Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Like Tree6563Likes

USGT

Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2021 | 10:28 AM
  #10621  
NutDriver's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,158
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by simple
This is getting outta control... Do all things lead to an ugly wedge?!
HARD PASS
https://www.redrc.net/2021/05/xtreme...y/#more-199360

ETC has already banned it from competition under their umbrella.
NutDriver is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 03:40 AM
  #10622  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,035
From: Hoffman Estates, IL
Default

Originally Posted by mrreet2001
While I do see a trend of USGT bodies going this way, isn't this a Fronti body? Is this even going to be USGT legal?
I've not had a look at the rules in a while, but FWD certainly used to be allowed, and with no minimum weight at that. I've only ever seen a couple guys try it. I considered the T4F but it came out right as the local track shut down.
anthonyscardina is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 05:36 AM
  #10623  
mrreet2001's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,044
From: NW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by anthonyscardina
I've not had a look at the rules in a while, but FWD certainly used to be allowed, and with no minimum weight at that. I've only ever seen a couple guys try it. I considered the T4F but it came out right as the local track shut down.
Yes the chassis are allowed, but last I looked into it most of the bodies made specifically for the FWD / Fronti class were not on the approved list for USGT.
Example: Protoform Europa 1565 Is not on the USGT list. Also the Bitty HC-F isn't on the approved list.
mrreet2001 is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 06:11 AM
  #10624  
simple's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,102
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Default

A Body does not have to be on "the list" to be approved...

"Body Specifications: Refer to body list for currently available/approved bodies. FWD MUST use FWD bodies."
"Scale realism consideration: Bodies intended for the USGT class should conform as closely as possible to the full scale car it represents."
"Body approval is a subjective process"
"DISCONTINUED BODIES: Discontinued unlisted bodies will be added as the USVTA sees fit to add them in based on the spirit of the class. Your Local track can always make adjustments to this rule...Please use the following if you want to deviate from the Body list for local racing DISCONTINUED BODIES general guidelines: *Any 190mm or 200mm body appropriate for this class. *Body can be any body that is NOT or HAS NOT BEEN on the ROAR T2 body list."


Up until recently, all the FWD bodies have fallen within these guidelines, without ALL being on "the list"....
V8 Rumble likes this.
simple is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 06:23 AM
  #10625  
mrreet2001's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,044
From: NW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by simple
A Body does not have to be on "the list" to be approved...

"Body Specifications: Refer to body list for currently available/approved bodies. FWD MUST use FWD bodies."
"Scale realism consideration: Bodies intended for the USGT class should conform as closely as possible to the full scale car it represents."
"Body approval is a subjective process"
"DISCONTINUED BODIES: Discontinued unlisted bodies will be added as the USVTA sees fit to add them in based on the spirit of the class. Your Local track can always make adjustments to this rule...Please use the following if you want to deviate from the Body list for local racing DISCONTINUED BODIES general guidelines: *Any 190mm or 200mm body appropriate for this class. *Body can be any body that is NOT or HAS NOT BEEN on the ROAR T2 body list."


Up until recently, all the FWD bodies have fallen within these guidelines, without ALL being on "the list"....
Please use the following if you want to deviate from the Body list for local racing
A local track can make any mods to the rules they want.
NutDriver and V8 Rumble like this.
mrreet2001 is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 06:32 AM
  #10626  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 320
From: CT
Default

I use my europa and another racer used the zoo racing gorilla. I just went by the guide lines and asked the track.
simple and NutDriver like this.
V8 Rumble is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 06:39 AM
  #10627  
STLNLST's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,291
From: Sacramento
Default

90% of the tracks use modified Roar rules anyway. Roar never originally outlined rules for brushless classes to begin with let alone body approvals. The way I see USGT is like trying to saddle train a wild horse. They have let so much stuff go that it will be damn near impossible to real it back in. The USGT spec motor is probably the best idea for the class but locally and online ive heard whining of it’s slower than my certified this of I dont want to buy another motor that.....we as racers SUCK. We a decision is made for us we will bitch and complain and then if no decision is made and it’s left to interpretation (sort of like now) we complain of yester year. The top guys locally have been fast with the spec motor and whatever “Roar leagl”🤦🏽‍♂️ Motor they decide to run. USGT is broken down into so many levels in my area that I’m almost tempted to push for a 6ft and over class.....hell everything else has a class🤣🤣🤣🤣. I just want to have fun in the class and work on driving if the playing field is level because the rules are CLEARLY outlined and followed. If you’re wondering what area I’m referring to it’s Northern California.

Last edited by STLNLST; 05-28-2021 at 03:18 PM.
STLNLST is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 07:00 AM
  #10628  
mrreet2001's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,044
From: NW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by STLNLST
90% of the tracks us modified Roar rules anyway. Roar never originally outlined rules for brushless classes to begin with let alone body approvals. The way I see USGT is like trying to saddle train a wild horse. They have let so much stuff go that it will be damn near impossible to real it back in. The USGT spec motor is probably the best idea for the class but locally and online ive heard whining of it’s slower than my certified this of I dont want to buy another motor that.....we as racers SUCK. We a decision is made for us we will bitch and complain and then if no decision is made and it’s left to interpretation (sort of like now) we complain of yester year. The top guys locally have been fast with the spec motor and whatever “Roar leagl”🤦🏽‍♂️ Motor they decide to run. USGT is broken down into so many levels in my area that I’m almost tempted to push for a 6ft and over class.....hell everything else has a class🤣🤣🤣🤣. I just want to have fun in the class and work on driving if the playing field is level because the rules are CLEARLY outlined and followed. If you’re wondering what area I’m referring to it’s Northern California.
USGT isn't a ROAR class.
Marcos.J likes this.
mrreet2001 is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 08:07 AM
  #10629  
robk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,314
From: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Default

That body would never make it.

The usgt body rules have been changed. After seeing some recent trends, i wanted to let everyone know there won't be much tolerance for stuff like the sherock

http://www.usvintagetransam.com/rule...es5-9-2021.pdf
OSherman, DARKSIDE, simple and 3 others like this.
robk is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 11:46 AM
  #10630  
JayL's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,111
From: Ca
Default

STLNLST: I'd be down for that 6ft and over class with you

to me the spec motor is dumb, ROAR already has extreme motor testing rules, why create more monopolies?

We went to the 'all same tested motor' for an entire series, guess what: the same guys finished in the same order they did before the enforced motor rule.

That said I do wish we had more of a four door GT body oriented class/ruleset
JayL is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 02:31 PM
  #10631  
robk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,314
From: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Default

The spec motor will be the same for the foreseeable future, unlike the open motor situation where there is a new hotness every few months.
robk is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 03:22 PM
  #10632  
STLNLST's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,291
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by mrreet2001
USGT isn't a ROAR class.
yet all track seem to follow Roar based rules for equipment....batteries, motors....etc. only one track here in Northern California embraced the actual USGT rules with the spec motor and it didn’t even last a whole season as you have R1 home track and Team Powers home track in surrounding areas.

STLNLST is offline  
Old 05-28-2021 | 03:28 PM
  #10633  
STLNLST's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,291
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by JayL
STLNLST: I'd be down for that 6ft and over class with you

to me the spec motor is dumb, ROAR already has extreme motor testing rules, why create more monopolies?

We went to the 'all same tested motor' for an entire series, guess what: the same guys finished in the same order they did before the enforced motor rule.

That said I do wish we had more of a four door GT body oriented class/ruleset
Roar doesn’t even enforce some of their own rules so bad example to use....lol. The spec motor was great IMO as if gave the whiners what they wanted as they said all the fast guys have hand picked motors. You’ve been there hearing the same bs I heard. Then the spec motor was too slow 😭.

when are you coming out of retirement? F1 has been pretty killer lately. USGT has been a blast as well.

Marcos.J likes this.
STLNLST is offline  
Old 05-29-2021 | 10:44 AM
  #10634  
OSherman's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,602
From: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Default

Originally Posted by robk
That body would never make it.

The usgt body rules have been changed. After seeing some recent trends, i wanted to let everyone know there won't be much tolerance for stuff like the sherock

http://www.usvintagetransam.com/rule...es5-9-2021.pdf

I sincerely say ThankYou.
OSherman is offline  
Old 05-29-2021 | 09:24 PM
  #10635  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 358
Default Roar is a joke

Originally Posted by JayL
STLNLST: I'd be down for that 6ft and over class with you

to me the spec motor is dumb, ROAR already has extreme motor testing rules, why create more monopolies?

We went to the 'all same tested motor' for an entire series, guess what: the same guys finished in the same order they did before the enforced motor rule.

That said I do wish we had more of a four door GT body oriented class/ruleset
Roar changes the rules to fit the companies that it has friendships with . Example ( the R1 rotor rule ) and most tracks allow motors that aren’t even roar legal . They just have to be built to roar specs in hope that they pass and everyone is allowed to run them.
STLNLST and casrcr like this.
john holmes 69 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.