![]() |
wtcc's TT-02 KR
How should I start...
Right in time for the upcoming indoor season, my joy for RC is returning strong. The fever got real strong when AE announced the TC7.2. I also checked what kind of racing series will be held here in south Germany. And so one evening I discovered the RCK-Kleinserie. RC-Kleinkram is one of the biggest RC shops in Germany and this year it starts a new series with four classes. Two of these are GT with the proven TT-02 as required chassis. The GT2-class consist of full box stock Porsche cars while the GT-Sport is the open TT-02 class for the TT-02 R and S variants, including all tuning parts. The rules for GT-Sport are made for me :lol: No minimum weight, 17.5t Ruddog motor, 5.0 gearing, blinky esc, free rubber tire choice, body must be scale GT like PF Ford GT or Tamiya GT bodies with at least real looking color scheme. At least two races will be held in my region, not far away... That was the point when my brain started planning the total-TT-02-RC-war-wtcc-style. :deathstar So I looked in my hobby room what I have left over from my RC career and found a lot spares from my AE TCs, my Xray T4 and spares from the FF03. I took over one half the kitchen island table (my wife :flaming: ) and started checking what is possible. And if you like the TT-02 chassis or not, it is capable to become everything you want with compareable little effort. The more I work and drive with this car, the more I love it. And this is how the story starts. There will be more posts coming today, as the project is already in an advanced stage ;) |
Here is the link to the racing series:
RCK-KleinSerie ? You race, we care! |
I'm watching this thread with baited breath. :-)
|
I just promise to fullfill my own visions :sweat:
This was my starting point: https://abload.de/img/d1023573-437b-4915-8fhis5.jpeg Normal TT-02 with ball bearings, aluminium shaft and oil filled shocks. Of course I leave off not needed parts like the rear bumper or the fan-motor-cover. This 2 year old chassis already won a race in the Tamiya Euro Cup and was a DTM- and a Super GT-car before. |
What's the white stuff under the steering gear?
|
Oh, good you mention it :blush:
The chassis was a rallye car once, too. This white part belongs to a lexan rain cover. I ran it in my Subaru WRX configuration to keep out dust and water. That is another German engineering, but not by me :lol: |
You're making me want to make a thread about my FF03..
|
My next step was to think how to implement a full adjustable suspension. Additionally I wanted to get rid of all the plastic covers. I know they are perfect to keep dust and dirt away from all the gears, but I find them quite ugly. All these parts flew off the car.
Of course this caused more problems at first. The covers also hold the driveshaft and all bearings in place. I remembered a old conversion I did with the TC6 to make it fit Pro10 bodies. I replaced the upper bearing cap with a shimmed cfk plate. This time the small plate should be multifunctional with including the camber link and the shocktower mount. So I would need 4 small plates for the shocktower, camber link and to hold the diffbearings in place and two more plates for the driveshaft bearings. https://abload.de/img/87194d4c-bd67-4e26-8ujdk7.jpeg https://abload.de/img/a6860990-b1b3-4f57-bq5dt9.jpeg https://abload.de/img/845b18e5-ea5f-4983-b6be6s.jpeg Here you see the car with TC6.2 shocktower. They were hold by old AE servomounts, which I shortened for the "lightest TC car" project, once. The hole distance was so small, that it was really tight to fit without rubbing the differential. In between I installed the TRF416 suspension from my FF03. It nearly fits, just the arm pins needed to be shortenend by 1mm. This made me very happy. Up to now I wanted to use mostly parts from my old cars to keep the costs low. Because tuning a TT-02 seems so ridiculous... :eek: I am still not sure if I am a little crazy/stupid doing this. I had to think about how judgemental I thought about people who bought tuning parts for several hundred dollar for this chassis instead of buying a pro rc car... Well up to now everything went together quite nice. My conversion reached the level of a TT-02S and I haven't spent a dollar, yet. Still missing though were antirollbars and a way to adjust droop. The both problems were solved with more small cfk-plates. https://abload.de/img/6232f98c-57ce-42b0-8rhfgz.jpeg The design and production takes its time. Until this stage I had thought, drawed and dremeled for 4 days. And everything worked :eek: Then my attitude changed: Why going through all this "hassle" and then only having the second best components with this handmade look... Thank you very much, brain! :tire: |
Originally Posted by Nerobro
(Post 15293617)
You're making me want to make a thread about my FF03..
|
Originally Posted by wtcc
(Post 15293633)
Do it! ;)
https://www.rctech.net/forum/electri...s-cheaply.html So, on the subject of your car. Hard chassis pans are cheap. Like $20, cheap. And white looks ~gooood~. |
Another great project from WTCC :D Will you also implement adjustable rear toe? :D
|
In between some "normal" tuning parts arrived:
https://abload.de/img/f5215dbb-285c-47a6-a4oiix.jpeg The Yeah Racing motor mount and the Tamiya high speed gear set are very useful for the right gearing. Also the Ruddog 17.5t motor arrived. The combination of these components with a 80 theeth 64dp spur gear and a 41 theeth pinion works like charm. I accidently discovered that the motor cooling cut out at the front end perfectly avoids the tub plastic for the rear drive shaft bearing. This way it would be possible to use a 40 theeth, maybe even a 39 theeth pinion on a 80 theeth spur. Awesome! :D With the motor so far inside I will try to use a 6000mAh shorty lipo and should reach the optimal r/l balance. |
Some posts above I mentioned, that I wasn't fully satisfied with the look and the precision of my conversion so far. So I sat down and did some more measuring and build parts in CAD. There I optimized some distances and went for a practical look. The principle with the cfk plates stayed the same. The changes mostly occured with the shocktower mounts (now with hole for the camber links) and the anti-roll-bar-mounts. These now look like the normal mounts, but also replace the outer cfk plate shims: https://abload.de/img/bildschirmfoto2018-092ffk7.png Blue are all plastic parts, cfk and arb-wires are grey Of course I don't produce the plastic parts myself. After very good experiences with the KR-MF bulkheads, it was clear that I can trust sintered Nylon parts. I prepared the data for Shapeways: https://abload.de/img/bildschirmfoto2018-09j6c2l.png And ordered the parts: https://abload.de/img/c8581075-9c34-4cfc-axjdja.jpeg https://abload.de/img/e0ede7ef-44c7-4424-94sewh.jpeg At the same time I ordered the cfk-plates as well. I hope they will arrive on saturday. If you want to take a closer look at the parts --> I opened a Shapeways shop for fun: https://www.shapeways.com/shops/kr-m...utosport-teile |
Really nice, Kev' ! This is what we call true rc hobby :nod:
Instead of the sintered nylon ("versatile plastic" = strong and flexible), did you already try the "professional plastic" which is from another printing process developped by HP? Just curious if you have already compared both and what are your thoughts :) Regards, G-rem |
No I haven’t... I saw that Shapeways added some materials, but didn‘t look into it... Would be cool if the new process could be more accurate on edges and and angled surfaces. My parts look a little ugly at some edges. @Papi: I will maybe later check if it is possible. Depends on how the car performs if I got all my parts. If it lacks steering then... ;) |
Originally Posted by wtcc
(Post 15294149)
No I haven’t... I saw that Shapeways added some materials, but didn‘t look into it... Would be cool if the new process could be more accurate on edges and and angled surfaces. My parts look a little ugly at some edges. |
G-rem forgot the best part about fillet, they make the part sexier :D:D CURVES
|
Rounding edges indeed works flawless with small parts in a Shapeways production. I chamfered some edges, but that only creates two edges :rolleyes: I wanted to make it look cool with sharp edges...lesson learned. |
Last update for today:
Part of trying to get the best performance out of the car was not only to use some parts that "could do it", but use the best. Well, and I ordered a new high performance touring car chassis with the TC7.2, so my Xray T4 is actually a roller. As result of this thinking, the TRF416 suspension went back onto my FF03. I also bought a new TT-02 tub chassis for 5,49€ (my old one was tweaked). It got the full T4 suspension with arb, hard plastic hubs and graphite arms. At this point I must admit to be very happy that Tamiya and Xray agreed on the same sizes for hinge pins and axles. It was pure plug and play. After a little pondering I decided to buy the TT-02 Type-S steel suspension mount set (54634). This should be more durable in a chrash and allows to drive (inboard) toe at the rear. Unfortunately Tamiya got the measurement a little wrong: The whole pin setup has more slop than I hoped it would have... https://abload.de/img/7ecf3165-d926-4f29-9i5iow.jpeg And that is the current status of this project. What is left of the TT-02 from the beginning? The tub chassis, the drive shaft, differentials bearings and servo mounts :p Maybe some of you recognized these strange "screws" standing out of the tub chassis near the differentials. I want to try something else here. We call it "Stehbolzen" in Germany. The online translation says stud, stay bolt or stud bolt. The idea is to conserve the thread in the tub chassis by using a M3x16mm set screw and a nut screw to tighten (like you would with an aluminium engine block). |
Are those the ulp shock?
|
No, SLPs.
Don't tease me :lol: |
Originally Posted by wtcc
(Post 15294343)
Maybe some of you recognized these strange "screws" standing out of the tub chassis near the differentials. I want to try something else here. We call it "Stehbolzen" in Germany. The online translation says stud, stay bolt or stud bolt. The idea is to conserve the thread in the tub chassis by using a M3x16mm set screw and a nut screw to tighten (like you would with an aluminium engine block).
Several of the cars I've built recently use studs to screw the ball ends on to. Though, personally, I'd spec longer studs than the car manufacturers are having me use. |
Originally Posted by Nerobro
(Post 15294376)
Are you using a thread forming tap yet?
|
I'd only very, very, rarely strip a screw. And never on the first use of a hole. Thread formed (i'm being specific here, because thread cutting is a no-no here.) holes have this lovely solid "thunk" of sorts, when you bottom out the fastener. The rise in torque from "spinning threads" to "seated parts" is really nice to feel.
If you were on this side of the any ocean, I'd send you one. |
Originally Posted by G-rem
(Post 15294123)
Really nice, Kev' ! This is what we call true rc hobby :nod:
Instead of the sintered nylon ("versatile plastic" = strong and flexible), did you already try the "professional plastic" which is from another printing process developped by HP? Just curious if you have already compared both and what are your thoughts :) Regards, G-rem wtcc keep up the good work. I've already got some new ideas. Just need to sneak in some more design time. |
Originally Posted by wtcc
(Post 15294382)
No, I don't. I just twist the studs in and that is it. I think with metric thread studs it make sense. Before I used the original Tamiya kit screws. And they work exceptional well in this plastic material. I never overtightened or damaged a thread. It is also experience. After nearly ten years into this hobby I developed a sense for the right amount of torque for plastic, aluminium and steel.
|
Originally Posted by wtcc
(Post 15294363)
No, SLPs.
Don't tease me :lol: |
Parts arrived :D Today the carbon plates came. I am very impressed by the quality of the milling and the carbon. https://abload.de/img/180cd83e-dbcd-41f9-bd4iss.jpeg Date of installation will be early next week (if I find time the TC7.2 will be finished first ;) ). |
This is both awesome, and silly. Are you sure you're german? I'm enjoying watching the build. :-)
|
I am a Japanese caught in the body of a German :lol:
|
Where do you order your carbon parts? :)
|
https://www.ahltec.de/shop/de/info/U...esservice.html It was my first time ordering there. Good communication also. |
I'm confused by this thread. It's interesting, but I feel something has been lost along the way. Why does this GT-Sport class enforce a TT02 chassis if you're allowed to replace pretty much everything? Also I thought you started off trying to make this a cheap build by reusing parts but now you're custom fabricating significant portions.
Don't get me wrong, it's a good read, I'm just lost on what the spirit of the class is. |
The spirit is having fun with the car and on track with your TT-01/TT-02. There are a lot of different people with different TT specs and/or tuning parts. These guys should all be able to run the class. Not everything is allowed to change. The black tub has to stay and remain unchanged. I guess they wanted an open class for all TT owners. Definitely the spirit of the class is not a fanatic RC car builder like me. I know I am overdoing it, but that is my way of having fun in this hobby and one big part besides driving. In the beginning I had the idea that I wanted to use my old stuff, but when I saw the result (and also minor problems with some solutions), I suddenly had the urge to make it in a more professional way. At least I showed, how it could be done with a little effort and spare parts. Sorry for this misunderstanding... |
Philosophical question: What make a TT02 a TT02? I mean, you have removed over 50% of original parts... Will it be ok with the rules?
|
Rules? I thought WTCC was having fun to see what he could do with the platform. Did I miss where he said that he was building to a certain spec?
|
Originally Posted by Airwave
(Post 15295955)
Philosophical question: What make a TT02 a TT02? I mean, you have removed over 50% of original parts... Will it be ok with the rules?
Sh!t is deep yo |
Tyger,
There have been a couple of vintage race cars effectively destroyed in accidents in the last year or so. When asked about the implications to the originality of the rebuilt car, the response was basically that if the chassis tag was original, so was the rest of it. |
Originally Posted by NutDriver
(Post 15296015)
Rules? I thought WTCC was having fun to see what he could do with the platform. Did I miss where he said that he was building to a certain spec?
|
Originally Posted by Airwave
(Post 15295955)
Philosophical question: What make a TT02 a TT02? I mean, you have removed over 50% of original parts...
|
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 09:35 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.