R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Electric On-Road (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-road-2/)
-   -   Tamiya TRF419 (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-road/831585-tamiya-trf419.html)

d16dcoe45 10-09-2014 04:56 AM


Originally Posted by robk (Post 13582933)
What you are talking about is making sedan even more like 1/8 on road which of course is the path to popularity.:rolleyes:

Btw the reason you dont see sedans designed around short packs or any mod cars with short packs is that they dont provide the power(not referring to capacity) that bigger packs do. In offroad the load is not the same. To prove my point, dirt oval racers (on high bite tracks with foam tires) who tried the short packs in *17.5* went back to full sized packs.

As far as a center diff, i'm not sure if its legal. Slipper clutches were outlawed early on for sure, and I'm not sure if a 3rd diff is allowed.

I 'd love on road to be more popular but that wasn't the reason for my suggestions--just a better car.

17.5 on road is a different animal and the only way to achieve parity (with the smaller packs) would be ONLY shortys or don't even bother. But in Mod? Couldn't you just run a hotter wind/more boost or is it not that simple?

Why aren't slippers or 3 diffs allowed in a TC? Any actual sound reasoning or some old weirdo rule? Not that I see the point of a slipper in a TC just the idea that it is "illegal" for whatever reason.

sosidge 10-09-2014 05:44 AM

You're fighting the wrong battle.

The rules for the class have developed over time and have derived from a number of influences. Most of which are in the interests of keeping the class healthy, competitive and cost effective.

They are not in place to restrict development - instead they define what the class is.

If you start changing the dimensions, the drivetrain and the bodyshells - you aren't running a touring car any more. There is ample scope for innovation in a touring car - the Awesomatix is more or less the complete opposite of a conventional belt-drive touring car and it is completely legal.

It is just that the market is very mature now and most of the manufacturers are very conservative. I started touring car racing in 2001 and every new release was packed full of new ideas. Sadly that is not the case any more.

goin2drt 10-09-2014 06:54 AM

So let's get her back on track.

Does anyone have a release date yet?

Qatmix 10-09-2014 08:56 AM

Sorta TRF419 related,

I managed to catch up with Jilles Groskamp just before he set off to race in this years worlds, here is a link to the interview :)

http://www.thercracer.com/2014/10/ra...-groskamp.html

as to the release date, I was told late November.

Minami 10-09-2014 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by d16dcoe45 (Post 13582803)
The innovation is the fact of the recent use of machined alloy chassis, very aggressive cab forward bodies, mid motor & even center motor 2wd buggies--3 diffs for 4wd off road & designing cars AROUND current lipo technology--not designing cars around old style brick packs.

Why no center diff for 1/10 electric TC? It can give the corner speed advantage of a one-way without the negative effects (ie loss of front brakes) of a one way.

The aluminum chassis only came to on road (talking about electric) after it was tried and worked quite well in off road.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:


Those are not new to on-road (center 1-ways and mid-motor config, for example), but they eventually died out of use for a reason. All these companies spend a lot on research and dev't, with proper racers and engineers to come up with solutions, and you'd think they're not even trying? :lol:

On-road and Off-road have differing sets of requirements, so saying "this-and-that is absent in on-road, while it is there in off-road, therefore on-road is on a stand still in development" is a bit misconstrued or lacking in development.

Anyway, all of these (on and off road) are built with function first in mind. If something is needed to be fast, it will be there. If not, it will be changed and/or improved.

Raman 10-09-2014 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by Minami (Post 13584849)
:lol::lol::lol::lol:


Those are not new to on-road (center 1-ways and mid-motor config, for example), but they eventually died out of use for a reason. All these companies spend a lot on research and dev't, with proper racers and engineers to come up with solutions, and you'd think they're not even trying? :lol:

On-road and Off-road have differing sets of requirements, so saying "this-and-that is absent in on-road, while it is there in off-road, therefore on-road is on a stand still in development" is a bit misconstrued or lacking in development.

Anyway, all of these (on and off road) are built with function first in mind. If something is needed to be fast, it will be there. If not, it will be changed and/or improved.

+1 take a look at the GT8 class where they convert Buggys to onroad. The brushless versions end up removing the centre diff and replacing it with a spool, or locking the centre diff. You don't need a centre diff on asphalt.

As for Aluminium chassis. All end users are looking for the next new advance and companies are looking to make some new $. Unfortunately, not all new ideas are better. While In the off-road world an aluminium is a better choice than carbon.. It's more durable and won't be compromised by nicks. However in the onroad world, it's just another gimmick to make new sales or sell an additional hop up chassis. With carbon you can weave flex into different parts of the chassis. You can try that with aluminium, I suppose by thinning / milling out the section, but it won't be as fluid as carbon because your removing material to achieve this, whereas with carbon your building the weave into the chassis.

niznai 10-09-2014 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by Raman (Post 13584879)

[...]

As for Aluminium chassis.

[...]

Ha. You said "Aluminium".

Matthew_Armeni 10-09-2014 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by robk (Post 13582933)
As far as a center diff, i'm not sure if its legal. Slipper clutches were outlawed early on for sure, and I'm not sure if a 3rd diff is allowed.

I can't find any IFMAR or ROAR rule outlawing slippers or center diffs. The only drivetrain things I found were that ROAR requires 4WD, IFMAR say 4WD or 2WD (front or rear, both are ok), and IFMAR says you cannot run a one-way bearing in the rear for front wheel braking only, the rear must be able to have braking effect from the ESC it says. That last one is interesting, I guess a FWD car is an exception for that, unless you were to run a one-way in the rear but installed it backwards.

Raman 10-09-2014 11:57 AM


Originally Posted by niznai (Post 13584919)
Ha. You said "Aluminium".

Well I did learn English in good ole United Kingdom :)

niznai 10-09-2014 07:08 PM


Originally Posted by Raman (Post 13584967)
Well I did learn English in good ole United Kingdom :)

Dang imperialists.

TB03Racer09 10-09-2014 11:13 PM

Looks like its between Tamiya and Yokomo for the worlds, the Yokomo being slightly ahead. The Tamiya drivers seem happy with the TRF419 in open practice.

Just wondering, when does Tamiya release a worlds edition kit after winning the worlds? Do they release both the standard 419 and the worlds or just one or the other?

cplus 10-10-2014 01:05 AM


Originally Posted by TB03Racer09 (Post 13586107)
Looks like its between Tamiya and Yokomo for the worlds, the Yokomo being slightly ahead. The Tamiya drivers seem happy with the TRF419 in open practice.

today we will know more. the rankings are all on three lap pace and not many were doing full 5 min runs. most guys were mixing up their chassis to see which one they prefered - some even mixed during the heats.


Originally Posted by TB03Racer09 (Post 13586107)
Just wondering, when does Tamiya release a worlds edition kit after winning the worlds? Do they release both the standard 419 and the worlds or just one or the other?

Bit hard to say what they will do.

in recent times they have released the "new" car in a non worlds year (as was the 418) and then the update iteration afterwards.

I think if they win, we will see the "standard" 419 plus a limited worlds edition that includes some bonus parts or similar.

cplus 10-10-2014 03:20 PM

So looks like I was right on the pulleys :D

More teeth, bigger housing, more oil, tougher gears. Nice. Oh, and black too - which is actually a negative I think, I like being able to see when there is crud in my pulley so I can clean it out!!

"Jilles mentioned that the pulleys are larger than those on the 418, which makes the car accelerate more smoothly and feels like it has more traction, and both will be black as the plastic doesn’t show dirt as much as the white plastic on the prototype pulley seen here."

High chance 39t too. No need for a new injection moulding die that way as they can just take the front from the TA06. Save a bit of coin, why not!

niznai 10-10-2014 11:40 PM


Originally Posted by cplus (Post 13587178)
So looks like I was right on the pulleys :D

More teeth, bigger housing, more oil, tougher gears. Nice. Oh, and black too - which is actually a negative I think, I like being able to see when there is crud in my pulley so I can clean it out!!

"Jilles mentioned that the pulleys are larger than those on the 418, which makes the car accelerate more smoothly and feels like it has more traction, and both will be black as the plastic doesn’t show dirt as much as the white plastic on the prototype pulley seen here."

High chance 39t too. No need for a new injection moulding die that way as they can just take the front from the TA06. Save a bit of coin, why not!

I am not sure about that. The gear housing half looks different on the outside.

And it's not going to make life easy for stock classes, with the new internal ratio. Hopefully will move to a higher tooth count for the center pulleys (don't hold your breath).

cplus 10-11-2014 12:57 AM


Originally Posted by niznai (Post 13587755)
I am not sure about that. The gear housing half looks different on the outside.

I'm referring to the 39t spool pulley that is available for the TA06. The diff is all new for sure. The 503/06 one takes the same gears as the previous diff and has the same oil volume.


Originally Posted by niznai (Post 13587755)
And it's not going to make life easy for stock classes, with the new internal ratio. Hopefully will move to a higher tooth count for the center pulleys (don't hold your breath).

This new diff is different internal ratio (inside the diff) but this won't effect the FDR - the larger pulley on the diff/spool will though. It's just the relative size of the small/large bevel gears inside. This will effect the diff action, not the drive. They might just be the gears from the Evo6? The old diff is 20:12 the Evo6 is 18:10.

If the diff/spool pulleys are 39t and they keep the 20t centres, it will be 1.95 - pretty much back to what the 417 was with 37:19 (1.947)


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:37 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.