Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
SMC Lipos 7.4 5000mah >

SMC Lipos 7.4 5000mah

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SMC Lipos 7.4 5000mah

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2007, 06:03 AM
  #391  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Danny/SMC

It has never been my companies goals to bash other companies products.
Originally Posted by Danny/SMC
What has Orion created ? They just use Kokam packs and market them. Last time I checked Kokam wasn't the leader in Lipo technology but you guys may want to believe all the hype.
Sorry I just found this funny as back to back posts.
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:23 AM
  #392  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
bxpitbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Union City, New Jersey
Posts: 1,883
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Danny/SMC
There is no problem for a regular style Lipo when used in the proper car/truck. I know this is an onroad forum where most of you run sedans but cam you stop and think that our Lipo pack was designed and built to fit in offroad cars/ trucks.

When we do come out with a Lipo pack in a hard case then you guys can pass on your proffesional comments.

As far as pricing goes last time I checked Horizon Hobby was selling our Lipo pack 15 dollars cheaper than the Orion 4800/20C pack. When I look at Lipo pricing capacity and C rate increases the price.
Um, Danny, cool your jets and look at my posts. I am not an Orion guy, I am a Maxamps guy. AND, $15 dollars cheaper for a soft pack w/o internal fusing will make some dudes wonder. Maxamps gives alternatives...such as higher C ratings and a BEVY of mah offerings. I work in marketing and if you are going to bring a product into the mix, you have to bring something that differentiates you from "the other guys". $15 less than Orion, soft case, no internal fuse AND exposed cells (blow up your own image) and maybe you can see where the doubt is cast. Again, steer your debate away from me and towards those who bash your product.

Last edited by bxpitbull; 09-25-2007 at 06:35 AM.
bxpitbull is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:28 AM
  #393  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

You know actually there has been very little bashing of the actual product (except its lack of a hard-case which was address in the first couple pages of the thread). The only "bashing" seems to come from the lack of safety data/methodology being shared. For some reason SMC just ignores the requests for it.
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:42 AM
  #394  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by or8ital
The only "bashing" seems to come from the lack of safety data/methodology being shared. For some reason SMC just ignores the requests for it.
No, that doesn't sound like bashing at all.

Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread?

A lot of what you are requesting is spelled out in detail in our two page instruction sheet that comes with every pack.
Jack Rimer is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:46 AM
  #395  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
No, that doesn't sound like bashing at all.

Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread?

A lot of what you are requesting is spelled out in detail in our two page instruction sheet that comes with every pack.
Can you post it? I shouldnt have to learn about safety AFTER I bought the product. Can you answer the questions from my post a few posts ago (list of questions).

You should thank those 5 people. You said the more post the more you sold!
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:46 AM
  #396  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
bxpitbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Union City, New Jersey
Posts: 1,883
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
No, that doesn't sound like bashing at all.

Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread?

A lot of what you are requesting is spelled out in detail in our two page instruction sheet that comes with every pack.
You can probably chalk it up to people that have used your sub c cells and want to give your lipos a shot.
bxpitbull is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:57 AM
  #397  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
kuzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 948
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
No, that doesn't sound like bashing at all.

Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread?

A lot of what you are requesting is spelled out in detail in our two page instruction sheet that comes with every pack.
Jack,
I just went to SMC's website and can't seem to find any information out about the packs. I now know how to treat your nimh cells as that information is readily available. Honestly there was no mention that I could find that you even have lipo packs unless I missed it. I guess I'm just at a loss as to why if this information is available on a piece of paper that it can't be available on the website/on request. Did someone lose the Word doc used to create that piece of paper included with the packs?
kuzo is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:59 AM
  #398  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by bxpitbull
You can probably chalk it up to people that have used your sub c cells and want to give your lipos a shot.
?
Jack Rimer is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:23 AM
  #399  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
bxpitbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Union City, New Jersey
Posts: 1,883
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bxpitbull
You can probably chalk it up to people that have used your sub c cells and want to give your lipos a shot.
Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
?
That statement was in response to your comment/question,"Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread? "
bxpitbull is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:30 AM
  #400  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (75)
 
squarehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
No, that doesn't sound like bashing at all.

No, it doesn't. It sounds like a simple request from people who are genuinely interested in finding out more about YOUR products. It sounds like people who are concerned about more than just battery performance and discharge rates. It sounds like thinking individuals who want to know what they are buying BEFORE they buy it.

And yet, you continue to insult our collective intelligence by trying to turn this entire thread into some kind of "attack SMC/JACO" stance when it's wholly not.




The results of this thread for anyone who has read it's entirety is that SMC and JACO either won't or can't supply buyers with any information about the specifics of their LiPo packs. And, regardless of the reasons, insist of berating those who are only asking for details. It's NOT too much to request, and yet it continues to be a sticking point for SMC and it's spokesmen.

In that, I'm disappointed in a company I had more respect for. In the future, I will make more of an effort to support other companies and individuals that are more concerned with their buyer's needs, wants and concerns, and doesn't brush off difficult questions with martyr groans of "public bashing."



That's just me—I could be wrong.
squarehead is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:44 AM
  #401  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: orbital gun
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
No, it doesn't. It sounds like a simple request from people who are genuinely interested in finding out more about YOUR products. It sounds like people who are concerned about more than just battery performance and discharge rates. It sounds like thinking individuals who want to know what they are buying BEFORE they buy it.

And yet, you continue to insult our collective intelligence by trying to turn this entire thread into some kind of "attack SMC/JACO" stance when it's wholly not.
Hammer, nail, head...

One thing the LiPo faithful should be mindful of is the outright negativity toward Chinese sources. A lot of reputable companies source their LiPos from China (Apple's iPhone, for example), and that's a device where the thing can't even be replaced. Linger has stated in the past that he's visited Chinese factories that are very close in quality to those found in Korea and Japan. Just something to keep in mind, because Danny's point about people being negative toward anything that isn't Enerland/Kokam/Saehan is pretty accurate.
undark is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:45 AM
  #402  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
No, it doesn't. It sounds like a simple request from people who are genuinely interested in finding out more about YOUR products. It sounds like people who are concerned about more than just battery performance and discharge rates. It sounds like thinking individuals who want to know what they are buying BEFORE they buy it.

And yet, you continue to insult our collective intelligence by trying to turn this entire thread into some kind of "attack SMC/JACO" stance when it's wholly not.




The results of this thread for anyone who has read it's entirety is that SMC and JACO either won't or can't supply buyers with any information about the specifics of their LiPo packs. And, regardless of the reasons, insist of berating those who are only asking for details. It's NOT too much to request, and yet it continues to be a sticking point for SMC and it's spokesmen.

In that, I'm disappointed in a company I had more respect for. In the future, I will make more of an effort to support other companies and individuals that are more concerned with their buyer's needs, wants and concerns, and doesn't brush off difficult questions with martyr groans of "public bashing."



That's just me—I could be wrong.
What does JACO have to do with this?
Jack Rimer is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:49 AM
  #403  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by bxpitbull
That statement was in response to your comment/question,"Is it me or do the same 5 people keep posting on this thread? "
Hey, good one! Glad I'm wrong about the bashing. I must just be paranoid.
Jack Rimer is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:49 AM
  #404  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
What does JACO have to do with this?
I beleive he was talking about the negativity of the SMC management which is similar to the Jaco management, is it not?
or8ital is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:53 AM
  #405  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
Hey, good one! Glad I'm wrong about the bashing. I must just be paranoid.
Its sad that people asking for more information about your product (safety, performance, etc) is seen by you as bashing.


SMC target customers:



sheep
noun1. woolly usually horned ruminant mammal related to the goat 2. a timid defenseless simpleton who is readily preyed upon 3. a docile and vulnerable person who would rather follow than make an independent decision; "his students followed him like sheep"
WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.

Last edited by or8ital; 09-25-2007 at 08:03 AM.
or8ital is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.