the 18 faster with 17 tower and shocks beside the main chassi, is 18 motor mount same as the 17 beside the extra holes plate thanks
Nuno Gancho is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 11:24 PM
  #565  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by Nuno Gancho
What makes the 18 faster with 17 tower and shocks beside the main chassi, is 18 motor mount same as the 17 beside the extra holes plate thanks
https://teamxray.com/t4/2018/en/#2
Dual Fuel is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 08:04 AM
  #566  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 406
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Pardon my ignorance, but I see folks talking about narrow hexes on the car.

Where, exactly, is this setting?
JoshuaRC10 is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 08:11 AM
  #567  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
erchn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 850
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

https://www.amainhobbies.com/xray-14...365351/p247407

It’s a method of narrowing the track width at the wheel.
JoshuaRC10 likes this.
erchn is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 08:12 AM
  #568  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
DirkW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,618
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JoshuaRC10
Pardon my ignorance, but I see folks talking about narrow hexes on the car.

Where, exactly, is this setting?
The wheel hexes on the axles... that hold and drive the rims. They are available in different widths.
JoshuaRC10 likes this.
DirkW is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 08:14 AM
  #569  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 406
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DirkW
The wheel hexes on the axles... that hold and drive the rims. They are available in different widths.
Ah jeez.

I guess I didn't know them by that name.

Thanks!
JoshuaRC10 is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 04:35 PM
  #570  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,724
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JoshuaRC10
I guess I didn't know them by that name.
What did you call them? Not teasing, genuinely interested!
JoshuaRC10 likes this.
cplus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.