Like Tree820Likes

USGT

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-12-2017, 12:28 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: USGT
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: DARKSIDE
USIC USGT 2016 Motor and Chassis list in qualifing order

TQ A.F. TSR A800
2nd D.J. TeamPowers A800
3rd B.S. TSR A800
4th M.L. TSR A800
5th M.F TeamPowers A800
6th D.J TSR Destiny
7th J.W. Trinity Monster '17 Xray
8th C.V TSR Destiny
9 A.C. TSR A700
10 B.K. R1 v15 A700
11
12
13 J.L. TSR A800
14 M.L. TSR Destiny
15
16 J.M. TSR. 15 Xray
17
18 R.C. TSR T4
19 M.K. Reedy Powered M3 AE TC7
20 S.J. TSR Destiny
21
22 E.S. motiv T4
23
24
25
26 P.D. TSR Destiny
27
28
29
30 V.P. Reedy M3 serpent 3.0
31
32
33
34
35 Y.B. Fantom A800
36
37
38 R.C. TSR A800
39
40 W.S. Reedy
41
42
43 Motiv xray
44
45
46 Motiv Xray
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Print Wikipost

Reply

Old 09-16-2010, 10:47 AM
  #46  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (113)
 
hotrodchevy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,498
Trader Rating: 113 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by smokefan View Post
+1
+1 here also use the same esc as vta will make it more fun.
hotrodchevy14 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 12:43 PM
  #47  
Tech Master
 
kdeselms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,019
Default

At our track, we have something similar (but a little simpler) to this. However, we require zero timing advance mode (most programmable esc's can be updated to include this mode). We also run solaris hard compound tires as a spec tire, they last a very long time on pavement. It is a class that attracts new people (due to slower speeds, realistic bodies and a level playing field) and also experienced guys, because it emphasizes quality driving over raw speed and electronic trickery. We just refer to it as Super GT.

I think zero timing is crucial. Timing boost has seriously damaged rcgt out here and frankly, it makes this hobby/sport that much harder (and intimidating) for new people to enter.
kdeselms is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 08:38 PM
  #48  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I can't think of it exactly but there was a class or a car or something else called Super GT. Once upon a time.
snoopyrc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:12 PM
  #49  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,687
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Pros:
GT cars look nice, marginally faster than TA, nice stepping stone out of TA or starting point for the beginning racer. Is fairly inexpensive to start up.

Cons:
Open Speed controls, open 21.5 motors, potentially faster than the 17.5 stock/locked timing TCs. Could become as bad as TC with speedo wars.

Suggestion: Use 25.5s if you want the open ESC, else stick to the 21.5 Cirtix combo. It will still be marginally faster than TA and promote close competition. If other companies come on board with an acceptable combo, like Novak, Tekin etc, then regulate them into the mix.

In my opinion, push the easy button and lets race em.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:34 PM
  #50  
Tech Master
 
kdeselms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,019
Default

Originally Posted by snoopyrc View Post
I can't think of it exactly but there was a class or a car or something else called Super GT. Once upon a time.
Yeah, but there's also a "Formula 1" and people don't rename the RC Formula 1 racing to some alternate acronym like "RCF1" - why do we insist on complicating everything
kdeselms is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:59 PM
  #51  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I think I have heard the term RCF1 used as well.

Oh yeah here. http://www.rcf1.com/
snoopyrc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 05:00 PM
  #52  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Buckaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,503
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Any more traction on this?
Buckaroo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 08:17 PM
  #53  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 78
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

we have been running 21.5/open speedo with 17.5/non programmable and they are very close in speeds and lap times, I dont see where either has an advantage other than driver skill..
slashman4x4 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 09:07 PM
  #54  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
bkspeedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Fun, CO
Posts: 3,142
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

What's the formula that made Short Course and Rock Crawling so popular???



Here it is, READY TO RUN from a manufacture and cheap.



This is the problem with spec classes for on-road, there's zero manufacture support. We need manufactures to put together RTR's that are basically the same or follow a set of rules.

That way when people go into a hobby shop and want to start racing there not overwhelmed with all the separate items they need to buy just to race.

HPI made an attempt by releasing a VTA RTR but screwed up by not following the rules and put the wrong kind of motor and ESC in the car. If they just would have done the right thing VTA may be much larger than it is today.

I love on-road racing and am extremely disappoint in the decline that has occurred over the last few years. But people have a tendency to migrate where most others have and that's Short Course at this point.

So Rob or anyone else with links to a manufacture if you want on-road to make a resurgence we need an RTR from more than 1 manufacture that follow the same rules and is inexpensive. It can be done, it doesn’t have be a carbon fiber high end TC to be successful. Once people get hooked on racing they'll move into other classes. This is exactly what all the manufactures of Short Course trucks have done and now it’s the largest RC class in the US.

I commend Rob and others for trying to create a new class and I hope it's successful.
bkspeedo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 07:53 AM
  #55  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 8,721
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

you talking about this...and it still has the logo.....can Novak and HPI get together for us and we will see the change in the wind...Ive been seeing ppl go buy the Sprint Sport VTA(Camaro Z28) and change out the ele...fairly cheap still, but still not RTR...

http://www.hpiracing.com/kitinfo/100422/
DARKSIDE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 01:01 PM
  #56  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
bkspeedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Fun, CO
Posts: 3,142
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DARKSIDE View Post
you talking about this...and it still has the logo.....can Novak and HPI get together for us and we will see the change in the wind...Ive been seeing ppl go buy the Sprint Sport VTA(Camaro Z28) and change out the ele...fairly cheap still, but still not RTR...

http://www.hpiracing.com/kitinfo/100422/
That's it. I can't believe they would put a 5700Kv motor in a VTA car. Rob you should get all over these guy's for using the USVTA logo but not being complaint with the rules.

Last edited by bkspeedo; 10-27-2010 at 01:15 PM.
bkspeedo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 05:42 PM
  #57  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
cwoods34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indy-freakin'-ana
Posts: 1,156
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Everyone seems to like the 2 powertrain options here in Indy. We tested standard rubber tires over X-Patterns this past Sunday and it worked out fine. Out of our 8 or so cars we had every combination of body/motor/tire you could use.
cwoods34 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 09:48 PM
  #58  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 8,721
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

you guys still at Indy Slots and the Rug?...
DARKSIDE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 01:12 PM
  #59  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 272
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

The RUG
smokefan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 03:49 PM
  #60  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

HPI loves VTA and I am sure would love to produce an RTR that would plug right in to the program. The problem is that you have to produce these things in HUGE numbers to make them cost effective. Making the Sprint with the Novak out of the box or just producing it without a motor or esc is just not feasable because they have to cater to the basher market as well. Thats the lions share of their sales. The only way it works as well as it does is because they can sell it to bashers and the VTA guy can pick it up and just make the changes to the powertrain. Of course you no longer have to spend the money for the Flux. Now you can get the sprint2 sport with the new 69 Camaro shell and VTA wheels. At least I think you can.
snoopyrc is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Terms of Service