Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
World GT-R Rules and Discussion >

World GT-R Rules and Discussion

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree829Likes

World GT-R Rules and Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2017, 01:28 AM
  #1231  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
G-rem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 785
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JimBo1008
The Nissan GTR shell is 195mm and the chassis is 200mm.
Looks nice, rear wheels don't seem to protrude to much from the body! I am thinking of doing something similar but either with JConcept LMP body or WRC LMP body. The main problem is the fact these bodies are 190mm wide only, I guess a bit too narrow for the rear width of a 200mm pan car with CRC rubber tires
G-rem is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 02:30 PM
  #1232  
Tech Master
iTrader: (72)
 
kmas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: tri city mich
Posts: 1,964
Trader Rating: 72 (100%+)
Default

What is a good servo for my crc wgtr car? I need a smooth option
kmas is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 04:16 PM
  #1233  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kmas
What is a good servo for my crc wgtr car? I need a smooth option
Best to go over to the CRC WGT-R string to see past conversations about servos.

Otherwise, I love the KO Propo RSx 12 servo and JR3650 servos I am using on my two cars. They center well and are very smooth.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 08:05 PM
  #1234  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Neja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 605
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I just got my first set of WGT- R tires. WHY did they make them such a BIG DIAMETER?? The front tires are HUGE!! The rears are like non-cut down foams--but they should be 1/4" smaller diameter front and the rears could be smaller too!! I've had to add big spacers under the front end to drop the ride height!! Geez, WHY???? It should be EZ to convert from foam to rubber--and bodies will be a problem to fit as well. WHY didn't CRC make the right diameter tires??
Tim Neja is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 09:50 PM
  #1235  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tim Neja
I just got my first set of WGT- R tires. WHY did they make them such a BIG DIAMETER?? The front tires are HUGE!! The rears are like non-cut down foams--but they should be 1/4" smaller diameter front and the rears could be smaller too!! I've had to add big spacers under the front end to drop the ride height!! Geez, WHY???? It should be EZ to convert from foam to rubber--and bodies will be a problem to fit as well. WHY didn't CRC make the right diameter tires??
Tim,

CRC did make properly sized tires for WGT-R. And the WGT-R bodies are different from the WGT bodies to accommodate the larger tires.

Looks like you need to do some research into the differences between WGT and WGT-R. I suggest that you thoroughly read the two threads about WGT-R in the Electric On-Road forums to understand the tire and body sizing issues related to converting a WGT over to a WGT-R car. I initially did the conversion of my first CRC WGT car and it went pretty smoothly...after I read Dumper's helpful posts about going that route.

Are you planning to use it for WGT-R on the carpet at TQ in Chino? Used to occasionally run WGT there; but, didn't know that they were running WGT-R these days.

You can PM me if you need help with your car conversion.

Welcome to WGT-R.

Bill
NutDriver likes this.

Last edited by Still Bill; 12-04-2017 at 10:14 PM.
Still Bill is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 06:27 AM
  #1236  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 914
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tim Neja
I just got my first set of WGT- R tires. WHY did they make them such a BIG DIAMETER?? The front tires are HUGE!! The rears are like non-cut down foams--but they should be 1/4" smaller diameter front and the rears could be smaller too!! I've had to add big spacers under the front end to drop the ride height!! Geez, WHY???? It should be EZ to convert from foam to rubber--and bodies will be a problem to fit as well. WHY didn't CRC make the right diameter tires??
Pssst... they're F1 tires.
el salvador likes this.
Serzoni is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 09:10 AM
  #1237  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
YoDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gilroy, Ca.
Posts: 2,002
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Funny how someone decides to join a class that’s more than 3 years old and comes to the revalation that the architects of said class and tires messed up. 🙄
YoDog is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 09:38 AM
  #1238  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Prudenville Mi.
Posts: 1,503
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default Tires

I agree that it would be nice to have smaller tires but it is what it is. Now that I've run the class for a while I don't have any problem with the larger tires and they seem to last forever.
theflyingrc likes this.
hobbyten is online now  
Old 12-05-2017, 07:59 PM
  #1239  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Neja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 605
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Thanks for the explanation Bill, but it still makes NO sense!!! Going to rubber tires should NOT REQUIRE a HUGE change in the WGT cars?? WHY?? What does it accomplish other than making it HARD on the guys that ran WGT to convert to rubber? Seems we don't have that large a participation in RC on road that making it a PIA for another class makes sense??? I'm okay with rubber tires if people want them--but it could have been a LOT smoother change for a fun class instead of painful!!
Tim Neja is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 08:13 PM
  #1240  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,041
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

What huge change. On the older CRC SE car you added 8 2-3mm spacers in the front and rear.Put on the tires and a ton of bodies at one time to chose from (when HPI was making bodies). We still have more bodies to chose from than with WGT. It is a fun class for many of us racer here in Florida. No more ride height adjustments and no tire truing and the tires last longer.
hobbyten and Tim Neja like this.
BullFrog is offline  
Old 12-06-2017, 09:19 AM
  #1241  
Tech Regular
 
MarkBurgess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, United Kingdom
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by BullFrog
What huge change. On the older CRC SE car you added 8 2-3mm spacers in the front and rear.Put on the tires and a ton of bodies at one time to chose from (when HPI was making bodies). We still have more bodies to chose from than with WGT. It is a fun class for many of us racer here in Florida. No more ride height adjustments and no tire truing and the tires last longer.
Those simple changes are all I've done to my SE to run rubber tyres

The rubber rules use tired and tested rubber compounds that grip and wear well. Plus they never get close to any gluing problem. All in all they are the best tyre for my favourite class, and hats off to those that set the rules and chose them

Anything as small as thin foams would be a new size and design of tyre. I could speculate on how they might grip and wear, and that a new design would push up costs.

Let's enjoy what we have for a great class. And let's race!
hobbyten likes this.
MarkBurgess is offline  
Old 12-06-2017, 10:14 AM
  #1242  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (102)
 
1/8 IC Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 6,509
Trader Rating: 102 (100%+)
Default

just curious who is running the original WGT-R chassis, the F103GT?
1/8 IC Fan is offline  
Old 12-06-2017, 10:21 AM
  #1243  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
YoDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gilroy, Ca.
Posts: 2,002
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tim Neja
Thanks for the explanation Bill, but it still makes NO sense!!! Going to rubber tires should NOT REQUIRE a HUGE change in the WGT cars?? WHY?? What does it accomplish other than making it HARD on the guys that ran WGT to convert to rubber? Seems we don't have that large a participation in RC on road that making it a PIA for another class makes sense??? I'm okay with rubber tires if people want them--but it could have been a LOT smoother change for a fun class instead of painful!!
WGT had died in most of the country. The rubber tires were already in production for F1 so it made sense to design a new rim that made it possible to use these tires in another class and raise the production volume. The rubber tires as they are, resurrected the class albeit different. If you want to keep running WGT, go right ahead... nobody is stopping you. Something that you may not be aware of is that you can mount up your own set with the tires reversed which will give you a lower looking sidewall on the outer side of the rim. They look awesome but not sure of any performance gain. One benefit is that the sidewall won't grip the barriers as much which could save on steering knuckles.
99.9% of people running WGT-R are happy to be able to use an existing chassis and keep their investment alive.
Keep in mind that WGT-R didn't kill WGT, it was already dead. If you can still get guys in your area to run foam then great! I'd run both classes since I love pan cars and have 3 200mm GT chassis to choose from.
davidl likes this.
YoDog is offline  
Old 12-06-2017, 10:21 AM
  #1244  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Neja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 605
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MarkBurgess
Those simple changes are all I've done to my SE to run rubber tyres

The rubber rules use tired and tested rubber compounds that grip and wear well. Plus they never get close to any gluing problem. All in all they are the best tyre for my favourite class, and hats off to those that set the rules and chose them

Anything as small as thin foams would be a new size and design of tyre. I could speculate on how they might grip and wear, and that a new design would push up costs.

Let's enjoy what we have for a great class. And let's race!
Ok--using an existing tire makes sense. So these are the F-1 tires then? They are narrower than the old foams in the rear. I'll be testing this Friday with them. I'm looking forward to a fun class-- I hope we can get it going here in SoCal.
Tim Neja is offline  
Old 12-06-2017, 01:32 PM
  #1245  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 237
Default

The only real change required is raising the suspension and motor plates so you can get ride height. For the pod, I simply run another pod plate cut down as a spacer and in the front, just run more spacers. It would be nice to have a low profile rubber tire that had grip like foam, but the existing Crc tires work fine and last a long time.
davidl and hobbyten like this.
slotracer577 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.