Tamiya TRF417
#5581
Timing wise, not much. In fact, I am finding myself tuning it to match its old characteristics.
It's more of quicker direction change, better stability, lower CG sort of chicane advantages. But seems to be lacking a sort of quick, on-the-edge feel we usually expects from a TRF. Win some, lose some. This guy behaves like a Xray T4.
Up to perspectives if that is good or bad.
It's more of quicker direction change, better stability, lower CG sort of chicane advantages. But seems to be lacking a sort of quick, on-the-edge feel we usually expects from a TRF. Win some, lose some. This guy behaves like a Xray T4.
Up to perspectives if that is good or bad.
#5582
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
I just today picked up a Tamiya 416. I do not know which version but it still has NIMH cutouts for the battery. My question is this: will a 417 chassis plate bolt on to the 416 to make a lipo car or are they completely different?
Thank you very much for an answer a I can get a 417 chassis plate very reasonable.
Thank you very much for an answer a I can get a 417 chassis plate very reasonable.
#5583
Tech Master
You can't fit a 417 chassis on the 416 although exotech do a nice replacement chassis if you want one without nimh cut-outs.
#5585
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
Hi guys,
Assuming that based on a "standard" setup (417X), at the track the car has a bit of oversteer on corner exit forcing you to be very carefull when applying the throttle for the next section of the track.
Any suggestion on setup change (to stop the pendulum effect)? And why would you suggest that change?
Tx a lot in advance for your thought!
Assuming that based on a "standard" setup (417X), at the track the car has a bit of oversteer on corner exit forcing you to be very carefull when applying the throttle for the next section of the track.
Any suggestion on setup change (to stop the pendulum effect)? And why would you suggest that change?
Tx a lot in advance for your thought!
#5586
Hi guys,
Assuming that based on a "standard" setup (417X), at the track the car has a bit of oversteer on corner exit forcing you to be very carefull when applying the throttle for the next section of the track.
Any suggestion on setup change (to stop the pendulum effect)? And why would you suggest that change?
Tx a lot in advance for your thought!
Assuming that based on a "standard" setup (417X), at the track the car has a bit of oversteer on corner exit forcing you to be very carefull when applying the throttle for the next section of the track.
Any suggestion on setup change (to stop the pendulum effect)? And why would you suggest that change?
Tx a lot in advance for your thought!
I think it reduces the weight transfer at front.
#5589
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
NItrox416,
Tx a lot for the suggestion.
The track is indeed small, http://prorc.ae/videos/
Decreasing the track width using B blocks at the front will increase steering at the front.
At the moment I'm using C-and C-separate already.
Reducing weight transfer is a good idea.
Will play with the droop.
Tx a lot for the suggestion.
The track is indeed small, http://prorc.ae/videos/
Decreasing the track width using B blocks at the front will increase steering at the front.
At the moment I'm using C-and C-separate already.
Reducing weight transfer is a good idea.
Will play with the droop.
#5590
Hi, using the v5 aeration shocks. setting the rebound to 0 is easy but if i test the rebound a few days later the rebound is all over the place. Is anyone else finding this?
#5591
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
Overtime, very shortly in fact, the shocks will have more air than what you started with, so more pressure builds in the shock the longer you use them, which is why you have to bleed them after each run.
The aeration shocks are supposed to be pretty good for asphalt, but again, they need to be bleed every run and rebuilt every few runs atleast to keep them consistent. Team TRF drivers were rebuilding the shocks after every run. I believe now they use the regular TRF Works shocks, as do most everyone else does as well.
#5592
NItrox416,
Tx a lot for the suggestion.
The track is indeed small, http://prorc.ae/videos/
Decreasing the track width using B blocks at the front will increase steering at the front.
At the moment I'm using C-and C-separate already.
Reducing weight transfer is a good idea.
Will play with the droop.
Tx a lot for the suggestion.
The track is indeed small, http://prorc.ae/videos/
Decreasing the track width using B blocks at the front will increase steering at the front.
At the moment I'm using C-and C-separate already.
Reducing weight transfer is a good idea.
Will play with the droop.
However I think is not your case, because my track is really tight, In which part of the track you're having problem?
Which motor are you using?
#5593
Thanks autocratic for your detailed reply! I wasn't aware they had to be bleed so many times. Gives me something else to do between runs
#5594
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
I have the TRF Works bladder shocks which are much nicer and obviously easier to deal with. There still is maintenance involved but you can run a whole day of racing without the shocks changing at all.
The aeration shocks are nice, but they don't seal as good as they need to.
#5595
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Yep. Doesn't take long, but just another thing to add to the list of checks for touring cars.
I have the TRF Works bladder shocks which are much nicer and obviously easier to deal with. There still is maintenance involved but you can run a whole day of racing without the shocks changing at all.
The aeration shocks are nice, but they don't seal as good as they need to.
I have the TRF Works bladder shocks which are much nicer and obviously easier to deal with. There still is maintenance involved but you can run a whole day of racing without the shocks changing at all.
The aeration shocks are nice, but they don't seal as good as they need to.