Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever... >

1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2909Likes

1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2014, 02:17 PM
  #10411  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Cadman1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 551
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dan
http://www.amain.com/advanced_search...+wheel&x=0&y=0

I think "narrow" wheels are what you want. I haven't tried them but they look similar to the F104 foam wheels.
Has anyone tried them? i would "assume" they are similar to the Tamiya ones and use the same bearings, but can someone confirm?

Edit: i found the manual in japanese, it takes 5x10 bearings, so that's a good start...
Cadman1981 is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 12:41 PM
  #10412  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
firefoxussr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 352
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

I have an F103, I want to run a shorty lipo (already done BL/esc)... what has worked for people mounting the battery? I considered getting a chassis conversion just for this reason.

Also... If i decide to not go that route... I've been eyeballing the FGX with IFS conversion... why doesn't everyone want one of these? ... it's RWD with independent pushrod suspension.
firefoxussr is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 01:05 PM
  #10413  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr
I have an F103, I want to run a shorty lipo (already done BL/esc)... what has worked for people mounting the battery? I considered getting a chassis conversion just for this reason.

Also... If i decide to not go that route... I've been eyeballing the FGX with IFS conversion... why doesn't everyone want one of these? ... it's RWD with independent pushrod suspension.
Shorty battery taped lengthwise of the battery to the upper deck works. 2 layers of strapping tape and rounding off all sharp edges Is what I do. it hasn't moved in a crash. You can also put a couple tabs of tape on the lower chassis to keep the battery off the T-bar.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 01:09 PM
  #10414  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
wtcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,031
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

The fgx gearing and rear suspension eats too much of the 21.5t motor strength. Direct drive chassis will pass you easily on every straight. The time you loose there won't be gained back in the infield...
wtcc is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 01:24 PM
  #10415  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr
I have an F103, I want to run a shorty lipo (already done BL/esc)... what has worked for people mounting the battery? I considered getting a chassis conversion just for this reason.

Also... If i decide to not go that route... I've been eyeballing the FGX with IFS conversion... why doesn't everyone want one of these? ... it's RWD with independent pushrod suspension.
Like wtcc said, it's not competitive. I have 2 and tried to justify upgrade after upgrade and just couldn't any more. With that being said, the FGX almost won at nationals finishing second. It was in the hands of a very skilled driver and had a custom McKune CF chassis under it. Take a 100g off of it and reduce the gear drag and it would be a winning car.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 01:52 PM
  #10416  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
firefoxussr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 352
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by liljohn1064
Like wtcc said, it's not competitive. I have 2 and tried to justify upgrade after upgrade and just couldn't any more. ..Take a 100g off of it and reduce the gear drag and it would be a winning car.
Originally Posted by wtcc
The fgx gearing and rear suspension eats too much of the 21.5t motor strength. Direct drive chassis will pass you easily on every straight. The time you loose there won't be gained back in the infield...
Interesting, I had no idea the losses of that little belt were so pronounced. And I hear you about the weight... it just looks heavy. Not that Exotek couldn't sell you something to fix that.

Perhaps I'm better off getting an F103/F104 CF kit (i see the Yeah Racing Transformula has plummeted in price).

Thoughts on the Yeah Racing Transformula?

Also... F103 turnbuckles... same as F103RM? I have the stock tamiya rods... they bend often.

Last edited by firefoxussr; 06-11-2014 at 02:07 PM.
firefoxussr is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 04:06 PM
  #10417  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr
Interesting, I had no idea the losses of that little belt were so pronounced. And I hear you about the weight... it just looks heavy. Not that Exotek couldn't sell you something to fix that.

Perhaps I'm better off getting an F103/F104 CF kit (i see the Yeah Racing Transformula has plummeted in price).

Thoughts on the Yeah Racing Transformula?

Also... F103 turnbuckles... same as F103RM? I have the stock tamiya rods... they bend often.
The FGX doesn't use a belt...it has a gear transmission. A few people have converted it to belt and it does help...but it is still not as free as direct drive and still considerably heavier.

One of our local racers picked up the transformula kit...we couldn't get it to run well. If Exotek still makes their F103 conversion you are probably better off getting one of them. I'm not sure if you can get them anymore though.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 04:54 AM
  #10418  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

I have a transformula and it is awesome on carpet. You must do some changes to make it work with f104 bodies and tires.
http://rcf1blog.blogspot.com/2013/06...ngula.html?m=1

Last edited by robk; 06-13-2014 at 08:01 AM.
robk is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 07:52 AM
  #10419  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Condor Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Valrico Fl
Posts: 507
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Anybody experience this issue with ride tires and tunning haus wheels ? There is a gap in the middle of the front tires kind of suck in. Is it going to get flat after a few runs?
Attached Thumbnails 1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...-image.jpg  
Condor Speed is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 11:33 AM
  #10420  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
wtcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,031
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

@Condor Speed: It looks like there is no insert in use or the wheel is to wide...

Another question: Did someone here do the Exotek F1R2 conversion to his F104 and can give some feedback about his experience/ the performance on track?
wtcc is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 01:40 PM
  #10421  
R/C Tech Elite Member
 
JayL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 3,111
Default

Originally Posted by Condor Speed
Anybody experience this issue with ride tires and tunning haus wheels ? There is a gap in the middle of the front tires kind of suck in. Is it going to get flat after a few runs?
Pretty sure the ride tires have to be used on ride rims. At least that's the assumption I have always been under and that's what it says on tqrcracing.com website under the ride tire
JayL is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 03:47 PM
  #10422  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Condor Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Valrico Fl
Posts: 507
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=wtcc;13333591]@Condor Speed: It looks like there is no insert in use or the wheel is to wide...

I use the foam insert that came with the tire and the wheel is correct "front wheel F1 tunning haus for rubber tire"
Condor Speed is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 04:14 PM
  #10423  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

The Tamiya rubber tire and the Ride rubber tires are different and can not mount on the same rim. The new Tamiya tire is the same as a Pit Shimizu tire and mounts to the foam rims. The old Tamiya tire mounted to a rubber tire rim but the diameter of the inside sidewall of the tire is larger than the outside sidewall where the Ride tires have the same diameter on both sides. So if the Tuning Haus rims are made for Tamiya rubber tires of either sort...they will not work with the Ride tires.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 04:19 PM
  #10424  
Tech Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Vyger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 550
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

It almost looks like a front wheel with a rear tire.
Attached Thumbnails 1/10 R/C F1's...Pics, Discussions, Whatever...-front-whl-rear-tire.jpg  
Vyger is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 04:19 PM
  #10425  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 210
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=Condor Speed;13334027]
Originally Posted by wtcc
@Condor Speed: It looks like there is no insert in use or the wheel is to wide...

I use the foam insert that came with the tire and the wheel is correct "front wheel F1 tunning haus for rubber tire"
The ride wheels are smaller than the 104 wheels, so when you stretch the smaller ride tires onto the 104 size wheel this will happen, you must use the ride tires with the ride wheels.
disaac is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.