Team Corally RDX Touring Car
#2221
alright thanks,
lazy
lazy
#2222
Originally Posted by Cookie
I just got the motor/battery case and it's very trick, well worth while!
It holds 6 batteries, 4 motors and two armatures, plus it has a small plastic container built in for brushes/springs/washers etc
Awesome!
It holds 6 batteries, 4 motors and two armatures, plus it has a small plastic container built in for brushes/springs/washers etc
Awesome!
#2224
Are they Corally springs on Toso's car?
#2225
Tech Master
iTrader: (42)
Originally Quoted by danjoy25
http://rctech.net/forum/attachment....achmentid=72003
Are they Corally springs on Toso's car?
http://rctech.net/forum/attachment....achmentid=72003
Are they Corally springs on Toso's car?
Keith
#2226
The rear ones are HPI, but the front are Corally. Don't hold your breath, those guys are trying all sorts of spring combos.
#2228
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
RDX vs. Assassin Suspenion Design? are they that different? or identical??????
hello all.....
I wanted to know if there is a huge difference or if any,
the suspension design on the RDX is same as the Assassin????
I had the Assassin last year and got rid of it.....
I know the drivetrain is different, but what about the
suspension geometry/design????? they appear to look
exactly the same........
please provide input......thank you
I wanted to know if there is a huge difference or if any,
the suspension design on the RDX is same as the Assassin????
I had the Assassin last year and got rid of it.....
I know the drivetrain is different, but what about the
suspension geometry/design????? they appear to look
exactly the same........
please provide input......thank you
#2230
The RDX has larger pulleys and there for has a more effecient drivetrain. More belt wrap around the pulleys.
#2232
Tech Rookie
The Rear Dif in the RDX is verry light, compered to the assassin But I think the assassin drirect drive is verry effiecient. Because you only have one belt. But the rdx drives so much better, and is verry easy to handle.
#2233
Originally Posted by rclab1
doesn't that mean more friction? since the pulleys' are bigger and more belt is wrapped around it?????
Plus with larger pulley's, the belt does not have as sharp of a bend as if the pulley's were smaller in diameter.
The question I have is are the pulley's smaller on the Assassign? I never had one so i don't know. But I can see the direct drive Assissagn being slightly more effecient than the RDX because of the single belt. I just don't think the weight distribution with the motor so far back was too good.
#2234
Originally Posted by rclab1
also, it seems that the Assassins' Direct Drive set up would be a lot more efficient than the RDX's Drive Train.....
since the belt has LESS gears to go through????
.....if i'm wrong, please explain.....
since the belt has LESS gears to go through????
.....if i'm wrong, please explain.....
But the major difference is that the RDX's handling is better and easier to drive (consistent that is) at a lot of tracks, as opposed to the Assassins DD design with its motor at the left rear which CAN (doesn't have to) create a car which is slightly harder to drive.
So If you've to make an easily made mistake it's efficincy just can't bring you the result you need.
Wel just keep in mind that all depends on the track, setup and the quality of a driver.
Especially for mod the RDX is AWESOME.
For spec or stock it depends, the fastest lap would probably go to the Assassin DD, but if the overall result would....