eZRUN brushless system
#586
Tech Rookie
The last bit makes perfect sense.
You'd get a slightly finer control on a 30a Esc than a 60a Esc, but it seems like the difference is less than most of us can actually notice.
I really don't understand the kv requirements though.
To be honest i think the mods have been patient with me so far for hi-jacking this thread though so i really don't want to push me luck as a noob.
So if anyone has any links i'll happily read away.
If not i do have 1 more question please.
I've read up on BLDC motors, i understand how the differ from brushed motor and i understand how they work.
I also understand that rock crawlers will be geared for better torque and less speed.
But if say i went say brushless in my nitro firestorm then surely it would need a motor with more current draw than a motor in my pro3, if the top speed target was the same?
Wouldn't classing motors in a power/speed context be more accurate say 4600kv at 16k rpm?
I'm really enjoying learning all this, so if my enthusiasm is getting the best of me please just direct me towards some good faq pages and i'll lap em up.
Cheers
Mark
You'd get a slightly finer control on a 30a Esc than a 60a Esc, but it seems like the difference is less than most of us can actually notice.
I really don't understand the kv requirements though.
To be honest i think the mods have been patient with me so far for hi-jacking this thread though so i really don't want to push me luck as a noob.
So if anyone has any links i'll happily read away.
If not i do have 1 more question please.
I've read up on BLDC motors, i understand how the differ from brushed motor and i understand how they work.
I also understand that rock crawlers will be geared for better torque and less speed.
But if say i went say brushless in my nitro firestorm then surely it would need a motor with more current draw than a motor in my pro3, if the top speed target was the same?
Wouldn't classing motors in a power/speed context be more accurate say 4600kv at 16k rpm?
I'm really enjoying learning all this, so if my enthusiasm is getting the best of me please just direct me towards some good faq pages and i'll lap em up.
Cheers
Mark
Here is an explanation of it out of Wikipedia:
The Kv rating of a design of brushless motor is the constant relating the motors unloaded RPM to the (peak, not RMS) voltage on the wires connected to the coils (the "back-EMF"). For example, a 5700 Kv motor, supplied with 11.1 volts, will run at a nominal 63270 rpm. By Lenz's law, a running motor will create a back-EMF proportional to the RPM. Most ESCs do not boost the battery voltage. Once a motor is spinning so fast that the back-EMF is at or above the battery voltage, it is impossible for those ESCs to "speed up" that motor, even with no load. Kv is the voltage constant (capital-K, subscript v), not to be confused with the kilovolt, whose symbol is kV (lower-case k, capital V)
The rating is quite simple really for every volt you get x amount of unloaded rpm i.e 6000Kv motor on 11.1 v = 66600 unloaded rpm.
Rock crawlers are not just geared slow but they have low Kv motors or high turn brushed motors, they are inherently slower turning motors on any given volt.
Your Firestorm would probably end up drawing more amps due to it being heavier, but it's not something you can just calculate, it's kind of the result of your experiment. You could use a 3900 Kv motor on it and end up drawing more amps on it's setup than on your tc running 6000Kv - this could be due to a more efficient drive train and lighter weight on the Tc
Current draw is not something that stays constant even in the same car setup, it's more when going up hill, riding in long grass, having tall gearing, having more weight, snagging drive shaft and so forth - it's the equivalent of fuel consumption in a gasoline car.
Not sure I understand where you coming from here:
Wouldn't classing motors in a power/speed context be more accurate say 4600kv at 16k rpm?
Last edited by yeahbaby; 07-23-2009 at 11:11 AM.
#587
I think your are misunderstanding the the term "Kv"
Here is an explanation of it out of Wikipedia:
The Kv rating of a design of brushless motor is the constant relating the motors unloaded RPM to the (peak, not RMS) voltage on the wires connected to the coils (the "back-EMF"). For example, a 5700 Kv motor, supplied with 11.1 volts, will run at a nominal 63270 rpm. By Lenz's law, a running motor will create a back-EMF proportional to the RPM. Most ESCs do not boost the battery voltage. Once a motor is spinning so fast that the back-EMF is at or above the battery voltage, it is impossible for those ESCs to "speed up" that motor, even with no load. Kv is the voltage constant (capital-K, subscript v), not to be confused with the kilovolt, whose symbol is kV (lower-case k, capital V)
The rating is quite simple really for every volt you get x amount of unloaded rpm i.e 6000Kv motor on 11.1 v = 66600 unloaded rpm.
Rock crawlers are not just geared slow but they have low Kv motors or high turn brushed motors, they are inherently slower turning motors on any given volt.
Your Firestorm would probably end up drawing more amps due to it being heavier, but it's not something you can just calculate, it's kind of the result of your experiment. You could use a 3900 Kv motor on it and end up drawing more amps on it's setup than on your tc running 6000Kv - this could be due to a more efficient drive train and lighter weight on the Tc
Current draw is not something that stays constant even in the same car setup, it's more when going up hill, riding in long grass, having tall gearing, having more weight, snagging drive shaft and so forth - it's the equivalent of fuel consumption in a gasoline car.
Not sure I understand where you coming from here:
Wouldn't classing motors in a power/speed context be more accurate say 4600kv at 16k rpm?
Here is an explanation of it out of Wikipedia:
The Kv rating of a design of brushless motor is the constant relating the motors unloaded RPM to the (peak, not RMS) voltage on the wires connected to the coils (the "back-EMF"). For example, a 5700 Kv motor, supplied with 11.1 volts, will run at a nominal 63270 rpm. By Lenz's law, a running motor will create a back-EMF proportional to the RPM. Most ESCs do not boost the battery voltage. Once a motor is spinning so fast that the back-EMF is at or above the battery voltage, it is impossible for those ESCs to "speed up" that motor, even with no load. Kv is the voltage constant (capital-K, subscript v), not to be confused with the kilovolt, whose symbol is kV (lower-case k, capital V)
The rating is quite simple really for every volt you get x amount of unloaded rpm i.e 6000Kv motor on 11.1 v = 66600 unloaded rpm.
Rock crawlers are not just geared slow but they have low Kv motors or high turn brushed motors, they are inherently slower turning motors on any given volt.
Your Firestorm would probably end up drawing more amps due to it being heavier, but it's not something you can just calculate, it's kind of the result of your experiment. You could use a 3900 Kv motor on it and end up drawing more amps on it's setup than on your tc running 6000Kv - this could be due to a more efficient drive train and lighter weight on the Tc
Current draw is not something that stays constant even in the same car setup, it's more when going up hill, riding in long grass, having tall gearing, having more weight, snagging drive shaft and so forth - it's the equivalent of fuel consumption in a gasoline car.
Not sure I understand where you coming from here:
Wouldn't classing motors in a power/speed context be more accurate say 4600kv at 16k rpm?
Makes perfect sense now, again thanks for taking the time and patience in explaining it.
Cheers
Mark
#588
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
How are you guys connecting your motors?
The motors do not come with wires and only female bullet connectors were included with my Hobbywing B4 Combos. I'll be putting these in our Slash trucks so the ESC wires are not long enough to solder directly to the motor tabs and I'm not sure the motor tabs are intended for repeated soldering. I'm assuming the female bullet connectors are intended for the ESC wires so I will need to get male bullet connectors and create my own motor wires.
#589
I used the bullet connectors and shrink that came with the speed control as solder joints to extend my wires and then direct soldered them to the motor in my RS4 MT setup. The motor solder tabs are as good as any other brushless motor and should hold up just fine. I don't plan on removing the motor from the car much so it is really a non-issue. This way, no additional items were needed. The holes in the motor tabs made soldering neat and easy. I posted a couple photos to illustrate. The setup works very well.
#590
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: anywhere I can race 2wd dirt,and 1/12 onroad in MI.
Posts: 3,891
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
I used the bullet connectors and shrink that came with the speed control as solder joints to extend my wires and then direct soldered them to the motor in my RS4 MT setup. The motor solder tabs are as good as any other brushless motor and should hold up just fine. I don't plan on removing the motor from the car much so it is really a non-issue. This way, no additional items were needed. The holes in the motor tabs made soldering neat and easy. I posted a couple photos to illustrate. The setup works very well.
#591
Tech Regular
Sorry I should explain it more clearly. The V2 is USB ready and you need to purchase the optional program box for it to connect to your PC. The program box come with the software and the USB cable.
http://www.hobbywing.com/english/Art...?ArticleID=446
http://www.hobbywing.com/english/Art...?ArticleID=446
#592
Tech Addict
35A esc question
Will the 35A hobbywing esc be OK with a true 540 type motor??
ie: a Trinity Stock Equivalent Duo Brushless 13.5
http://www.teamtrinity.com/shop/item...?item=TRI10210
Its for drift so I know thats a bit less power drain on the esc
ie: a Trinity Stock Equivalent Duo Brushless 13.5
http://www.teamtrinity.com/shop/item...?item=TRI10210
Its for drift so I know thats a bit less power drain on the esc
Last edited by 1101; 07-28-2009 at 11:38 PM. Reason: mistake
#593
Tech Apprentice
setup
I've got a hobbywing bl speedo, or at least it looks like one that I bought from a friend recently. I can't figure out how to set it up as it doesn't seem to have a setup button. It has what looks like could be a button, and the speedo beeps repeatedly when I've held the button before turning it on, but other than that, it doesn't seem like I can get it setup.
The big problem is that at the mo, I've got nothing, then I suddenly get a surge of power, as though there is a delay on the speedo. I'm going to get a better speedo at some point, but the person I bought this off waterproofed it really good, so it'll eventually end up in my wet car.
Anyone know what I might have and how to set it up? Anything to identify it has been removed.
The big problem is that at the mo, I've got nothing, then I suddenly get a surge of power, as though there is a delay on the speedo. I'm going to get a better speedo at some point, but the person I bought this off waterproofed it really good, so it'll eventually end up in my wet car.
Anyone know what I might have and how to set it up? Anything to identify it has been removed.
#594
Has anyone tried this ESC ? It seems very cheap, even by Ezrun prices. Is it any good for 1/10th touring cars ?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Regards,
32819toon
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Regards,
32819toon
#595
I've got a hobbywing bl speedo, or at least it looks like one that I bought from a friend recently. I can't figure out how to set it up as it doesn't seem to have a setup button. It has what looks like could be a button, and the speedo beeps repeatedly when I've held the button before turning it on, but other than that, it doesn't seem like I can get it setup.
The big problem is that at the mo, I've got nothing, then I suddenly get a surge of power, as though there is a delay on the speedo. I'm going to get a better speedo at some point, but the person I bought this off waterproofed it really good, so it'll eventually end up in my wet car.
Anyone know what I might have and how to set it up? Anything to identify it has been removed.
The big problem is that at the mo, I've got nothing, then I suddenly get a surge of power, as though there is a delay on the speedo. I'm going to get a better speedo at some point, but the person I bought this off waterproofed it really good, so it'll eventually end up in my wet car.
Anyone know what I might have and how to set it up? Anything to identify it has been removed.
#596
Tech Apprentice
manual
Allready tried that. There's no visible button for the setup on the speedo, there's no identifying marks anywhere on it. What I thought might have been the switch was a surface mounted capacitor that "broke" off the other day, and a friend of resoldered it for me. I'm not even sure it is an easy run, it might just look like one.
#597
Tech Addict
540 vs 380(finned) motor
Hi there.
How does the 540 hobbywing motor compare to the 380(finned) motor??
Is the Motor torque about the same or alot more ??
I was thing about swapping out my finned 9T for a 12T true 540 size hobbywing, I want less speed/more torque (for drifting).
How does the 540 hobbywing motor compare to the 380(finned) motor??
Is the Motor torque about the same or alot more ??
I was thing about swapping out my finned 9T for a 12T true 540 size hobbywing, I want less speed/more torque (for drifting).
#598
Tech Initiate
Allready tried that. There's no visible button for the setup on the speedo, there's no identifying marks anywhere on it. What I thought might have been the switch was a surface mounted capacitor that "broke" off the other day, and a friend of resoldered it for me. I'm not even sure it is an easy run, it might just look like one.
"Has anyone tried this ESC ? It seems very cheap, even by Ezrun prices. Is it any good for 1/10th touring cars ?
Regards,
32819toon"
"Design meets Environment protection, good for user's health"
sounds GREAT!
#600
got a 5.5 hobbywing in my TA05 too, surprisingly the kit ratio feels the best.