Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Running shorty's in a touring car >

Running shorty's in a touring car

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree41Likes

Running shorty's in a touring car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2020, 01:59 AM
  #76  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,255
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bry195
great answer and I agree. But i did a piss poor job of explaining.


Not necessarily pointed to DeserRat...

disregard batteries for a minute. In a conventional layout what is harder to tune on the car. Corners or straight line stop and start? My opinion is corners. 50/50 or 60/40 or whatever your weight distribution preference is you still have to control COG and Roll center (the chassis does). So the control of Roll center and COG in my opinion should compliment cornering more that it does acceleration and deceleration just because corner speed is hard.

If we look at shorty batteries it does two things. It allows you to move weight down (weights) and minimize the front to rear distribution of weight that is high on the chassis. So lets take the weights out of the conversation now because we can do the same trick with a slim pack or a shorty. A shorty will condense the mass that moves from front to rear which is more of an acceleration/deceleration thing and the chassis is pretty good at handling that. A slim pack is moved closer to the centerline of the chassis potentially minimizing roll.

Thats really the question. Would you rather have weight closer to the centerline for left right or extended front to rear less?

Im pretty sure the answer will be an opinion probably supporting shorties but I dont hear about anyone trying slim packs and in my mind I would think they would help in the corners.

Chassis have been getting narrower and mass has been getting pushed to the center or center line of a chassis. Is one better than the other? Slim versus shortie kind of fits into that progression.
A slim pack moves the left/right balance more towards the motor (assuming the shorty and the slim weigh the same), so you'll need more weights to maintain the balance.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-12-2020, 04:56 AM
  #77  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,387
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

To my mind, the big benefit of a shorty is getting the CoG lower, when compared with a std size pack.

That's of particular benefit when running on higher traction surfaces that don't use as much battery during a run.. i.e. indoor carpet. The handling benefits of getting the CoG down low outweighs the reduction in capacity and voltage drop issues. Outdoors, on larger asphalt tracks, swings back the other way.
picco007 and EDWARD2003 like this.
TryHard is offline  
Old 03-12-2020, 07:53 PM
  #78  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
EDWARD2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,200
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

This past week I was able to test between R1 LCG 5500 and R1 4000 shorty pack configurations at Yatabe Arena which has CRC Black carpet.
In Japan, we run 17.5T boosted class, not blinky.

After running about 9 practice sessions using R1 LCG 5500 I found the car to be right on the edge of grip rolling (sometimes I could see the tire lifting off the carpet). So I had to be very mindful of not throwing too hard in and driving hard out of the corner. It also was slightly slower when transition through tight technical sections.

Afterwards, I switched over the to the R1 4000 shorty pack and noticed several things. The car was noticeably different when transitioning through the same technical sections. I could easily throw the car into the corner without it showing any signs of grip rolling. I noticed the car was much easier to drive and it allowed me to setup the car faster for the next corner.

However, the plus side of the 5500 mAh gave me the voltage I needed throughout a 5 minute run. Whereas the 4000 I noticed a slight drop in voltage around 4:30 mark, but wasn't an issue.

R1 5500 mAh LCG
25 5:10.5
Avg 12.4
Best Lap 12.0

R1 4000 mAh Shorty
25 5:07.3
Avg 12.3
Best Lap 11.9

When running the 4000 mAh setup I was consistently running 25 laps around 5:10 mark. I couldn't do this easily with the 5500 LCG as I would have to really push the car hard at the point of it grip rolling.

There is a noticeable difference in handling and consistency when running a short pack under high traction conditions. Though my situation is unique when it comes to running boost, I wouldn't recommend it for blinky class.

Hope this helps.

TryHard and Bry195 like this.

Last edited by EDWARD2003; 03-12-2020 at 10:48 PM.
EDWARD2003 is offline  
Old 03-12-2020, 08:16 PM
  #79  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,011
Default

Great info and i appreciate the answers. When mass is converted to energy and multiplied by distance it can get complicated to control. I should go model this in RC3 and see if it makes a difference.
Bry195 is offline  
Old 03-13-2020, 12:42 AM
  #80  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
damang999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 595
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

I have set my car up for shorty but not yet run it.
My batteries are 5600mah full size at 290gr and shorty are 6000mah at 217gr.
my 5600 are right on the edge of dropping of at the end of a heat , even though my shorty is bigger mah are they going to drop off more being a shorty ?
damang999 is offline  
Old 03-13-2020, 03:24 AM
  #81  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
 
Marcos.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Semper Fi
Posts: 32,999
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by damang999
I have set my car up for shorty but not yet run it.
My batteries are 5600mah full size at 290gr and shorty are 6000mah at 217gr.
my 5600 are right on the edge of dropping of at the end of a heat , even though my shorty is bigger mah are they going to drop off more being a shorty ?
no I have no issues with drop off or run time issues with my 5800 mah shorty compared to the 6,000 mah full size pack I used to run , my guess is 10pounds of sand is the same as a 10lb lead weight. 10 pounds is 10pounds , so I could be wrong
Marcos.J is offline  
Old 03-13-2020, 12:39 PM
  #82  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
BmainStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: pullin in,ca.
Posts: 1,993
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default Shawtys

I Snagged an Mugen for the Elecs it had.
Was gnna sell it till I realized I had extra elecs to get it going. 21.5 med grip assphalt Car. I stacked the WT. Next to the motor to keep wt on the Rear.
Have not Scale Yet but Feels Close.
Feels close is what I said about My T4 aswell.
T4 1st time on scales went 50-50,50-50. Amazing!
Gnna rain Here for daze...Need Shakedwn on MTC1


BmainStar is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 04:41 PM
  #83  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
damang999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 595
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

I got to race with my shorty setup on a medium large outdoor track.
while the car handled amazing with the balanced setup and the extra weight that was needed mounted nice and low on the chassis the voltage drop off sucked completely.
it dropped way more than I expected it to even running a 600mah
it might be ok for some cars and tracks .
i was running 13.5 blinky touring car
damang999 is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 02:53 PM
  #84  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,255
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by damang999
I have set my car up for shorty but not yet run it.
My batteries are 5600mah full size at 290gr and shorty are 6000mah at 217gr.
my 5600 are right on the edge of dropping of at the end of a heat , even though my shorty is bigger mah are they going to drop off more being a shorty ?
There's no way your shorty has a higher capacity while being 73g lighter. Is your full size pack 7.4V and your shorty 7.6V? You can't compare capacity ratings of LiPo vs LiHV when they're both charged to 8.4V.
V8 Rumble likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 04:56 PM
  #85  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
damang999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 595
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
There's no way your shorty has a higher capacity while being 73g lighter. Is your full size pack 7.4V and your shorty 7.6V? You can't compare capacity ratings of LiPo vs LiHV when they're both charged to 8.4V.
Well that would be silly ,
even if that was the case
from the math I did it’s only a couple of hundred milli amps difference and the shorty would still have more capacity
damang999 is offline  
Old 03-15-2020, 08:28 PM
  #86  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
 
Cycledude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Fresno
Posts: 32
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Marcos.J
...my guess is 10pounds of sand is the same as a 10lb lead weight. 10 pounds is 10pounds , so I could be wrong
What weighs more, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers?

Cycledude is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 12:45 AM
  #87  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,255
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by damang999
Well that would be silly ,
even if that was the case
from the math I did it’s only a couple of hundred milli amps difference and the shorty would still have more capacity
What specific battery packs do you have?
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:18 PM
  #88  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,011
Default

Originally Posted by Cycledude
What weighs more, a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers?

https://youtu.be/-fC2oke5MFg
Lol, the real question is how much force/torque does it take to hold a pound up with your arm extended 1 ft versus close to your body while lifting it. One of the answers is a 1ftllb and the other is much less.
Bry195 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.