Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread! >

TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree26Likes

TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-23-2016, 10:37 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Matt Trimmings
Cub86 posted the question: Hi. I'm struggling to understand the lay down situation. I run on high bite damp smooth clay and think the conversation would help on my surface but from what I'm reading I need to buy the lay down kit tlr338004. And the dirt gear case tlr332063. But do I really need both from what I've read the dirt case is 1-2mm higher anyway and u don't use the +3mm hubs or the front pivot hrc or Hrc mod. So is the dirt lay down kit tlr332063 is all that's needed to get me a lay down set up that's suited for clay With the components and car I already have. And if I only get the dirt case is there any problems that will need to be addressed IE.. bone plunge . I do know I'll need 1mm spacers on the waterfall to clear the battery. Thanks guys really trying to get my head around this.

Franks response:
Laydown Conversion will work great by itself. You run the aluminum +3mm hubs, the diff is +3.5mm, and you run the HRC front setup. Just follow a setup sheet from tlracing.com (Frank Root).

Dirt Tranny has the diff at the same height as the standard tranny case, and works with the standard plastic hubs. Both are +/- 0mm from stock. When you run this, no need to run the HRC front mod either.

I've found the stock laydown conversion parts to work great for most tracks. The dirt tranny is a great tuning option, but definitely not 'required'.

K.King
Something I made, pretty basic. Just to give people an idea.

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:22 AM
  #2806  
TLRacing
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Davidka
It's not actually Clay, most Midwest tracks are Triple sifted topsoil. It's been changing the past few years. It used to be unnecessary, then it provided a couple of 10th's.

It was super high grip when it was in the small room (you raced here back then, at the Spektrum race). Slicks, wheelies, it was like running on modeling clay.
That was a fun bull-ring
Frank Root is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 02:48 PM
  #2807  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Guch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default lay down body vs. stock 3.0 body

I see the lay down conversion uses a new body. Can someone clarify if a lay down body will fit a stock 3.0? Will a stock 3.0 body fit a lay down converted buggy? Comments on the details of why each body is different would be helpfull.
Guch is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 03:05 PM
  #2808  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 724
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Sorry if this has already been asked but it seems that the mip puck sytem has been discontinued. What do are you guys doing to lighten up that area other than cut gears.

Or what other puck system might work?
Josh Pease is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 03:36 PM
  #2809  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (170)
 
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 6,272
Trader Rating: 170 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Guch
I see the lay down conversion uses a new body. Can someone clarify if a lay down body will fit a stock 3.0? Will a stock 3.0 body fit a lay down converted buggy? Comments on the details of why each body is different would be helpfull.
The stock body is cut for the stand up trans and motor plate. The laydown body is not cut in the back and includes the hole for the slipper. The stock body would probably fit the laydown but then the spur / motor is more exposed, the laydown body won't fit the std without some cutting.
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 03:36 PM
  #2810  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (170)
 
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 6,272
Trader Rating: 170 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Josh Pease
Sorry if this has already been asked but it seems that the mip puck sytem has been discontinued. What do are you guys doing to lighten up that area other than cut gears.

Or what other puck system might work?
They are working on a 3.0 puck system.
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 04:50 PM
  #2811  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 724
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Trimmings
They are working on a 3.0 puck system.
Thanks Matt. I dropped the other brand to drive the losi got all the other stuff but couldn't get a puck system was kinda bummed
Josh Pease is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 05:04 PM
  #2812  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Kewlbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 450
Trader Rating: 63 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Josh Pease
Thanks Matt. I dropped the other brand to drive the losi got all the other stuff but couldn't get a puck system was kinda bummed
2.0 and 3.0 axles are the same, 2.0 pucks should work? Though I thought I saw MIP was working on a better system.
Kewlbug is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 07:15 PM
  #2813  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West Babylon, NY
Posts: 150
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Kewlbug
2.0 and 3.0 axles are the same, 2.0 pucks should work? Though I thought I saw MIP was working on a better system.
2.0 pucks work with no problem.
TimmE is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 08:08 PM
  #2814  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Guch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default MIP

I just looked at MIP's website and the 2.0 system is still for sale. It is the shiny system. Is the shiny system the polished aluminum axles for stock racing or are the axles chromed steel for mod.?
Guch is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 08:47 PM
  #2815  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (112)
 
thecman26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 8,269
Trader Rating: 112 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Guch
I just looked at MIP's website and the 2.0 system is still for sale. It is the shiny system. Is the shiny system the polished aluminum axles for stock racing or are the axles chromed steel for mod.?
The shiny system is for mod, the bi-metal is the lighter stock units.
thecman26 is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 09:05 PM
  #2816  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 724
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

I'd rather run mod but no one at our local track ever wants to run mod they all want to run stock and 98% run ae cars with everything you can do to them like the one I just ditched.

All the 2.0 aluminum puck stuff has been discontinued. Guess I'll wait until late the new system is out.

Thanks for the reply's everyone
Josh Pease is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 09:57 PM
  #2817  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Root
22-24mm is the range I'd try to stay in. 21-23mm with HRC front and rear
Wow really that high? I've been running mine down at 17-18 mm still with lrc blocks and been quite happy with it. Have got racing this weekend so will lift it up and see how it goes...
rally stylz is offline  
Old 05-12-2016, 12:06 AM
  #2818  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (47)
 
K_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,234
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

Been running the 22 3.0 laydown on my local track here with some pretty good success. Our track is like OCRC, but it can get dusty and dry. I made a rear turnbuckle change tonight and really liked it for our current layout which has some step downs after a fast sweeper. Keeps the rear pretty planted. Really easy to drive and consistent.

Last edited by Matt M.; 03-11-2017 at 03:28 AM.
K_King is offline  
Old 05-12-2016, 05:52 AM
  #2819  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Andrew Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fairfield, Pennsylvania
Posts: 555
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by K_King
Been running the 22 3.0 laydown on my local track here with some pretty good success. Our track is like OCRC, but it can get dusty and dry. I made a rear turnbuckle change tonight and really liked it for our current layout which has some step downs after a fast sweeper. Keeps the rear pretty planted. Really easy to drive and consistent.
Which Yokomo green rear spring are you using? The big bore, yatabe, or yokomo "x"?
Andrew Gray is offline  
Old 05-12-2016, 06:02 AM
  #2820  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 630
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rally stylz
Wow really that high? I've been running mine down at 17-18 mm still with lrc blocks and been quite happy with it. Have got racing this weekend so will lift it up and see how it goes...
Things may be different with LRC, but running the HRC front and rear with ride height that low is no good. It was very unforgiving in that I had to land with both left and right tires at exactly the same time, or I'd upset the car and possibly tumble. I found that for the stock chassis on carpet, running HRC all around and getting the ride height up around 21 mm was the best. Maybe it was having the suspension geometry closer to what it was designed to be, I don't know. I imagine slamming it down to 17 mm really changes the geometry.
Callaway is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.