![]() |
Originally Posted by or8ital
(Post 7641821)
Wonder if there will be Rubber and Foam versions or just Rubber.
|
Originally Posted by K_Spec_RC
(Post 7641281)
Since the last thread dissapeared into the firey abiss along with said troll... :lol::lol: I'll re-post my qestion :D
Rick, is there any chance of AE releasing a spool with replaceable plastic outdrives?
Originally Posted by spongerX
(Post 7641223)
Hopefully AE launches with a fully race prepped version and not a lower end model followed by the team version a few months later.
Nice that they're re-using the arms and C-hubs as these are items I tend to go through the most so have a good supply of spares since I don't have any hobby stores in the country I live in. Definitely looking forward to the launch and will be picking one up soon after launch (once it's a full race version) :D
Originally Posted by haywood
(Post 7641737)
I'd bet it will be in that $369 to $389 range don't you think?
Originally Posted by Damnit Man
(Post 7641741)
The TC6 will probably only be a "Factory Team kit". The TC5 was only available as a Factory Team model. I can't wait for this kit to be released! They mentioned different shocks in the RedRC article, has anyone seen the different shocks?
Originally Posted by or8ital
(Post 7641821)
Wonder if there will be Rubber and Foam versions or just Rubber.
|
Rick, When will AE post pics on the site to? I want to get a closer look at the steering bell crank.
|
Hi Rick!
Can you tell me, if new tc6 slipper spool or solid axle are the same dimmensions like tc5? Or it is new part and from tc5 my solid axle (own build) will not fit? Regards and wish you good luck! m |
Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart
(Post 7643688)
There will just be a TC6 Factory Team. It works equally well on carpet, asphalt, rubber, or foam.
|
Excellent! Vertical inner ballstud mounts, PLEASE. :sweat:
|
Originally Posted by DaveW
(Post 7644023)
Excellent! Vertical inner ballstud mounts, PLEASE. :sweat:
|
Some questions I asked in the last thread but never got answered;
What advantage does running the same bulkheads front and rear have? I think that it must be something for equal or optimized front to rear flex. I would imagine that that equal front rear flex would create a balanced car that would become a lot easier to create a good balanced set up for track to track. But I could be wrong. With motor mounts and such items I am not sure how you can get decent flex balance anyway. Not to bring back in the troll topic, but will a gear diff be brought out for this car from Associated? Will they see the light of gear diffs and have one in the kit, or ready when it comes out? To bad we cant see the likes of Ryan Cavalieri and other top Associated drivers do more on road with the new car. Be cool to see the big names. |
Originally Posted by Owen RaCing
(Post 7644126)
Some questions I asked in the last thread but never got answered;
What advantage does running the same bulkheads front and rear have? I think that it must be something for equal or optimized front to rear flex. I would imagine that that equal front rear flex would create a balanced car that would become a lot easier to create a good balanced set up for track to track. But I could be wrong. With motor mounts and such items I am not sure how you can get decent flex balance anyway. Not to bring back in the troll topic, but will a gear diff be brought out for this car from Associated? Will they see the light of gear diffs and have one in the kit, or ready when it comes out? To bad we cant see the likes of Ryan Cavalieri and other top Associated drivers do more on road with the new car. Be cool to see the big names. |
Originally Posted by Hebiki
(Post 7644168)
in addition to your point......maybe identical bulkheads are cheaper to manufacture and they'll pass some of that savings onto to the racer? carrying spares would be easier also. :nod: :nod:
Kentech explanation Reading this gave me the initial thought of what must make the same bulkheads better. He does go on to drive the car in another blog post and say it is different handling 416 than a stock one. Interesting. |
Originally Posted by Castradamus
(Post 7643817)
Rick, When will AE post pics on the site to? I want to get a closer look at the steering bell crank.
Originally Posted by M.Abramowicz
(Post 7643860)
Hi Rick!
Can you tell me, if new tc6 slipper spool or solid axle are the same dimmensions like tc5? Or it is new part and from tc5 my solid axle (own build) will not fit? Regards and wish you good luck! m
Originally Posted by Hebiki
(Post 7644168)
in addition to your point......maybe identical bulkheads are cheaper to manufacture and they'll pass some of that savings onto to the racer? carrying spares would be easier also. :nod: :nod:
Originally Posted by Owen RaCing
(Post 7644126)
Some questions I asked in the last thread but never got answered;
What advantage does running the same bulkheads front and rear have? I think that it must be something for equal or optimized front to rear flex. I would imagine that that equal front rear flex would create a balanced car that would become a lot easier to create a good balanced set up for track to track. But I could be wrong. With motor mounts and such items I am not sure how you can get decent flex balance anyway. Not to bring back in the troll topic, but will a gear diff be brought out for this car from Associated? Will they see the light of gear diffs and have one in the kit, or ready when it comes out? To bad we cant see the likes of Ryan Cavalieri and other top Associated drivers do more on road with the new car. Be cool to see the big names.
Originally Posted by Cpt.America
(Post 7643904)
I would think, that if it works equally well on low traction asphault and high traction carpet, that just means that performance will be compromised on both, as both conditions really require vastly different amounts of chassis flex... am i wrong?
|
Originally Posted by Cpt.America
(Post 7643904)
I would think, that if it works equally well on low traction asphault and high traction carpet, that just means that performance will be compromised on both, as both conditions really require vastly different amounts of chassis flex... am i wrong?
I don't believe the hype......I don't want a wet noodle & I don't want a brick. Give me something in the middle, and I'll use the suspension in its entirety to get the car where it needs to be. Just my $.02 ;) |
Originally Posted by JayBee
(Post 7644609)
Yes....FORGET chassis flex as the major factor. Work on the suspension the way its supposed to be used, and you can make the car fast from track to track/surface to surface.
I don't believe the hype......I don't want a wet noodle & I don't want a brick. Give me something in the middle, and I'll use the suspension in its entirety to get the car where it needs to be. Just my $.02 ;) |
In my absence from RC for the past few years a lot has changed. One of the many things i have noticed, is an apparent difference in rubber tire compounds for TC.
I still have sets of Sorex and RP tires from 4+ years ago that clearly outperform their newer counterparts. The newer compounds feel inconsistent, and do not seem to handle heat as well as the previous compounds did. With that said, a little chassis flex isnt a bad thing as it will help negate tire inconsistency and make the car feel smooth and easy to drive. I just want a car thats tunable, durable, and a 'Jack of all Surfaces'. Ill wheel the rest... :nod: |
Originally Posted by JayBee
(Post 7644609)
Yes....FORGET chassis flex as the major factor. Work on the suspension the way its supposed to be used, and you can make the car fast from track to track/surface to surface.
I don't believe the hype......I don't want a wet noodle & I don't want a brick. Give me something in the middle, and I'll use the suspension in its entirety to get the car where it needs to be. Just my $.02 ;) |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 07:14 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.