Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing >

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2011, 04:39 PM
  #10306  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Buckaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,576
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Scottrik
Perhaps a Dodge Lancer or Dodge Dart?

Or Pierce Arrow? Or "Silver Arrow"?

Or...?
Or the J word!
Buckaroo is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 05:20 PM
  #10307  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

I suppose...

Then it's a matter of which one:

The cool enough looking '68-9

The EXCELLENT looking '70 (hint hint, though I suppose it's late for that...)

Or the simply hideous '71-3 (the only Championship winning version...shudder)

A real lottery at this point, but I've called my painter guy and reserved a slot for late Feb. before our 2-day here JUST in case.

It would be easy enough (and more mileage out of the base mold) to do front and rear "caps" (and could get away with just the front) to do the '68-9 and the '70. Then for the '70 just add a "duck bill" spoiler and a hood bulge/scoop. Ah...excellence in a bag at that point.
Scottrik is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 05:25 PM
  #10308  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY/FL
Posts: 3,378
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by robk
Quite belatedly, I have posted USGT rules on the rules page at the USVTA site. It will be a class for the Nationals. I am bracing myself for your thoughts...
Another 17.5 class...Ho Hum, Ho Hum. Kinda kidding Rob. No offense meant at all. I was hoping for 21.5 as they've become kind of the bastard motor. Isn't 17.5 GT style racing dead in most places ?
Evoracer is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 05:31 PM
  #10309  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY/FL
Posts: 3,378
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Scottrik
I suppose...

Then it's a matter of which one:

The cool enough looking '68-9

The EXCELLENT looking '70 (hint hint, though I suppose it's late for that...)

Or the simply hideous '71-3 (the only Championship winning version...shudder)

A real lottery at this point, but I've called my painter guy and reserved a slot for late Feb. before our 2-day here JUST in case.

It would be easy enough (and more mileage out of the base mold) to do front and rear "caps" (and could get away with just the front) to do the '68-9 and the '70. Then for the '70 just add a "duck bill" spoiler and a hood bulge/scoop. Ah...excellence in a bag at that point.

Donahue's car was a 70'...right? Gotta wonder when they look for a marketable decal set....what will sell. 71-74 wasn't ugly !! They were ...unique I actually liked the later models and owned a 71' AMX. Love it or hate it....you always got attention.
Evoracer is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 05:43 PM
  #10310  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (75)
 
squarehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Evoracer
Another 17.5 class...Ho Hum, Ho Hum. Kinda kidding Rob. No offense meant at all. I was hoping for 21.5 as they've become kind of the bastard motor. Isn't 17.5 GT style racing dead in most places ?
No worries, there might be a use for your "bastard" 21.5s soon.
squarehead is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 06:20 PM
  #10311  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Evoracer
Donahue's car was a 70'...right? Gotta wonder when they look for a marketable decal set....what will sell. 71-74 wasn't ugly !! They were ...unique I actually liked the later models and owned a 71' AMX. Love it or hate it....you always got attention.
Donohue (Penske's) FIRST year was the '70, and the "street" model (a la Challenger TA, AAR Cuda, Z28 Camaro, etc) was the Mark Donohue Edition. I haven't seen one of those in a LOONG time, a buddy had one when we were in high school in the late '70's.

Penske/Donohue then won the championship in '71 (actually hung new sheetmetal on the '70 cars) after everybody else had gone home AND Traco figured out how to get power AND life out of the Rambler.

Sorry, we'll have to agree that they're "uniquely ugly".
Scottrik is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 06:55 PM
  #10312  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Evoracer
Another 17.5 class...Ho Hum, Ho Hum. Kinda kidding Rob. No offense meant at all. I was hoping for 21.5 as they've become kind of the bastard motor. Isn't 17.5 GT style racing dead in most places ?
I think its a easy call....most ppl are running 17.5 stock spec TC as a second class already...so a change of tires and body and you are ready to race...jmo

and if you are like me...I run GT bodies in TC anyway...on Jaco Blues.....a set of X-patterns and we racing
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 08:09 PM
  #10313  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY/FL
Posts: 3,378
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DARKSIDE
I think its a easy call....most ppl are running 17.5 stock spec TC as a second class already...so a change of tires and body and you are ready to race...jmo

and if you are like me...I run GT bodies in TC anyway...on Jaco Blues.....a set of X-patterns and we racing

Yep, thats the same answer i hear everywhere. Hell, down here in Florida the group running 17.5 VTA said the same thing when I e-mailed them and asked if they'd be adopting the current rules. Man....thank God the VTA directors didn't think that way. We're lucky, we got a unique situation not just once with 21.5 but twice with 25.5. Then again....I assume VTA drivers WANT to be the most unique crew in rc.
T'aint nuthin wrong with that !!
Evoracer is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:30 PM
  #10314  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 177
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Could someone point me to a setup sheet for the Xray 008 for VTA? I have been searching all over, including the xray site, and closest I found was a set up sheet for T3-VTA OR a 008-17.5 sheet.
rknott is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 10:00 PM
  #10315  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (49)
 
andrewdoherty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ★Wylie, TX★
Posts: 3,815
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/index.php?act=view&ID=2189&setup=t2_008

http://forum.teamxray.com/xform/inde...9&setup=t2_008
andrewdoherty is offline  
Old 01-28-2011, 03:54 AM
  #10316  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 291
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by robk
Quite belatedly, I have posted USGT rules on the rules page at the USVTA site. It will be a class for the Nationals. I am bracing myself for your thoughts...
Rob,

Sorry, but I think you missed the boat on this one. Change the motor rule to 21.5 and you would have nailed it. We have a small GT class running at our track with 21.5 and here are some of the reasons it works:

1. Speed wise, there is a big gap between VTA and Stock Rubber TC. 21.5 GT fits nicely between the two.

2. 17.5 is too much motor for cars like the FF-03 and TA-05. Yes, they can handle this much motor, but when running against modern carbon chassis with 17.5, they can't hang. The FF-03 becomes pretty much non-competitive. This is big for us as these two chassis' are what we mostly run in GT at the moment.

3. Most of us have old 21.5 motors laying around. We run GT as a second class to 17.5 Rubber TC. We have big dollars wrapped up into our 17.5 cars and like the fact that GT doesn't require a $500 chassis. To quote a previous post, it's just another 17.5 TC class. 17.5 effectively eliminates any front wheel drive, bathtub or shaft drive car.

4. Your tire rule works but I would have just specified the tire with HPI belted X pattern. They work great and wear great.

Don't go soft on us man!

Respectfully
Andy James
woodys3b is offline  
Old 01-28-2011, 06:54 AM
  #10317  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I think a spec tire would be better also. A lot of vta guys traded the 21.5 for 25.5.

The 17.5 tc class is a easy transition for most racers .

Its a large class that will help fill the event. I still have 3, 21.5's.
And I'm good with any rules Rob comes with.

I will be there to get my BELT..

3rd place won't do this year
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 01-28-2011, 07:17 AM
  #10318  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: columbus oh
Posts: 898
Default

Originally Posted by woodys3b
Rob,

Sorry, but I think you missed the boat on this one. Change the motor rule to 21.5 and you would have nailed it. We have a small GT class running at our track with 21.5 and here are some of the reasons it works:

1. Speed wise, there is a big gap between VTA and Stock Rubber TC. 21.5 GT fits nicely between the two.

2. 17.5 is too much motor for cars like the FF-03 and TA-05. Yes, they can handle this much motor, but when running against modern carbon chassis with 17.5, they can't hang. The FF-03 becomes pretty much non-competitive. This is big for us as these two chassis' are what we mostly run in GT at the moment.

3. Most of us have old 21.5 motors laying around. We run GT as a second class to 17.5 Rubber TC. We have big dollars wrapped up into our 17.5 cars and like the fact that GT doesn't require a $500 chassis. To quote a previous post, it's just another 17.5 TC class. 17.5 effectively eliminates any front wheel drive, bathtub or shaft drive car.

4. Your tire rule works but I would have just specified the tire with HPI belted X pattern. They work great and wear great.

Don't go soft on us man!

Respectfully
Andy James
i agree..21.5 motor & some type of spec tire...but other the that all the other rules are cool....17.5 would just be another stock class...& everybody has a 21.5 motor...or @ least 90% still have 1
hope this helps
starrx is offline  
Old 01-28-2011, 08:51 AM
  #10319  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
nashrcracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LA - Lower Antioch
Posts: 4,952
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by woodys3b
Rob,

Sorry, but I think you missed the boat on this one. Change the motor rule to 21.5 and you would have nailed it. We have a small GT class running at our track with 21.5 and here are some of the reasons it works:

4. Your tire rule works but I would have just specified the tire with HPI belted X pattern. They work great and wear great.

Don't go soft on us man!

Respectfully
Andy James
actually it's about $40 for xpattern and rims and you ahve to glue them up. jaco blues $29 nexus racing and you don't have to glue them. much better deal. everything else you say is valid.
nashrcracer is offline  
Old 01-28-2011, 10:02 AM
  #10320  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
jlfx car audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: jackson,tn
Posts: 3,834
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nashrcracer
actually it's about $40 for xpattern and rims and you ahve to glue them up. jaco blues $29 nexus racing and you don't have to glue them. much better deal. everything else you say is valid.
DIRLA U JEED TO KEEP UR MIND FOCUSED ON RACIN FOR THE NEXT FEW DAYS . LOL stay off tech or i will tell ur friends wuen u hage a excuse as to why u didnt win
. Lol wwish i was there
jlfx car audio is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.